Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:50:07 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.politics.guns        back       
Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns   
On Oct 7, 1:27 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel  wrote innews:8c5a27d4-d14d-480f-9c87-4576cece3136@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 11:21 pm, "SaPeIsMa"  wrote:
> >> "Daniel"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:c932a16e-1ade-4a83-8775-68d5ca8323e2@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
> >> ... On Oct 5, 9:06 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > Daniel  wrote
> >> > innews:c64ce367-2725-4fc3-95b9-d896473d18e8@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups
> >> > .co
> > m:
>
> >> > > On Oct 4, 6:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)
> >> > > @comcast.net> wrote:
> >> > >> Daniel  wrote
> >> > >> innews:44b98dc4-d0b0-4f18-aed9-fbfe
> >> > > fd0fa...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> > >> > On Sep 28, 2:32 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >> Bert Hyman  wrote in
> >> > >> >> news:Xns9C947EFFAE7DBVeebleFetzer@ 216.250.184.7:
>
> >> > >> >> > Innews:Xns9C8E753094C71piotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131nrac
> >> > >> >> > lap
> > tr
> >> > >> >> > ap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> > >> >> >> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the
> >> > >> >> >> criminal
> > s
> >> > >> >> >> from the law-abiding citizens? You wait until they murder
> >> > >> >> >> somebody, righ
> >> > >> > t
> >> > >> >> >> Spaniel?
>
> >> > >> >> > That's the way the law works in a civilized society; you
> >> > >> >> > have t
> > o
> >> > >> >> > wait until a crime's actually been committed before locking
> >> > >> >> > someone up.
>
> >> > >> >> Actually, preventing crimes by requiring background checks on
> >> > >> >> every gun transaction, whether FFL or private, would be a big
> >> > >> >> ste
> > p
> >> > >> >> in the right direction. So anybody who has a gun who hasn't
> >> > >> >> had a background check
> >> > >> > is
> >> > >> >> automatically a criminal.
>
> >> > >> > And how many criminals bother to legally purchase a gun?
>
> >> > >> If they are felons, they cannot legally purchase one. Period...
>
> >> > > Exactly.
>
> >> > If you don't get background checks on private gun sales, you can't
> >> > catc
> > h
> >> > any felons who buy those guns, and that's exactly what you want eh
> >> > Spaniel?
>
> >> #
> >> # How many felons buy their guns legally?
> >> #
>
> >> <whisper on>
> >> Do you think he can figure out that since felons can NOT legally
> >> posess firearms, the very act of purchasing one is an illegal act ?
> >> <whisper off>
>
> > He can't figure out if the sun is shiniing or not.
>
> When felons buy guns through private sellers there's no way to tell if
> the sale is legal or illegal because there's no background check.  So the
> default assumption is that the sale is legal.


If a felon buys a gun, it is an UNLAWFUL PURCHASE, and both the felon
AND the seller face criminal charges.


So I ask you dipshits AGAIN, How many felons buy guns legally?
date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:50:07 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Daniel

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us