Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly
carrying guns
On Oct 7, 1:07 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel wrote in news:2c2bdc09-3e2a-42cc-8152-
> a9acc1466...@d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 11:19 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> > Why do you want me to get another check? Is it because your real
> >> > objective is to get all guns and gun owners registered
>
> >> Yes.
>
> >> > so that you and
> >> > your Progressives can set the next law in place to confiscate all of
> >> > the guns of those that don't approve of your taking over of the
> >> > government or swear allegiance to the government or leader?
>
> >> Yes.
>
> > Too bad the Second Amendment won't allow you to do that.
>
> The Second Amendment has nothing to do with the states' reserved police
> power, which includes the power to enact and enforce laws affecting
> public safety.
Of course you're wrong, but that's nothing new.
>
> Your fake knowledge of the Second Amendment is like a tea-bagger's fake
> knowledge of "death panels" and "Obama was born in Kenya". It's
> something you can choose to believe but it's not something you can make
> true.
>
> And we have tons of recorded history and law that proves it.
No, you don't.
>
> Now, if the right wing of the US Supreme Court keeps lying about the
> Second Amendment, at least one justice will be impeached and removed.
> Guess who, Spaniel. The issue here isn't left vs right, but rather the
> Constitutionally mandated preservation and efficiency of the National
> Guard, aka the well-regulated militia of the Second Amendment.
Newsflash, dumbfuck. You're the only uninformed one here. There is NO
link between military service and the RKBA. I have asked you time and
time again to prove your allegation, and you have run like a bitch
every time.
>
> So it's not about you as an individual, Spaniel; it's about the whole
> body of the people,
Hint: the Second Amendment IS and individual right.
>and how the National Guard is necessary to the
> security of our respective states.
The National Guard has nothing to do with the Second Amendment.
date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
author: Daniel
|