On Oct 4, 8:47 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel  wrote innews:44b98dc4-d0b0-4f18-aed9-fbfefd0fa6e5@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2:32 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> Bert Hyman  wrote in
> >> news:Xns9C947EFFAE7DBVeebleFetzer@ 216.250.184.7:
>
> >> > Innews:Xns9C8E753094C71piotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131nraclaptrap
> >> > <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> >> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the criminals
> >> >> from the law-abiding citizens?  You wait until they murder
> >> >> somebody, righ
> > t
> >> >> Spaniel?
>
> >> > That's the way the law works in a civilized society; you have to
> >> > wait until a crime's actually been committed before locking someone
> >> > up.
>
> >> Actually, preventing crimes by requiring background checks on every
> >> gun transaction, whether FFL or private, would be a big step in the
> >> right direction.  So anybody who has a gun who hasn't had a
> >> background check is automatically a criminal.  
>
> > And how many criminals bother to legally purchase a gun?
>
> None.  So when a background check is required for all gun transactions,
> private or licensed, and every legal gun owner voluntarily gets a
> background check, and all legal gun owners register their guns, then only
> criminals will have unregistered guns, and only criminals won't have a
> background check for every gun they've bought, traded for or recieved as
> a gift.
>
> Then it'll be easy to catch the criminals.  That's what you want isn't
> it, Spaniel?  Otherwise with all the hundreds of millions of guns there's
> no way to know who's law-abiding and who's a criminal.


YES!!!!!! I want criminals off the streets. What is so fucking hard
for you to understand about that?