Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:29:58 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.politics.guns        back       
Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns   
On Oct 4, 4:48 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel  wrote innews:30b7be10-7bdd-4242-9330-14db6f500d05@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >> >> So now every criminal and felon can openly carry their guns
> >> >> >> without fear of police intervertion.
>
> >> >> > WTF?
>
> >> >> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the criminals
> >> >> from the law-abiding citizens?
>
> >> > Same way you deal with miranda rights.  You lefturds were the ones
> >> > touting "rights" all these years.  Tough when it comes back to bite
> >> > you.
>
> >> You have a privilege to carry guns and it can be easily retracted.
>
> > Wrong. You have a RIGHT.
>
> That's not what Scalia wrote.  Better read DC v. Heller, eh Spaniel?
>
> BTW, do you believe you have an individual right to keep and bear arms in
> the Army, assuming you're really in the Army?


My right to keep and bear arms has nothing to do with my military
service. The Second Amendment to the Constitution guarrantees my right
to keep and bear arms since I am a US citizen.
date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:29:58 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Daniel

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us