Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly
carrying guns
On Sep 23, 4:31 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel wrote innews:6e6b828e-1940-4031-ac60-edf481b27fb5@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 12:31 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> Daniel wrote
> >> innews:bf4aad64-3272-4762-94a9-a9ef
> > f1323...@l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >> So now every criminal and felon can openly carry their guns
> >> >> without fear of police intervertion.
>
> >> > WTF?
>
> >> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the criminals from
> >> the law-abiding citizens? You wait until they murder somebody, right
> >> Spaniel?
>
> > No, felons are not allowed by law to own weapons. Why do you have a
> > problem with a law-abiding citizen exercizing their Second Amendment
> > right?
>
> Why is it okay with you for rapists to carry guns?
What part of my post did you NOT understand? Rapists ARE fleons, and
by law are not allowed to own guns. Why do you have a problem with law
abiding citizens exercising their Second Amendment right?
>
> >> Of course the ones who kill an unarmed man or woman simply because
> >> they "felt threatened", they're with the NRA. They have a right to
> >> murder you if they just "feel threatened".
>
> > Could you please try to make an argument that makes sense?
>
> You're so ignorant you've never heard of "make my day" laws?
>
> Next please.
Like I said, make an argument that makes sense.
date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
author: Daniel
|