Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.politics.guns        back       
Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns   
On Sep 23, 4:31 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel  wrote innews:6e6b828e-1940-4031-ac60-edf481b27fb5@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 12:31 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> Daniel  wrote
> >> innews:bf4aad64-3272-4762-94a9-a9ef
> > f1323...@l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >> So now every criminal and felon can openly carry their guns
> >> >> without fear of police intervertion.
>
> >> > WTF?
>
> >> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the criminals from
> >> the law-abiding citizens?  You wait until they murder somebody, right
> >> Spaniel?
>
> > No, felons are not allowed by law to own weapons. Why do you have a
> > problem with a law-abiding citizen exercizing their Second Amendment
> > right?
>
> Why is it okay with you for rapists to carry guns?


What part of my post did you NOT understand? Rapists ARE fleons, and
by law are not allowed to own guns. Why do you have a problem with law
abiding citizens exercising their Second Amendment right?

>
> >> Of course the ones who kill an unarmed man or woman simply because
> >> they "felt threatened", they're with the NRA.  They have a right to
> >> murder you if they just "feel threatened".
>
> > Could you please try to make an argument that makes sense?
>
> You're so ignorant you've never heard of "make my day" laws?
>
> Next please.


Like I said, make an argument that makes sense.
date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Daniel

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us