On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:11:47 -0400, "RSweeney"  wrote:

|>
|>"Reality_Check©"  wrote in message 
|>news:6k0gdhF5gjdfU1@mid.individual.net...
|>
|>
|>>> See the part above about being "engaged in the performance of his
|>>> duties."  That is the limiter in what you are posting above.  Remove
|>>> that limiter and that court case does not apply.
|>>
|>> So what *unlawful* duties do cops perform, eh numbnuts?
|>
|>No knock warrant service without a no-knock warrant for instance.
|>And breaking and entering without warrant for another.
|>And obtaining a warrant under false pretenses for a third.
|>
|>All three very common violations of both the law and of the US and state 
|>constitutions, the first two of which sometimes leads to armed defensive 
|>response by the inhabitants of the house being illegally invaded under the 
|>color of law. 
|>

	Also the ^Castle Doctrine^, and the natural instinctive survival
laws of COMMON SENSE...

	The para/military/police are not above the laws invoked and bad cops
are quite often used as *collateral damage* in Swat Teams....