|
|
|
date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:03:20 -0500,
group: uk.politics.electoral
back
Re: Local Authority By-Election Results 24 September 2009
In article ,
JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>
> > JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
> >> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> >>> T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> >>>> Paul Hyett wrote:
>
> >>>>>> North Tyneside MBC, Preston
> >>>>>> Con 1141 (55.8; -14.2)
> >>>>>> Lab 503 (24.6; -5.3)
> >>>>>> Public Services not Private Profit 174 (8.5; +8.5)
> >>>>>> LD 152 (7.4; +7.4)
> >>>>>> Green 73 (3.6; +3.6)
> >>>>>> Majority 638
> >>>>>> Turnout not known
> >>>>>> Con hold
> >>>>>> Percentage change is since May 2008
>
> >>>>> The Tories hold a seat on Tyneside??
>
> >>>> The Conservatives have the majority of councillors on North
> >>>> Tyneside and also hold the directly elected Mayor.
>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Tyneside_Council_election,_2008
>
> >>>> However since the media only focus on the big name city councils
> >>>> they perpetuate this rubbish that the Conservatives have no support
> >>>> in northern urban areas.
>
> >>> That will be because what little strength they have is in
> >>> suburban areas, maybe?
>
> >> Well, it probably isn't very strong on inner-city council estates,
> >> if that's what you mean.
> >> And in cities where councils carpeted their inner areas (and even
> >> some of their peripheral suburbs) with council flats in the
> >> fifties, sixties and seventies, that's going to have an effect
> >> which is obvious to anyone looking at the issue dispassionately.
> >> Council- and housing-association housing is a political and
> >> psephological issue. It doesn't just happen by accident.
>
> > You overlook that Tynemouth, a major component of North Tyneside,
> > is another fading Northern seaside resort, not a major city.
>
> What are you talking about?
>
> I haven't mentioned Tynemouth and have said nothing about it.
>
> Do you have anything to say about what I *did* write, as opposed to
> what I didn't write?
Last time I looked at a map, Tynemouth was a significant component of
North Tyneside. The resort stretches along the coast to Cullercoats and
Whitley Bay.
--
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge http://www.rosenstiel.co.uk/
Cambridge Liberal Democrats: http://www.cambridgelibdems.org.uk/
date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:03:20 -0500
author: unknown
|
Re: Local Authority By-Election Results 24 September 2009
rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
>> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>>> JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
>>>> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>>>>> T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
>>>>>> Paul Hyett wrote:
>>>>>>>> North Tyneside MBC, Preston
>>>>>>>> Con 1141 (55.8; -14.2)
>>>>>>>> Lab 503 (24.6; -5.3)
>>>>>>>> Public Services not Private Profit 174 (8.5; +8.5)
>>>>>>>> LD 152 (7.4; +7.4)
>>>>>>>> Green 73 (3.6; +3.6)
>>>>>>>> Majority 638
>>>>>>>> Turnout not known
>>>>>>>> Con hold
>>>>>>>> Percentage change is since May 2008
>>>>>>> The Tories hold a seat on Tyneside??
>>>>>> The Conservatives have the majority of councillors on North
>>>>>> Tyneside and also hold the directly elected Mayor.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Tyneside_Council_election,_2008
>>>>>> However since the media only focus on the big name city councils
>>>>>> they perpetuate this rubbish that the Conservatives have no support
>>>>>> in northern urban areas.
>>>>> That will be because what little strength they have is in
>>>>> suburban areas, maybe?
>>>> Well, it probably isn't very strong on inner-city council estates,
>>>> if that's what you mean.
>>>> And in cities where councils carpeted their inner areas (and even
>>>> some of their peripheral suburbs) with council flats in the
>>>> fifties, sixties and seventies, that's going to have an effect
>>>> which is obvious to anyone looking at the issue dispassionately.
>>>> Council- and housing-association housing is a political and
>>>> psephological issue. It doesn't just happen by accident.
>>> You overlook that Tynemouth, a major component of North Tyneside,
>>> is another fading Northern seaside resort, not a major city.
>> What are you talking about?
>> I haven't mentioned Tynemouth and have said nothing about it.
>> Do you have anything to say about what I *did* write, as opposed to
>> what I didn't write?
> Last time I looked at a map, Tynemouth was a significant component of
> North Tyneside. The resort stretches along the coast to Cullercoats and
> Whitley Bay.
So you *didn't* have anything to say about what I actually wrote.
Thanks for confirming it.
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:05:31 +0100
author: JNugent
|
|
|