Report urges regulated market for cannabis to replace prohibition

A report on cannabis prepared for next year's UN drug policy review will
suggest that a "regulated market" would cause less harm than the current
international prohibition. The report, which is likely to reopen the
debate about cannabis laws, suggests that controls such as taxation,
minimum age requirements and labelling could be explored.

The Global Cannabis Commission report, which will be launched today at a
conference in the House of Lords, has reached conclusions which its
authors suggest "challenge the received wisdom concerning cannabis". It
was carried out for the Beckley foundation, a UN-accredited NGO, for the
2009 UN strategic drug policy review.

There are, according to the report, now more than 160 million users of the
drug worldwide. "Although cannabis can have a negative impact on health,
including mental health, in terms of relative harms it is considerably
less harmful than alcohol or tobacco," according to the report.
"Historically, there have only been two deaths worldwide attributed to
cannabis, whereas alcohol and tobacco together are responsible for an
estimated 150,000 deaths per annum in the UK alone."

The report, compiled by a group of scientists, academics and drug policy
experts, suggests that much of the harm associated with cannabis use is
"the result of prohibition itself, particularly the social harms arising
from arrest and imprisonment." Policies that control cannabis, whether
draconian or liberal, appear to have little impact on the prevalence of
consumption, it concluded.

"In an alternative system of regulated availability, market controls such
as taxation, minimum age requirements, labelling and potency limits are
available to minimise the harms associated with cannabis use," said the
report.

It claimed that only through a regulated market could young people be
protected from the increasingly potent forms of cannabis, such as skunk.
It is intended that the report will form a blueprint for nations seeking
to develop a "more rational and effective approach to the control of
cannabis".

The authors suggest there is evidence that "the current system of cannabis
regulation is not working, and ... there needs to be a serious rethink if
we are to minimise the harms caused by cannabis use."

Last night, the report was welcomed by drug law reform organisations. "The
Beckley foundation are to be congratulated for the clarity of their call
for cannabis supply to be brought within government control," said Danny
Kushlick of Transform. "We look forward to the same analysis being applied
to heroin and cocaine."

The report is being launched at a two-day conference, which will be
attended by leading figures in the drugs policy world.

The conclusions are unlikely to be embraced by the government or the
Conservative party, both of which are opposed to relaxing restrictions on
cannabis use.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/oct/02/drugsandalcohol.drugspolicy

-- 
Dr John Watson
Baker Street

"Dr John Watson"  wrote in message news:6kjeqcF896h0U1@mid.individual.net...

> The conclusions are unlikely to be embraced by the government or the
> Conservative party, both of which are opposed to relaxing restrictions on
> cannabis use.
>

Naturally, why would they wish to allow reason and logic to cloud their judgement when they are so adept at ruling based on hysteria
and misinformation?

Mel

On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:15:26 -0500, in the Year of Our Lord, MelFranks,
Beloved Prophet of the Lord said:

> "Dr John Watson"  wrote in message news:6kjeqcF896h0U1@mid.individual.net...
> 
>> The conclusions are unlikely to be embraced by the government or the
>> Conservative party, both of which are opposed to relaxing restrictions on
>> cannabis use.
>>
> 
> Naturally, why would they wish to allow reason and logic to cloud their judgement when they are so adept at ruling based on hysteria
> and misinformation?
> 
> Mel

Deary deary me!

On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:50:08 +0100, Kevin  wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:15:26 -0500, in the Year of Our Lord, MelFranks,
> Beloved Prophet of the Lord said:
>
>> "Dr John Watson"  wrote in message news:6kjeqcF896h0U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>> The conclusions are unlikely to be embraced by the government or the
>>> Conservative party, both of which are opposed to relaxing restrictions on
>>> cannabis use.
>>>
>>
>> Naturally, why would they wish to allow reason and logic to cloud their judgement when they are so adept at ruling based on hysteria
>> and misinformation?
>>
>> Mel
>
> Deary deary me!

Followup abuse detected.

[plonk]

-- 
http://www.petersparrots.com    http://www.insanevideoclips.com    http://www.petersphotos.com

No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced