Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:27:34 -0500,    group: uk.politics.constitution        back       
49 OF THE RIGHT QUESTIONS THE WORKERS OF TREASON CANNOT ANSWER!!   
49 Of the Right Questions No One is Asking!  New questions In Red! 
New added question In Blue!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
08/17/2006
By Susan Williams 
1.	Why do people do everything but tell us in a free country that
people must not believe there is a conspiracy.  
 
2.	Why don't those who struggle to make sure the American people
stop saying there is a conspiracy do anything against the leaders to
make them to understand that daring and unprecedented suspicious
activity will make people believe there is a conspiracy?
 
3.	Why did the American forefathers believe there was a global
conspiracy, and why did this cause them to become "isolationists?
 
4.	Why do such people claim we are paranoid to believe that a
conspiracy exists, and stake much time and pain to get us out of that,
and remained silent when Bush saw a contained and defeated dictator
overseas and started war with him on the premise that he would destroy
America?
 
5.	Why then do lies, coverups and activities against the
Constitution of the United States then escalate so much
notwithstanding certain people get tortured by "conspiracy theorists?"
 
6.	How come in every single case reported of voter fraud,
irregularity or cheating, the only party mentioned responsible for it
is the Christian "family values" party, the Republicans, while the
amoral liberal class, the Democrats, were always innocent?
 
7.	Are creative forms of cheating crucial in re-electing George
W. Bush?
 
8.	Why does Osama and the other terrorists spend so much money to
attack the American people, knowing this will make the national
leaders who make decisions against Islam and Arabs much more powerful?
 
9.	Why do we give much more respect to these terrorists and
believe they are so much smarter when, 40 years ago, terrorists took
care of President John F. Kennedy in such a way that he was much much
weaker?
 
10.	Bush then made an illegal war against an Arab nation taking
far more lives than 911.  What will happen to the Arab and Muslim
agenda, and when will mission be accomplished by attacking the
American people instead of the leaders? when President Bush becomes an
absolute dictator?
 
11.	Why do strange people tell us that the Patriot Act is a NEW
set of laws that are vital, knowing that this country existed with its
entire history without it except for when Bush and vast team came
along?
 
12.	Why do the strange people refuse to inform us that the
principles of the Patriot Act came right out of the Inquisitions of
the Middle Ages, and that they were also practiced by the Communists
and Nazis?
 
13.	Why didn't President Bush give credit to the Inquisitions, the
Communists and the Nazis for creating and practicing the principles
contained in the Patriot Act, but claimed the formulation of it was
his, "hard decisions?"
 
14.	Why after the Patriot Act was instituted to snoop the American
people and true Americans didn't like it, did strange people dare to
ask them if they have something to hide?
 
15.	Why then, after Bush refused to testify alone and under oath
in an "independent investigation" of the most major internal tragedy
to take place against the United States at least a year after the
fact, did they not pose the question to Bush of whether or not he had
anything to hide?
 
16.	Why do such people chide us, asking us out of our concern
against the Patriot Act, that we must wait for soldiers to kick down
our doors before we find there is something wrong with this old
proposal, but then staged all kinds of political campaigns telling us
that other countries must be pre-emptively attacked before they commit
crimes, showing an abiding concept? Why did they commit even this
election fraud?  They said we must not wait neither for crimes nor
tragedies take place.
 
17.	Why after 911, President Bush didn't say, "Because of this
attack against our great nation we have to construct devices to snoop
for terrorists among the American people?"  Why were these devices
already constructed?
 
18.	If these devices then were constructed already, were they used
before 911 to snoop the American people?  If they were not used, how
could the government have known that situations would work out where
they would be necessary,  and yet entirely missed the threat of 911? 
Carnivore was revealed to the American people almost two years
previous!
 
19.	Carnivore was introduced to the American people in early 2000
under the tenure of Bill Clinton.  Why didn't Bush inform us that
snooping devices were created under Bill Clinton, but just accepted
the transition from a free country to "One Nation Under Surveillance"
as seamless as the fight to make sure the American people don't
realize there is a global conspiracy?
 
20.	Why do people tell us that 911 took place because former
President Bill Clinton failed to protect us?  They claimed he was
laxed on terror.
 
21.	Why then was former President Bill Clinton more stringent
against terrorism than all the other presidents before him?
 
22.	How come then the more backward we go into history is the more
laxed each administration was against TERROR, and yet the more
terrorism didn't bother us?  (Even the word was not in the textbooks
or anywhere else when Grandma was growing up.  Acts of war were known,
but any claim that the sky was falling and thence the Constitution
needs to be trashed by the crusaders against paranoia did not take
place, and neither did the Patriot Act: a "vital" law that was missing
for the entire spread of the existence of the United States, and that
comes only with Bush and any other New World Order regime change
devotee.  All such principles for security were only adopted by the
Communists, Nazis and other brutal regimes in contrast to America).
 
23.	Why couldn't terrorists have thought to attack us internally
before?
 
24.	Why do such people teach us that a president now unprecedented
in failing to protect the American people must be made a king and
rewarded for failing to protect us unlike all the other presidents
before him?
 
25.	Since Bush is being so fabulously rewarded for failing to
protect us, how are we going to honor those presidents before him who
did not fail to protect us?
 
26.	Besides the massive propaganda team, why were the American
people afraid to vote for John Kerry because they felt he was weak on
security issues when George Bush failed to protect the American people
unprecedented in the entire history of America?
 
27.	Why did the Supreme Court finally realize that President Bush
overstepped his authority at Guantanamo Bay acquired through failing
to protect the American people, when even multitudes of mentally
retarded folk figured that out a long time ago?  Is one requirement
for the High Court to have bad reflexes?
 
28.	Why does the Supreme Court, realizing the many unprecedented
mistakes of President Bush to even the embarrassing starting of an
illegal war in paranoia, looking for invisible WMDs to the taking of
multitudes of lives, still struggle to maintain the right to make him
a dictator and give the whole farm over to him?
 
29.	Why did President Bush become paranoid over the threat Iraq
that we beat so badly in Operation Desert Storm could pose, when, in
the late 70s while I was in college, I was informed that the
surveillance capabilities of America were good enough to see a
basketball on the ground from space?  And we still couldn't know that
Iraq had no WMDs?  Iraq didn't have these advantages of aerial
surveillance against us.
 
30.	If it is a fact that only a perfect man is eligible to be
given the right to destroy people based merely on an accusation
without due process, why does the High Court and Congress
determine--especially as shown through the confirmation of Sam Alito
to the court--that President Bush must have these rights based upon
failing to protect the American people without precedent???
 
31.	How come the Supreme Court and Congress cannot understand that
Bush has a talent to lie to billions of people?
 
32.	Why then would they want to empower him to destroy a person
merely by making an accusation considering the accuracy of much of
what he says?
 
33.	Do members of the High Court and Congress know that the
"Conspiracy Theorists" would have gotten rid of any government
official who has a talent of lying a long time ago, and that promises,
government aspirations and records cannot survive if one in the
highest office is proud of lying to the globe?
 
34.	Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange
that Bush actually showed pictures of 911 for his re-election campaign
since Bush failed to protect the American people on that fateful day?
 
35.	Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange
that a president would claim the powers of a king for failing to
protect the American people?
 
36.	Who would think there is a conspiracy and why would our
national leaders hyperventilate because Americans at least believe
there is a global one when the country saw only one politician voted
against the institution of the Patriot Act after 911, and then only
because HE READ THE PROPOSALS FIRST???
 
37.	Why then don't the American people understand that Bush cannot
be impeached without the same being done to the High Court Justices,
Republican members of Congress and most Democratic members of
Congress?
 
38.	If we consider that, for some strange reason, we have been
rather free of terror attacks before Bush, could it be because
terrorists had something to fear because of all the other presidents
before Bush?
 
39.	What then could have ended the fear terrorists had of American
presidents when Bush came besides Bush's strong efforts to sell our
ports over to the United Arab Emirates who financed 911?
 
40.	How come because of Bush's failure to protect the American
people, all the American people are automatic suspects to terrorism
when he is the only person most Americans know of who has actual
family ties to terrorists?
 
41.	Why did such people allow and fight to make us believe it is
normal for an "independent investigation" of the most major internal
tragedy in the United States take place a year after the event? 
 
42.	Why are they determined no one must believe there is something
wrong with this?
(The proper way to handle all tragedies is to stage thorough
investigation right away. That way evidence is fresh and people
interviewed will make statements that can be matched with their later
statements to test their coherency.)
 
43.	Why do such expect us to believe that under the weight of
3,000 graves, the president who failed to protect them can refuse to
testify cleanly under oath at the investigation that took place a year
later, and wound up finally testifying not under oath, but at the same
time with the second most honest person in the world (Dick Cheney)
does not give fuel to the big bad ol' "conspiracy theorists?" Just the
weight of 3,000 graves would force any American to testify trembling,
let alone their protector supposed to give them protection they paid
high taxes for!
 
44.	Why, after showing that there were no WMDs and no white man
involved blushed and many lives were lost in the process, such people
not only don't notice something wrong, but attack those who do notice?
 
45.	Why do such people then demand that no one must attack Bush,
for that makes him a "BUSH-HATER?" 
 
46.	What did Bush do wrong, other than kill our sons and daughters
for invisible WMDs and still yet does not blush, but claims he must be
made king? Why do they all get upset when people, in their honest
opinion and free rights, call Bush, Adolf Hitler II?
 
47.	Why, since the Bush Administration, did fuel prices uniquely
get so high and the American people can't figure out why, even though
Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who
were involved in financing 911?
 
48.	How come, with all of this, those who still insist we must not
know there is a conspiracy, struggle to make sure that these clearly
treasonous activities escalate day after day after day?
 
49.	What is it about all these people that empowers them not to
blush? If people all around us fundamentally have no conscience, can
more people be killed? Can the American people be rounded up, put in
detention camps and even depopulated with their blessing?


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:27:34 -0500   author:   Susan Williams

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us