Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:24:38 -0700,    group: uk.politics.animals        back       
Re: Is It Unscientific to Say that an Animal is Happy?   
pearl wrote:
> Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and
> said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and
> so he wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:42:23 -0000, "pearl"  wrote:
>>
>>> Meat and dairy animals now account for about 20 percent of all
>>> terrestrial animal biomass.
>>     Good enough.
> 
> Disrespect for species,

Psychobabble by a psychotic foot-rubbing whore.


>>> Livestock's presence in vast tracts of land
>>> and its demand for feed crops also contribute to biodiversity loss;
>>> 15 out of 24 important ecosystem services are assessed as in decline,
>>> with livestock identified as a culprit.
>> Here we see plowing:
>> http://tinyurl.com/8fmxe
> <etc.>
> 
> 'The 7 billion livestock animals in the United States consume
> five times as much grain as is consumed directly by the entire
> American population.

Irrelevant.  That grain is not "wasted".  That's the false "vegan" 
inefficiency argument, which I have shown to be bullshit.
date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:24:38 -0700   author:   Rudy Canoza

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us