On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:18:17 -0000 "pearl"  wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza"  wrote in message news:8875ce5a-d459-484f-a6ce-43442d1b60de@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 24, 1:43 pm, chico <ch...@chico.chico> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:17:46 -0800 Rudy Canoza  wrote:
> > > chico wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:18:17 -0000 "pearl"  wrote:
> > > >> "Derek"  wrote in messagenews:50ofp3hkndj9adoj75mkf72e20jukbp5s1@4ax.com...
> >
> > > >>> Thanks for that, but I read it all earlier and found that we did eat
> > > >>> meat.
> > > >> Who's "we"? What part of "*not* for purposes of provisioning,
> > > >> but in the context of competitive male displays." don't you get?
> >
> > > > You don't get it,
> 
> It's you that's not getting it, .. or pretending not to.

You don't get it, Les.
 
> > > >> Talking about evolution, there's precious little evidence of that..
> >
> > > > That's very rich coming from someone who shaved her head to seduce a violent skinhead.
> >
> > > Haw haw haw! Excellent!
> 
> It's a lie.

No, anyone can search the list Mr Canoza kindy reposted for comments from your ex-husband. Or search alt.skinheads and look for keywords like hippy, animals, bat, rainbow, etc. Or my favorite part -- "Beware the chelsea who shaves just to lure you into her lair."

> > > Glad to see you again, Mr. C.; been awhile.
> 
> Ran away after a thrashing.

You have delusions of grandeur, twat. I haven't made much time for usenet in the past year. I shouldn't this year, either, but here I am. And here you still are after years of being shown to be a flake of immense magnitudes by everything you post. Then when someone posts a list of your crazy beliefs, you deny -- in whole or in part, depending which stage of your menstrual cycle you'd be on if you weren't so malnourished from your bizarre diet and able to menstruate normally -- your positions taken throughout your years of inflicting idiocy upon usenet: as lilweed, as lys, as lotus, and as pearl.

> > I see Leslie's still having a very difficult time with this "reality" thing.
> 
> No surprise, for someone who believes
> 
> ---------------------
> 
> Part fact, part fiction.

It's fully substantiated. Anyone can look at the links and see that it's an accurate representation of your worldview and that you're a raving kook.