Our garbage...our food waste...would almost certainly be
enough to end world hunger. I feel confident that every
state, and maybe even every major city, produces 
millions of pounds of food waste every single day. That
wasted food goes to feed rats and other vermin we would
rather *not* feed in dumps and landfills, while humans we
would rather feed are starving. Much of the nutrition which 
makes life possible--any amount or form of which is rare 
and treasured to hungry people all over this planet--has
become nothing but a problem to get rid of for those of
us fortunate enough to have the "problem". Even if only
a small percentage of the people who have the problem
were to participate in organized group efforts, it's almost
certain that a large percentage of world hunger and 
starvation could be reduced or eliminated. The garbage
from McDonald's alone could save how many human 
lives?

How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
would be required on both the private and commercial 
participant level. Collection and distribution would
be on a bigger scale, and would require properly developed 
business level organizations and facilities in order to make 
productive use of what so many of us consider to be waste. 
Some sort of incentive to participate besides simply providing
life for other humans would probably also be required, or else
systems such as that would have been established and
working for years already.

How to begin? The first thing would be to accept the idea
that it would be possible, and could be made practical and 
maybe even beneficial to those who are willing to participate.
It would probably have to begin on a small scale, with groups
of interested people working together to help select other
groups and individuals in their local areas. It needs to be 
kept in mind that those who would survive and benefit from
such a change in the thinking and efforts of those who could
help them, would be dependant on the stability of the system.

But there's already a surplus of food. So would it be a waste
of time? Even if we could dry, sanitize and package millions
of pounds of nutrition from our food waste every day, would
it be of no real value? Are people who are starving just going
to have to continue to starve, regardless of how much extra
food more fortunate people have to deal with? Would they
just become another dependancy...more trouble than it would
be worth? Or could it be practical to put together a system
like that?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

Our garbage...our food waste...would almost certainly be
enough to end world hunger. I feel confident that every
state, and maybe even every major city, produces 
millions of pounds of food waste every single day. That
wasted food goes to feed rats and other vermin we would
rather *not* feed in dumps and landfills, while humans we
would rather feed are starving. Much of the nutrition which 
makes life possible--any amount or form of which is rare 
and treasured to hungry people all over this planet--has
become nothing but a problem to get rid of for those of
us fortunate enough to have the "problem". Even if only
a small percentage of the people who have the problem
were to participate in organized group efforts, it's almost
certain that a large percentage of world hunger and 
starvation could be reduced or eliminated. The garbage
from McDonald's alone could save how many human 
lives?

How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
would be required on both the private and commercial 
participant level. Collection and distribution would
be on a bigger scale, and would require properly developed 
business level organizations and facilities in order to make 
productive use of what so many of us consider to be waste. 
Some sort of incentive to participate besides simply providing
life for other humans would probably also be required, or else
systems such as that would have been established and
working for years already.

How to begin? The first thing would be to accept the idea
that it would be possible, and could be made practical and 
maybe even beneficial to those who are willing to participate.
It would probably have to begin on a small scale, with groups
of interested people working together to help select other
groups and individuals in their local areas. It needs to be 
kept in mind that those who would survive and benefit from
such a change in the thinking and efforts of those who could
help them, would be dependant on the stability of the system.

But there's already a surplus of food. So would it be a waste
of time? Even if we could dry, sanitize and package millions
of pounds of nutrition from our food waste every day, would
it be of no real value? Are people who are starving just going
to have to continue to starve, regardless of how much extra
food more fortunate people have to deal with? Would they
just become another dependancy...more trouble than it would
be worth? Or could it be practical to put together a system
like that?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>be on a bigger scale,

I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
would we?

-- 
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:05:47 +0100, Peter Duncanson  wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:02:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>How to do it? Organization and agreement to commit to
>>the projects would be a first step. What to commit to would
>>of course be a necessary consideration. How to store,
>>transfer and sanitize the waste food would be some of the
>>biggest obstacles to overcome. Making regular use of 
>>food grinders, dehydrators, possibly crushers of some sort,
>>probably UV sanitizing methods, and packaging systems 
>>would be required on both the private and commercial 
>>participant level. Collection and distribution would
>>be on a bigger scale,
>
>I hope all this will be powered by nuclear-generated electricity. We
>wouldn't like to have lots of CO2 released into the atmosphere,
>would we?

    I doubt that would be a significant issue. Maybe
the additional farting could become a concern?