rowland

x-no-archive: yes

"With a growl, android 21 flares his aura, and sets off toward his foe 
again."

http://dbzlegends82513.yuku.com/forum/viewtopic/id/724

(not one of mine, thankfully)

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> 
> "With a growl, android 21 flares his aura, and sets off toward his foe 
> again."
> 
> http://dbzlegends82513.yuku.com/forum/viewtopic/id/724
> 
> (not one of mine, thankfully)
> 
> Evil Nigel
> 

what the freak is that site talking about?

anything to do with Scientology?

"humble.life"  wrote in message 
news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
> rowland


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18925331.100-that-fridge-light.html

CJ Dunnaway wrote:
> "humble.life"  wrote in message 
> news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> rowland
> 
> 
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18925331.100-that-fridge-light.html

the world can now sleep

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> rowland

Leave the poor guy alone, don't you know he is mentally ill, this is a 
support group, shouldn't you be in luton licking foxes?

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 John  DoH <JohnDoh_@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:

> In article ,
>  "humble.life"  wrote:
> 
> > rowland
> 
> Leave the poor guy alone, don't you know he is mentally ill, this is a 
> support group, shouldn't you be in luton licking foxes?

Before Loz pops up and thinks I was referring to his imaginary lady 
friend, who is not a fox btw, it probably should have read "on his futon 
ticking boxes" :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

humble.life wrote:
> rowland

My best friend's a butcher, he has sixteen knives...

On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> rowland

Why? are you trying to be supportive?
Well guess there's a first time for everything

Chrissy wrote:
> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>> rowland
> 
> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> Well guess there's a first time for everything

you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short

i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.

Chrissy wrote:
> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>> rowland
> 
> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> Well guess there's a first time for everything


Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn 
sight more supportive than R.
R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when 
you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit 
but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and 
understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.

HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.

firemonkey wrote:
> Chrissy wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>>> rowland
>>
>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
> 
> 
> Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn 
> sight more supportive than R.
> R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when 
> you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit 
> but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and 
> understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.
> 
> HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.

i thought that might be the case but didn't like to say anything

[insert unnecessarily long description for R here]

JW wrote:
> humble.life wrote:
>> rowland
> 
> My best friend's a butcher, he has sixteen knives...

you made me google

firemonkey  wrote:

> Chrissy wrote:
> > humble.life"  wrote:
> >> rowland
> > 
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> 
> Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn
> sight more supportive than R.
> R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when
> you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit
> but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and 
> understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.

Thank you for the kindness, compassion, tolerance, and understanding
that you are showing to me here.

> HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.

Thank you for your kind, balanced, and thoughtful analysis.

Rowland.


-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Chrissy  wrote:

> "humble.life"  wrote:
> > rowland
> 
> Why? are you trying to be supportive?

Who knows what he's up to.  I rarely understand Humble's posts.  This
case is no exception.

> Well guess there's a first time for everything

I don't know what he's up to, but that's not a nice response.

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

humble.life  wrote:

> Chrissy wrote:
> > "humble.life"  wrote:
> >> rowland
> > 
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> 
> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> 
> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who
> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in
> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.

Oi, Humble, I do not understand what on Earth you are on about here, but
if you do want to have a go at me, how about doing it in private email?

Better than fucking up the newsgroup even more than it already is fucked
up.  Since I have you in my killfile, I read none of your posts in the
usual run of things so there's not a lot of point in making posts aimed
at having me read them.  The reason for me having you in my killfile is
that I do not understand most of your posts.

It seems - my current guess - that no-one except your special friends
you talk to by email could possibly understand your posts here.  Okay,
okay, if you must; I don't like that way of doing things, but there you
go.  But don't fuck things up by being bitchy here, eh?

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

humble.life  wrote:

> firemonkey wrote:
[snip]

> > HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.
> 
> i thought that might be the case but didn't like to say anything

I love you too.

> [insert unnecessarily long description for R here]

Hardly a description; more an entirely false, malicious, and generally
libellous rant.

Rowland.


-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> humble.life  wrote:
> 
>> firemonkey wrote:
> [snip]
> 
>>> HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.
>> i thought that might be the case but didn't like to say anything
> 
> I love you too.
> 
>> [insert unnecessarily long description for R here]
> 
> Hardly a description; more an entirely false, malicious, and generally
> libellous rant.
> 
> Rowland.
> 
> 
i forgive some of you but not all

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> humble.life  wrote:
> 
>> Chrissy wrote:
>>> "humble.life"  wrote:
>>>> rowland
>>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>
>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who
>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in
>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> 
> Oi, Humble, I do not understand what on Earth you are on about here, but
> if you do want to have a go at me, how about doing it in private email?
> 
> Better than fucking up the newsgroup even more than it already is fucked
> up.  Since I have you in my killfile, I read none of your posts in the
> usual run of things so there's not a lot of point in making posts aimed
> at having me read them.  The reason for me having you in my killfile is
> that I do not understand most of your posts.
> 
> It seems - my current guess - that no-one except your special friends
> you talk to by email could possibly understand your posts here.  Okay,
> okay, if you must; I don't like that way of doing things, but there you
> go.  But don't fuck things up by being bitchy here, eh?
> 
> Rowland.
> 

hi

"humble.life"  wrote in message 
news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
> rowland


He's been busy.....

http://www.rowlandspharmacy.co.uk/

Lachlan - KotU wrote:
> "humble.life"  wrote in message 
> news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> rowland
> 
> 
> He's been busy.....
> 
> http://www.rowlandspharmacy.co.uk/
> 
> 
i'll have the linctus, it sounds like it should be good

Lachlan - KotU wrote:
> "humble.life"  wrote in message 
> news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> rowland
> 
> 
> He's been busy.....
> 
> http://www.rowlandspharmacy.co.uk/
> 
> 

He should prescribe himself a dose of human decency 3x a day.

firemonkey wrote:
> Lachlan - KotU wrote:
>> "humble.life"  wrote in message 
>> news:6knhkhF8sthbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> rowland
>>
>>
>> He's been busy.....
>>
>> http://www.rowlandspharmacy.co.uk/
>>
>>
> 
> He should prescribe himself a dose of human decency 3x a day.

now now, it must take a lot of energy being that one sided that vivaciously

On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:52:26 +0100, humble.life blathered:

> hi

I think your verbose posts are overloading Rowland's brain. He can spot the
nasty, malicious note in your single word; he's just that clever.

-- 
"I'm amazed that people think I'm trolling - what kind of fuckwits are
you lot?  Have you no understanding of humanity?  No souls of your own?
Seemingly not."
Rowland McDonnel - No Souls - 22May08

On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:28 +0100, humble.life blathered:

> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> 
> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.

Well, we'll just assume here you're having a mental health episode because
you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

-- 
"Oh and there is very little that Rowland actually likes. He hates the
world, basically."
Sarah Balfour dumps on Rowland McDonnell - Oct. 26, 2007

Malicious Toad wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:28 +0100, humble.life blathered:
> 
>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>
>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> 
> Well, we'll just assume here you're having a mental health episode because
> you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
> 

every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
and you're one of them

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> Chrissy wrote:
> > On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >> rowland
> > 
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> 
> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> 
> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.

Get over yourself, you ignorant, ineffective little man, invites are not 
needed :-)

if you used as much effort to get your life on track as you use emailing 
the other lifers, bitching and whining, then you would have stopped 
ticking those boxes long ago :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> Malicious Toad wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:28 +0100, humble.life blathered:
> > 
> >> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> >>
> >> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> >> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> >> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> >> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> > 
> > Well, we'll just assume here you're having a mental health episode because
> > you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
> > 
> 
> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
> and you're one of them

Look in the mirror humble, what do you see :-)

It's not nice is it :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

humble.life wrote:
> Chrissy wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>>> rowland
>>
>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
> 
> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> 
> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> 

Oh dear, having a bad day are you?
There are too many posts to catch up with on a wet sunday morning, but 
Rowland thinks you are talking about him when I think you mean me.
Your one-liners are bizarrely oblique but when you do string together a 
few sentences, your point is still lost isn't it.
Chrissy dosen't bring me here, we have no contact. She don't like me 
anymore innit, she will never belly dance for me at the Kasbah.
As for: "inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal 
tendancies in people he doesn't perceive well", you mean the poster who 
spent a couple of years posting the same codswallop about a girlfriend 
who he cheated on blah blah blah, then posted one evening a series of 
posts clearly to mislead the rest of you that he was dying as he typed, 
that he was commiting suicide live online, Rowland fell for it hook, 
line and sinker and got very excited, I knew it was fantasy and said so,
I told the liar to pack it in, just post normally and join in and that 
is exactly what he is now doing, he was never suicidal and the subject 
is dead. You are just too gulible.
As I type I'm just having a read of some the posts and you have really 
turned on Rowland.
Now rather than post a "hi" or a pointless one-liner, also don't just 
string together a few strange and dull sentences either, have the bottle 
to name names, put together your point coherently, and be as wordy as 
you like if you want to upset anyone in particular, but try and make it 
entertainingly readable.

I'll show you how to be provocative and annoying based just on some 
threads that I'm reading through that has Rowland in full throttle and 
Nigel is exasperated, here goes:

Anyone in here a towel head? Any Islamic nutters, or females of that 
faith who live in terror of their menfolk? Just an example, but I 
understand that cesspit known as Luton is a festering hotbed of 
freeloading illegal immigrants who want to slaughter us infidels -
Ship 'em out to Canada or convert to Islam - Anyone got an opinion?

Now just watch, if someone were to post a reply, then *another poaster* 
who claims he has a magical killfile of which I am supposedly hidden in,
well he will join in the thread with his wordy pomposity, but he needs 
someone else to start the replies, he cannot be seen to have actually 
read mine or JD's, or SHT, Observer T, posts.
Try it, it is so easy to bait.

Remember, oblique one-liners are not only pointless, but dull.
Good luck.

In article 
<1ioat05.hgkmly1q3o146N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
  rowland.mcdonnell@physics.org (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> humble.life  wrote:
> 
> > Chrissy wrote:
> > > "humble.life"  wrote:
> > >> rowland
> > > 
> > > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> > 
> > you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> > 
> > i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who
> > will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> > inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in
> > people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> 
> Oi, Humble, I do not understand what on Earth you are on about here, but
> if you do want to have a go at me, how about doing it in private email?

Rowland, when you are having a go at people can you take it to private 
email instead of fucking up this group with your negativity.
> 
> Better than fucking up the newsgroup even more than it already is fucked
> up.  Since I have you in my killfile, I read none of your posts in the
> usual run of things so there's not a lot of point in making posts aimed
> at having me read them.  The reason for me having you in my killfile is
> that I do not understand most of your posts.

You read everything that could possibly be about you, read loz's email 
again he has told you that you are mistaken :-)
> 
> It seems - my current guess - that no-one except your special friends
> you talk to by email could possibly understand your posts here.  Okay,
> okay, if you must; I don't like that way of doing things, but there you
> go.  But don't fuck things up by being bitchy here, eh?

It's a two way street, stop your bitching and apologise, then take it to 
email, we don't need your sort in this support group.
> 
> Rowland.

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

On 3 Oct, 22:37, "humble.life"  wrote:
> rowland

Allodoxaphobia

Be gentle on yourself

Simon

John DoH wrote:
> In article ,
>  "humble.life"  wrote:
> 
>> Malicious Toad wrote:
>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:28 +0100, humble.life blathered:
>>>
>>>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>>>
>>>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
>>>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
>>>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
>>>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
>>> Well, we'll just assume here you're having a mental health episode because
>>> you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
>>>
>> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
>> and you're one of them
> 
> Look in the mirror humble, what do you see :-)
> 
> It's not nice is it :-)
> 
hmmmm, you're going to have to work on put-downs

John DoH wrote:
> In article ,
>  "humble.life"  wrote:
> 
>> Chrissy wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>>>> rowland
>>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>
>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> 
> Get over yourself, you ignorant, ineffective little man, invites are not 
> needed :-)
> 
> if you used as much effort to get your life on track as you use emailing 
> the other lifers, bitching and whining, then you would have stopped 
> ticking those boxes long ago :-)
> 

wrong, as it doesn't work like that

Pub L wrote:
> humble.life wrote:
>> Chrissy wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>>>> rowland
>>>
>>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
>>
>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>
>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
>>
> 
> Oh dear, having a bad day are you?
> There are too many posts to catch up with on a wet sunday morning, but 
> Rowland thinks you are talking about him when I think you mean me.
> Your one-liners are bizarrely oblique but when you do string together a 
> few sentences, your point is still lost isn't it.
> Chrissy dosen't bring me here, we have no contact. She don't like me 
> anymore innit, she will never belly dance for me at the Kasbah.
> As for: "inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal 
> tendancies in people he doesn't perceive well", you mean the poster who 
> spent a couple of years posting the same codswallop about a girlfriend 
> who he cheated on blah blah blah, then posted one evening a series of 
> posts clearly to mislead the rest of you that he was dying as he typed, 
> that he was commiting suicide live online, Rowland fell for it hook, 
> line and sinker and got very excited, I knew it was fantasy and said so,
> I told the liar to pack it in, just post normally and join in and that 
> is exactly what he is now doing, he was never suicidal and the subject 
> is dead. You are just too gulible.
> As I type I'm just having a read of some the posts and you have really 
> turned on Rowland.
> Now rather than post a "hi" or a pointless one-liner, also don't just 
> string together a few strange and dull sentences either, have the bottle 
> to name names, put together your point coherently, and be as wordy as 
> you like if you want to upset anyone in particular, but try and make it 
> entertainingly readable.
> 
> I'll show you how to be provocative and annoying based just on some 
> threads that I'm reading through that has Rowland in full throttle and 
> Nigel is exasperated, here goes:
> 
> Anyone in here a towel head? Any Islamic nutters, or females of that 
> faith who live in terror of their menfolk? Just an example, but I 
> understand that cesspit known as Luton is a festering hotbed of 
> freeloading illegal immigrants who want to slaughter us infidels -
> Ship 'em out to Canada or convert to Islam - Anyone got an opinion?
> 
> Now just watch, if someone were to post a reply, then *another poaster* 
> who claims he has a magical killfile of which I am supposedly hidden in,
> well he will join in the thread with his wordy pomposity, but he needs 
> someone else to start the replies, he cannot be seen to have actually 
> read mine or JD's, or SHT, Observer T, posts.
> Try it, it is so easy to bait.
> 
> Remember, oblique one-liners are not only pointless, but dull.
> Good luck.
> 

too many words, we've been through all of this,
my realisations and opinions haven't changed

x-no-archive: yes

Hmmm, UPSD on Gargoyle Gropes doesn't seem to be updating properly. I
expect the Chinese asked for it to be censored.

Pub L wrote:

> Nigel

I saw what you did.

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> 
> Hmmm, UPSD on Gargoyle Gropes doesn't seem to be updating properly. I
> expect the Chinese asked for it to be censored.
> 
> Pub L wrote:
> 
>> Nigel
> 
> I saw what you did.
> 
> Evil Nigel
> 
> 
> 

You just haven't got the hang of baiting have you, he won't jump into 
the thread unless you disect Ibsen, bang on about the pro's and con's of 
Loz converting to towel headed Islam, well he is in Luton and it is 
compulsory, he is now a Mullah. You have to include a link to the BBC
championing the the plus points of Aspergers (And they are, but you find 
and post the link). If you poasted just to bait Rowland you will have to 
do better than "I saw what you did".
Now try again.

On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:44:38 +0100, humble.life blathered:

> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
> and you're one of them

O-o-oKa-a-a-ay. Sure thing.

-- 
"He's taken it upon himself to attack me and hound me and generally
behave very nastily towards me because he's decided to hate me and so
feels justified in his vile and nasty behaviour towards me."
Trollin' Rowland McDonnell finds a new enemy - 03 Dec 07

Malicious Toad wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:44:38 +0100, humble.life blathered:
> 
>> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
>> and you're one of them
> 
> O-o-oKa-a-a-ay. Sure thing.
> 

that which we don't understand, we deride...

"humble.life"  wrote in message 
news:6ks9o0F9fe59U2@mid.individual.net...
> John DoH wrote:
>> In article ,
>>  "humble.life"  wrote:
>>
>>> Chrissy wrote:
>>>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
>>>>> rowland
>>>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>>>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
>>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
>>>
>>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group 
>>> who will know that this is still about you being an idiot, 
>>> continuously inviting someone in here who insists on driving 
>>> suicidal tendancies in people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so 
>>> forth.
>>
>> Get over yourself, you ignorant, ineffective little man, invites are 
>> not needed :-)
>>
>> if you used as much effort to get your life on track as you use 
>> emailing the other lifers, bitching and whining, then you would have 
>> stopped ticking those boxes long ago :-)
>>
>
> wrong, as it doesn't work like that


I suspect he hates his job working with people having psychological 
issues and feels powerless to do anything about it, so he comes here and 
vents his frustrations on us so he can feel powerful again. He's just a 
sad little man - ignore him.

CJ

On Oct 4, 5:18 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> Chrissy wrote:
> > On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >> rowland
>
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
>
> you have a short memory

Don't think so

and you think everyone elses is as short

No, I don't

>
> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group

I'm really that important to you?

 who
> will know that this is still about you being an idiot,

lol, well for an idiot I seem to be doing very well for myself

> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in
> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.

I never ever did that but I do understand that you still believe I
did, 2  2 = ?

I always had a soft spot for you but you always saw my support to you
as some sort of master plan I had to form a 'gang' to take over this
group, you're an intelligent person, start thinking outside the box
you've made, consider the seemingly inconsiderable - that you may have
made a mistake?
At least you are being honest now in your attacks on people, I never
saw through your snide remarks to me until you shocked me with your
attacks on me.
Believe what you want but 2 things kid, I genuinely hope you can sort
your life out & see things more clearly than you seem to me to do &
secondly, I really don't care what you personally think of me other
than you do some personal work & realise it's at least possible that
some of your views may be warped by your own mind sets.

Take care & I mean that genuinely, of course, you may not be able to
accept that.

On Oct 4, 5:34 pm, firemonkey  wrote:
> Chrissy wrote:
> > On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >> rowland
>
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
>
> Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn
> sight more supportive than R.
> R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when
> you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit
> but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and
> understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.
>
> HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like RI see your point but I don't like threads that start with just a knock
at someone else - what's the point in that?, personally I don't
remember reading HL being particularly supportive of anyone else but
maybe he has changed this year, I haven't been reading for a while.

On Oct 4, 6:06 pm, real-address-in-...@flur.bltigibbet (Rowland
McDonnell) wrote:
> Chrissy  wrote:
> > "humble.life"  wrote:
> > > rowland
>
> > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
>
> Who knows what he's up to.  I rarely understand Humble's posts.  This
> case is no exception.

LOL
right

>
> > Well guess there's a first time for everything
>
> I don't know what he's up to, but that's not a nice response.

True
>
> Rowland.
>
> --
> Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonn...@dog.physics.org
>                                             Sorry - the spam got to mehttp://www.mag-uk.org                           http://www.bmf.co.uk
> UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

In article 
,
 Chrissy  wrote:

> On Oct 4, 6:06 pm, real-address-in-...@flur.bltigibbet (Rowland
> McDonnell) wrote:
> > Chrissy  wrote:
> > > "humble.life"  wrote:
> > > > rowland
> >
> > > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> >
> > Who knows what he's up to.  I rarely understand Humble's posts.  This
> > case is no exception.
> 
> LOL
> right
> 
> >
> > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >
> > I don't know what he's up to, but that's not a nice response.
> 
> True

Chrissy dear, you are backing the wrong horse, Rowland can never give 
you what you want :-) He's a nag, the knackers yard is calling him :-)
> >
> > Rowland.
> >
> > --
> > Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonn...@dog.physics.org
> >                                             Sorry - the spam got to 
> > mehttp://www.mag-uk.org                           http://www.bmf.co.uk
> > UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article 
,
 Chrissy  wrote:

> On Oct 4, 5:34 pm, firemonkey  wrote:
> > Chrissy wrote:
> > > On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> > >> rowland
> >
> > > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >
> > Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn
> > sight more supportive than R.
> > R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when
> > you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit
> > but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and
> > understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.
> >
> > HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.
> 
> I see your point but I don't like threads that start with just a knock
> at someone else - what's the point in that?, personally I don't
> remember reading HL being particularly supportive of anyone else but
> maybe he has changed this year, I haven't been reading for a while.

You remember quite right :-) HL will come to the aide of his frail 
wives, Loz and Tim, but you are just a harridan to HL, you overpower him 
:-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> Malicious Toad wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:44:38 +0100, humble.life blathered:
> > 
> >> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
> >> and you're one of them
> > 
> > O-o-oKa-a-a-ay. Sure thing.
> > 
> 
> that which we don't understand, we deride...

You may deride it, but I couldn't possibly comment :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article <gcauab$se1$1@aioe.org>, nigel  wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
> 
> Hmmm, UPSD on Gargoyle Gropes doesn't seem to be updating properly. I
> expect the Chinese asked for it to be censored.
> 
> Pub L wrote:
> 
> > Nigel
> 
> I saw what you did.
> 
> Evil Nigel

Gay nige, you are just recycling hl's old phrases, they weren't cute 
then, but from you they are even less :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> Pub L wrote:
> > humble.life wrote:
> >> Chrissy wrote:
> >>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >>>> rowland
> >>>
> >>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> >>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >>
> >> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> >>
> >> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> >> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> >> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> >> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> >>
> > 
> > Oh dear, having a bad day are you?
> > There are too many posts to catch up with on a wet sunday morning, but 
> > Rowland thinks you are talking about him when I think you mean me.
> > Your one-liners are bizarrely oblique but when you do string together a 
> > few sentences, your point is still lost isn't it.
> > Chrissy dosen't bring me here, we have no contact. She don't like me 
> > anymore innit, she will never belly dance for me at the Kasbah.
> > As for: "inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal 
> > tendancies in people he doesn't perceive well", you mean the poster who 
> > spent a couple of years posting the same codswallop about a girlfriend 
> > who he cheated on blah blah blah, then posted one evening a series of 
> > posts clearly to mislead the rest of you that he was dying as he typed, 
> > that he was commiting suicide live online, Rowland fell for it hook, 
> > line and sinker and got very excited, I knew it was fantasy and said so,
> > I told the liar to pack it in, just post normally and join in and that 
> > is exactly what he is now doing, he was never suicidal and the subject 
> > is dead. You are just too gulible.
> > As I type I'm just having a read of some the posts and you have really 
> > turned on Rowland.
> > Now rather than post a "hi" or a pointless one-liner, also don't just 
> > string together a few strange and dull sentences either, have the bottle 
> > to name names, put together your point coherently, and be as wordy as 
> > you like if you want to upset anyone in particular, but try and make it 
> > entertainingly readable.
> > 
> > I'll show you how to be provocative and annoying based just on some 
> > threads that I'm reading through that has Rowland in full throttle and 
> > Nigel is exasperated, here goes:
> > 
> > Anyone in here a towel head? Any Islamic nutters, or females of that 
> > faith who live in terror of their menfolk? Just an example, but I 
> > understand that cesspit known as Luton is a festering hotbed of 
> > freeloading illegal immigrants who want to slaughter us infidels -
> > Ship 'em out to Canada or convert to Islam - Anyone got an opinion?
> > 
> > Now just watch, if someone were to post a reply, then *another poaster* 
> > who claims he has a magical killfile of which I am supposedly hidden in,
> > well he will join in the thread with his wordy pomposity, but he needs 
> > someone else to start the replies, he cannot be seen to have actually 
> > read mine or JD's, or SHT, Observer T, posts.
> > Try it, it is so easy to bait.
> > 
> > Remember, oblique one-liners are not only pointless, but dull.
> > Good luck.
> > 
> 
> too many words, we've been through all of this,
> my realisations and opinions haven't changed

That's your trouble hl, you can't move on, you are a lifer :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> John DoH wrote:
> > In article ,
> >  "humble.life"  wrote:
> > 
> >> Chrissy wrote:
> >>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >>>> rowland
> >>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> >>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> >>
> >> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> >> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> >> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> >> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> > 
> > Get over yourself, you ignorant, ineffective little man, invites are not 
> > needed :-)
> > 
> > if you used as much effort to get your life on track as you use emailing 
> > the other lifers, bitching and whining, then you would have stopped 
> > ticking those boxes long ago :-)
> > 
> 
> wrong, as it doesn't work like that

Sure, not for you it doesn't, you can't let go of the boxes :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

Chrissy  wrote:

> (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:
> > Chrissy  wrote:
[snip]

> > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >
> > I don't know what he's up to, but that's not a nice response.
> 
> True

Cries of pot and kettle might well arise, but...

Look, I think humble's being a bit of a shit towards me at the moment,
and it's making this newsgroup a worse place.  But what's the point in
me making any posts about that?  Not a lot - anything I post will just
make something bad even worse.

And I'm really, really sure that it's unhelpful to chuck comments like
yours at him - I mean, I don't know what humble's up to most of the
time, but - well, it's not nice, digging at people like that and I think
it'd be nice if people here could be nice to each other, you know?

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

In article <rT7Gk.2321$x%.1029@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>,
 "CJ Dunnaway"  wrote:

> "humble.life"  wrote in message 
> news:6ks9o0F9fe59U2@mid.individual.net...
> > John DoH wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >>  "humble.life"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Chrissy wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 3, 10:37 pm, "humble.life"  wrote:
> >>>>> rowland
> >>>> Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> >>>> Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> >>>
> >>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group 
> >>> who will know that this is still about you being an idiot, 
> >>> continuously inviting someone in here who insists on driving 
> >>> suicidal tendancies in people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so 
> >>> forth.
> >>
> >> Get over yourself, you ignorant, ineffective little man, invites are 
> >> not needed :-)
> >>
> >> if you used as much effort to get your life on track as you use 
> >> emailing the other lifers, bitching and whining, then you would have 
> >> stopped ticking those boxes long ago :-)
> >>
> >
> > wrong, as it doesn't work like that
> 
> 
> I suspect

Is there a bat around ?

> he hates his job

I don't really have a job as you would understand it :-)

> working with people having psychological issues

CJ, have you been taking illegal substances, tonight :-)

> and feels powerless

How powerless do you mean, powerless enough to stop a daughter, for 
example, to beat me about the head with a baseball bat for being a 
complete and utter asshole :-)

> to do anything about it,

How did you deal with your daughter beating you about your head with a 
baseball bat, it would be quite interesting to hear about that.

> so he comes here and vents his frustrations on us

are you wet, yet :-)

> so he can feel powerful again.

Don't you have to browbeat your daughter to feel powerful :-)

> He's just a  sad little man

I would have to call myself CJ and traumatise my daughter to be that sad 
:-)

> - ignore him.

You can't why do you think hl can :-)

Are you back with you wife? Or is she getting her favours elsewhere :-)
> 
> CJ

Remember, Rowland doesn't rate you if you are not using your own name :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article ,
 "humble.life"  wrote:

> John DoH wrote:
> > In article ,
> >  "humble.life"  wrote:
> > 
> >> Malicious Toad wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:28 +0100, humble.life blathered:
> >>>
> >>>> you have a short memory and you think everyone elses is as short
> >>>>
> >>>> i'm sure there are people who i have emailed outside of the group who 
> >>>> will know that this is still about you being an idiot, continuously 
> >>>> inviting someone in here who insists on driving suicidal tendancies in 
> >>>> people he doesn't perceive well, so on and so forth.
> >>> Well, we'll just assume here you're having a mental health episode because
> >>> you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
> >>>
> >> every synapse that makes a stranger interact with another has a reason
> >> and you're one of them
> > 
> > Look in the mirror humble, what do you see :-)
> > 
> > It's not nice is it :-)
> > 
> hmmmm, you're going to have to work on put-downs

It wasn't a put-down h, it was a wake-up call :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article <1iod640.vhjbwuzszqieN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
 real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> Chrissy  wrote:
> 
> > (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:
> > > Chrissy  wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> > >
> > > I don't know what he's up to, but that's not a nice response.
> > 
> > True
> 
> Cries of pot and kettle might well arise, but...

Yes, but only from a fuckwit :-)
> 
> Look, I think humble's being a bit of a shit towards me at the moment,

No, you think he is a shit towards you all the time, and you may not be 
that far off the mark, if you would only admit it :-)

> and it's making this newsgroup a worse place.

No, that's what you do.

> But what's the point in me making any posts about that?  Not a lot - 
> anything I post will just make something bad even worse.

Ah, so you have been reading my advice, well done for admitting it, you 
are still not a real man, but well done all the same:-)
> 
> And I'm really, really sure that it's unhelpful to chuck comments like
> yours at him 


Yeah, but your comments towards Chrissy are even more unhelpful. It 
would be better if you just did a Sarah to be honest, we don't need 
negative vibes in our support group, take it to email if you can't be 
supportive.

>- I mean, I don't know what humble's up to most of the time,

He's just trying to get laid, so if you were nicer to him, your futon 
may see a bit of action sooner than later.

> but - well, it's not nice, digging at people like that and I think
> it'd be nice if people here could be nice to each other, you know?

Have you been nice to humble, recently? You sure as hell haven't been 
nice to Tim or Chrissy.
> 
> Rowland.

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

"John DoH" <JohnDoh_@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message 
news:JohnDoh_-1548F5.00483706102008@unknown.ams.astraweb.com...
>> > wrong, as it doesn't work like that
>>
>>
>> I suspect
>
> Is there a bat around ?
>
>> he hates his job
>
> I don't really have a job as you would understand it :-)
>
>> working with people having psychological issues
>
> CJ, have you been taking illegal substances, tonight :-)
>
>> and feels powerless
>
> How powerless do you mean, powerless enough to stop a daughter, for
> example, to beat me about the head with a baseball bat for being a
> complete and utter asshole :-)
>
>> to do anything about it,
>
> How did you deal with your daughter beating you about your head with a
> baseball bat, it would be quite interesting to hear about that.
>
>> so he comes here and vents his frustrations on us
>
> are you wet, yet :-)
>
>> so he can feel powerful again.
>
> Don't you have to browbeat your daughter to feel powerful :-)
>
>> He's just a  sad little man
>
> I would have to call myself CJ and traumatise my daughter to be that 
> sad
> :-)
>
>> - ignore him.
>
> You can't why do you think hl can :-)
>
> Are you back with you wife? Or is she getting her favours elsewhere 
> :-)
>>
>> CJ
>
> Remember, Rowland doesn't rate you if you are not using your own name 
> :-)


I'm sorry John, but psychologically healthy adults, ones that actually 
have lives and don't suffer from petty insecurities, generally don't 
hang out in depression newsgroups and harass people. Only a sad little 
man would feel powerful by attacking others he deemed to be weaker than 
himself. You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you 
really need to grow up, son.

CJ Dunnaway  wrote:

[snip]

> You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you 
> really need to grow up, son. 

(Son?  No, you are human: you cannot have sired that creature)

Actually, it's a lot more cowardly than a schoolyard bully: a schoolyard
bully runs the risk of getting his head kicked in.  Usenet trolls do not
- short of expensive and difficult detective work, it's nigh on
impossible to track these creatures down.

They hide behind false names and anonymous accounts and so on.

I mean, what sort of creature takes pleasure from persecuting the
mentally ill, eh?[1]

They're all sick saddos, every one of them.

Rowland.

[1]  Aside from psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and similar scum.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Chrissy  wrote:

> firemonkey  wrote:
> > Chrissy wrote:
> > > "humble.life"  wrote:
> > >> rowland
> >
> > > Why? are you trying to be supportive?
> > > Well guess there's a first time for everything
> >
> > Are you saying that HL  has never been supportive here? IMO he's a damn
> > sight more supportive than R.
> > R is a nasty little hypocritical shite who thinks it ok to kick you when
> > you are down and shows no tolerance or understanding when you feel shit
> > but then expects you to show him the compassion/tolerance/and
> > understanding he didn't give to you when he is down.
> >
> > HL is infinitely more preferable than a bad mannered obnoxious oik like R.
> 
> I see your point but I don't like threads that start with just a knock
> at someone else - what's the point in that?, personally I don't
> remember reading HL being particularly supportive of anyone else but
> maybe he has changed this year, I haven't been reading for a while.

Humble might not be supportive directly, but he rarely puts the boot in.

But sometimes he does.  Thing is, Humble Life putting the boot in in his
most vicious fashion is less obnoxious than firemonkey's normal posting
style.

Humble dislikes me because I don't post one-liners like he does - don't
ask me why, but he dislikes people who make long posts.  I do wish he'd
stop being nasty about it.  I can't understand his posts and consider
them a complete waste of time, so I just ignore him.  I don't feel any
need to get *nasty* about it, not like Humble does.

I like to think that I've never behaved as obnoxiously as firemonkey to
any person posting on Usenet - trolls, of course, not counting as
persons.  For sure I'll drop criticism in at times, but always specific,
always directly to the person who's got things wrong.

I never post the sort of crass, baseless vileness that firemonkey's
spewing around the place - you'll notice that he's just made some
baseless claims about me, ranting about about Christ only knows what,
except that his complaint about me is not merely a lie, but is in fact
the criticism I levelled at him.

Amazing, really - I accuse firemonkey of something, and how does he
respond?  Leaves things to fester for a while, and then vomits his angry
lies about me all over this newsgroup - accusing me of doing what I
caught him out at!

Rowland.
(pulling out his pedantry and not caring who sees)

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

humble.life  wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
[snip]

> > Hardly a description; more an entirely false, malicious, and generally
> > libellous rant.
> > 
> i forgive some of you but not all

Go stick your head in a goat.

I view you with the same dislike that I formed years ago.  You've got
nastier, if anything.

Why not just ignore me if you don't like my posts, eh?  Why get nasty
about it?  Do I make nasty posts about the fact that you've never
supported anyone here and almost never made a post worth making?

Do I get nasty about the fact that almost all your posts make no sense
at all, mostly because they mean nothing to people who are not part of
your special group of friends whom you keep in contact with via email?
The rest of us stand no chance understanding your posts, do we?  Do I
get nasty about your cliquiness?  No, I just ignore it.

And how do you respond in return?  You just get nasty.  Humble, this
place is supposed to be for *support*.  If you get the urge to put the
boot in to a non-troll posting here, just don't do it.

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

"Rowland McDonnell" <real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> wrote in 
message 
news:1iodctz.l2komp1upp4evN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet...
> CJ Dunnaway  wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you
>> really need to grow up, son.
>
> (Son?  No, you are human: you cannot have sired that creature)
>
> Actually, it's a lot more cowardly than a schoolyard bully: a 
> schoolyard
> bully runs the risk of getting his head kicked in.  Usenet trolls do 
> not
> - short of expensive and difficult detective work, it's nigh on
> impossible to track these creatures down.
>
> They hide behind false names and anonymous accounts and so on.
>
> I mean, what sort of creature takes pleasure from persecuting the
> mentally ill, eh?[1]
>
> They're all sick saddos, every one of them.
>
> Rowland.
>
> [1]  Aside from psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and similar scum.

Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
jerks, but I'm lying to myself. I used to enjoy coming here and 
chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not 
helping and I don't want to do it anymore. If the trolls are trying to 
drive people away, they are succeeding. I think I've about had enough.

CJ

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> humble.life  wrote:
> 
>> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> [snip]
> 
>>> Hardly a description; more an entirely false, malicious, and generally
>>> libellous rant.
>>>
>> i forgive some of you but not all
> 
> Go stick your head in a goat.
> 
> I view you with the same dislike that I formed years ago.  You've got
> nastier, if anything.
> 
> Why not just ignore me if you don't like my posts, eh?  Why get nasty
> about it?  Do I make nasty posts about the fact that you've never
> supported anyone here and almost never made a post worth making?
> 
> Do I get nasty about the fact that almost all your posts make no sense
> at all, mostly because they mean nothing to people who are not part of
> your special group of friends whom you keep in contact with via email?
> The rest of us stand no chance understanding your posts, do we?  Do I
> get nasty about your cliquiness?  No, I just ignore it.
> 
> And how do you respond in return?  You just get nasty.  Humble, this
> place is supposed to be for *support*.  If you get the urge to put the
> boot in to a non-troll posting here, just don't do it.
> 
> Rowland.
> 

you, you, you, you

CJ Dunnaway  wrote:

[snip]

> Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
> jerks, but I'm lying to myself.

<grin>  But I *can* ignore 'em - well, most of the time.  Sometimes I
see their posts quoted...  Killfile, that's the trick.

> I used to enjoy coming here and 
> chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not
> helping and I don't want to do it anymore.

Killfiles are the answer.

> If the trolls are trying to 
> drive people away, they are succeeding.

Not quite everyone - they need just enough people left for them to play
`prod the loony and watch him howl'.

On the other hand, if there were a decent number of decent posters here
who didn't encourage the trolls to stay (you hear me, Chrissy and Loz
and humble life?) but told 'em to sod off and/or ignored them, then the
trolls would go away.

The trolls here have followed me to some of the other newsgroups I
infest.  They were seen off instantly in both cases, because those
newsgroups are full of Usenet-savvy people who know how to spot a troll
and what to do with one.

For some reason, rather a lot of posters here like encouraging the
trolls by engaging them in conversation.

And *one* of that lot - Loz - has the gall to suggest that I'm
encouraging the scum to stay!  Loz, no, it's *YOU* who is doing that,
you silly sod.

> I think I've about had enough.

If you got yourself a newsreader with a kill file/block list/something
of that nature, then you'd be able to avoid their posts entirely.

I can recommend MacSoup or Nemo.  Both need a, erm, Mac (on the other
hand, MacSoup will run on almost any Mac you're likely to find in the
wild these days, no matter how old or clunky).

Rowland.



-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

x-no-archive: yes

CJ Dunnaway wrote:

> 
> Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
> jerks, but I'm lying to myself. I used to enjoy coming here and 
> chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not 
> helping and I don't want to do it anymore. If the trolls are trying to 
> drive people away, they are succeeding. I think I've about had enough.
> 
> CJ
> 

(((CJD)))

Evil Nigel

humble.life wrote:

> you, you, you, you

So true

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> CJ Dunnaway  wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
>> jerks, but I'm lying to myself.
> 
> <grin>  But I *can* ignore 'em - well, most of the time.  Sometimes I
> see their posts quoted...  Killfile, that's the trick.
> 
>> I used to enjoy coming here and 
>> chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not
>> helping and I don't want to do it anymore.
> 
> Killfiles are the answer.
> 
>> If the trolls are trying to 
>> drive people away, they are succeeding.
> 
> Not quite everyone - they need just enough people left for them to play
> `prod the loony and watch him howl'.
> 
> On the other hand, if there were a decent number of decent posters here
> who didn't encourage the trolls to stay (you hear me, Chrissy and Loz
> and humble life?) but told 'em to sod off and/or ignored them, then the
> trolls would go away.
> 
> The trolls here have followed me to some of the other newsgroups I
> infest.  They were seen off instantly in both cases, because those
> newsgroups are full of Usenet-savvy people who know how to spot a troll
> and what to do with one.
> 
> For some reason, rather a lot of posters here like encouraging the
> trolls by engaging them in conversation.
> 
> And *one* of that lot - Loz - has the gall to suggest that I'm
> encouraging the scum to stay!  Loz, no, it's *YOU* who is doing that,
> you silly sod.
> 
>> I think I've about had enough.
> 
> If you got yourself a newsreader with a kill file/block list/something
> of that nature, then you'd be able to avoid their posts entirely.
> 
> I can recommend MacSoup or Nemo.  Both need a, erm, Mac (on the other
> hand, MacSoup will run on almost any Mac you're likely to find in the
> wild these days, no matter how old or clunky).
> 
> Rowland.
> 
> 
You can sometimes be a right prat Rowland, you haven't got anyone 
killfiled, you dare not risk missing a single word posted, you find me 
compulsive reading - you're hooked.
And CJD uses Windows Mail which is without doubt the best client 
currently available, unfortunately it is exclusive to the awful Vista.
But if he wants to filter any poaster he has the best client for the 
task, but he won't, he too is addicted.
Have you put in your complaint about the dentist yet, you know the 
dental treatment that was painful, now that is a surprise.

Do you have freckles?

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:22:24 +0100, Pub L blathered:

> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
>> CJ Dunnaway  wrote:
>> 
>> [snip]
>> 
>>> Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
>>> jerks, but I'm lying to myself.
>> 
>> <grin>  But I *can* ignore 'em - well, most of the time.  Sometimes I
>> see their posts quoted...  Killfile, that's the trick.
>> 
>>> I used to enjoy coming here and 
>>> chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not
>>> helping and I don't want to do it anymore.
>> 
>> Killfiles are the answer.
>> 
>>> If the trolls are trying to 
>>> drive people away, they are succeeding.
>> 
>> Not quite everyone - they need just enough people left for them to play
>> `prod the loony and watch him howl'.
>> 
>> On the other hand, if there were a decent number of decent posters here
>> who didn't encourage the trolls to stay (you hear me, Chrissy and Loz
>> and humble life?) but told 'em to sod off and/or ignored them, then the
>> trolls would go away.
>> 
>> The trolls here have followed me to some of the other newsgroups I
>> infest.  They were seen off instantly in both cases, because those
>> newsgroups are full of Usenet-savvy people who know how to spot a troll
>> and what to do with one.
>> 
>> For some reason, rather a lot of posters here like encouraging the
>> trolls by engaging them in conversation.
>> 
>> And *one* of that lot - Loz - has the gall to suggest that I'm
>> encouraging the scum to stay!  Loz, no, it's *YOU* who is doing that,
>> you silly sod.
>> 
>>> I think I've about had enough.
>> 
>> If you got yourself a newsreader with a kill file/block list/something
>> of that nature, then you'd be able to avoid their posts entirely.
>> 
>> I can recommend MacSoup or Nemo.  Both need a, erm, Mac (on the other
>> hand, MacSoup will run on almost any Mac you're likely to find in the
>> wild these days, no matter how old or clunky).
>> 
>> Rowland.
>> 
>> 
> You can sometimes be a right prat Rowland, you haven't got anyone 
> killfiled, you dare not risk missing a single word posted, you find me 
> compulsive reading - you're hooked.

I know I don't miss a single poast of yours. They're just that good!

> And CJD uses Windows Mail which is without doubt the best client 
> currently available, unfortunately it is exclusive to the awful Vista.
> But if he wants to filter any poaster he has the best client for the 
> task, but he won't, he too is addicted.

I don't know, I think CJ and Rowland should just get a room. Throw off the
inhibitions for a change.

> Have you put in your complaint about the dentist yet, you know the 
> dental treatment that was painful, now that is a surprise.

The dentist hurting... what's the world coming to?

> 
> Do you have freckles?

Only CJ knows for sure!

-- 
"You are a deeply unpleasent insulting person, and I don't see a need to
make allowances for the fact you obviously have issues."
Woody to Rowland McDonnell - Feb 2, 2008

On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:02:45 -0500, CJ Dunnaway wrote:
> Yeah. Well, I can pretend it doesn't bother me and just ignore the 
> jerks, but I'm lying to myself. I used to enjoy coming here and 
> chatting, but now it just makes me tired. I don't need this - it's not 
> helping and I don't want to do it anymore. If the trolls are trying to 
> drive people away, they are succeeding. I think I've about had enough.

CJ, CJ. Buck up old chap. You have a bad case of Rowlanditis. It's caused
by getting too close to Rowland, but fortunately it's easily cured. Just
put Rowlie in your kill file with the trolls. I wish Rowland would post a
list because I can't make out who they are.

Now don't go storming off like last time when you told us all to fuck off.
You know you can't stay away long. Too many people here love you.

By the way, how's the blog? I haven't seen you post an update recently.

-- 
" And most shrinks are shits.  From personal experience, 
I'd say about 80% of them are unfit for purpose and really 
ought to be taken outside and shot for the evil
that they have done."
Rowland McDonnel - Violent Fantasies - 17 Dec 07

In article <lkeGk.2770$YU2.843@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com>,
 "CJ Dunnaway"  wrote:

> "John DoH" <JohnDoh_@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:JohnDoh_-1548F5.00483706102008@unknown.ams.astraweb.com...
> >> > wrong, as it doesn't work like that
> >>
> >>
> >> I suspect
> >
> > Is there a bat around ?
> >
> >> he hates his job
> >
> > I don't really have a job as you would understand it :-)
> >
> >> working with people having psychological issues
> >
> > CJ, have you been taking illegal substances, tonight :-)
> >
> >> and feels powerless
> >
> > How powerless do you mean, powerless enough to stop a daughter, for
> > example, to beat me about the head with a baseball bat for being a
> > complete and utter asshole :-)
> >
> >> to do anything about it,
> >
> > How did you deal with your daughter beating you about your head with a
> > baseball bat, it would be quite interesting to hear about that.
> >
> >> so he comes here and vents his frustrations on us
> >
> > are you wet, yet :-)
> >
> >> so he can feel powerful again.
> >
> > Don't you have to browbeat your daughter to feel powerful :-)
> >
> >> He's just a  sad little man
> >
> > I would have to call myself CJ and traumatise my daughter to be that 
> > sad
> > :-)
> >
> >> - ignore him.
> >
> > You can't why do you think hl can :-)
> >
> > Are you back with you wife? Or is she getting her favours elsewhere 
> > :-)
> >>
> >> CJ
> >
> > Remember, Rowland doesn't rate you if you are not using your own name 
> > :-)
> 
> 
> I'm sorry John,

No, you are not.

> but psychologically healthy adults, ones that actually 
> have lives and don't suffer from petty insecurities,

When you say those who "actually have lives and don't suffer from petty 
insecurities? do you mean those who don't have blogs, spewing out their 
insecurities? You know the type, the sort who mentally abuse their 
children to the extent that one day the said children may rise up and 
strike down the abusers.

> generally don't hang out in depression newsgroups and harass people. 
> Only a sad little man would feel powerful by attacking others he 
> deemed to be weaker than himself.

Well, that the trouble, Rowland has been causing problems here for years 
by attacking others he deemed to be weaker than himsel, you being new to 
our group and quite enamoured by Rowland's flattery obviously turn a 
blind eye and the other cheek, but you seem to have described him quite 
well.

> You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you really need 
> to grow up, son. 

CJ, Rowland has taught you well, deny all self-faults and turn the blame 
onto your victims.

You won't get rid of me CJ, I never give in to bullies like you and the 
rest of Rowland's sycophants. I will continue to help the lifers here 
the best way I know, you may call it tough love, but it works. Now go 
and sit in the corner you ineffective little man and think about the 
harm you are causing to our support group, we don't need the likes of 
you messing things up :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article 
<1iodctz.l2komp1upp4evN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
  rowland.mcdonnell@physics.org (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> CJ Dunnaway  wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you 
> > really need to grow up, son. 
> 
> (Son?  No, you are human: you cannot have sired that creature)

Why do you say that, Rowland, is it because I have never whacked him 
with a baseball bat :-)
> 
> Actually, it's a lot more cowardly than a schoolyard bully: a schoolyard
> bully runs the risk of getting his head kicked in.  Usenet trolls do not
> - short of expensive and difficult detective work, it's nigh on
> impossible to track these creatures down.
> 
> They hide behind false names and anonymous accounts and so on.
> 
> I mean, what sort of creature takes pleasure from persecuting the
> mentally ill, eh?[1]

Well you do, Rowland, you have recently been having a go at Tim, loz and 
Humble, you can't hide your persecution of Tim behind one post 
pretending to be supportive, we all know that was just to give Tim a 
false sense of security so that he will start to reply to you again :-)
> 
> They're all sick saddos, every one of them.

You most certainly are :-)
> 
> Rowland.
> 
> [1]  Aside from psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and similar scum.

Ah, one of your favourite rants, what a loon :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article <F5gGk.2774$YU2.2151@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com>,
 "CJ Dunnaway"  wrote:

> "Rowland McDonnell"  wrote in 
> message 
> news:1iodctz.l2komp1upp4evN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet...
> > CJ Dunnaway  wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> You are the Usenet version of a schoolyard bully, and you
> >> really need to grow up, son.
> >
> > (Son?  No, you are human: you cannot have sired that creature)
> >
> > Actually, it's a lot more cowardly than a schoolyard bully: a 
> > schoolyard
> > bully runs the risk of getting his head kicked in.  Usenet trolls do 
> > not
> > - short of expensive and difficult detective work, it's nigh on
> > impossible to track these creatures down.
> >
> > They hide behind false names and anonymous accounts and so on.
> >
> > I mean, what sort of creature takes pleasure from persecuting the
> > mentally ill, eh?[1]
> >
> > They're all sick saddos, every one of them.
> >
> > Rowland.
> >
> > [1]