I have.

I have just completed a task.

I should feel good about it, but I don't.  Never mind.  Keep at it.
Getting something done is a lot better than my usual failure to get
anything done.

Rowland.
(who's not letting on what it is that he's done because of all the
malicious creatures infesting this newsgroup who will attempt to use the
information against him.  It's an entirely sensible thing that I've
done, mind you - nothing remotely dodgy or out of order about it at
all.)

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> I have.
>
> I have just completed a task.
>

i wish i could get this dang kitchen clean.  :/

used2be  wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> > I have.
> >
> > I have just completed a task.
> 
> i wish i could get this dang kitchen clean.  :/ 

If all else fails, try napalm.

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> used2be  wrote:
>
>> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
>>> I have.
>>>
>>> I have just completed a task.
>>
>> i wish i could get this dang kitchen clean.  :/
>
> If all else fails, try napalm.

lol...it's a thought!

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> I have.
> 
> I have just completed a task.

Finally got round to washing your hair have you?

> 
> I should feel good about it, but I don't.  Never mind.  Keep at it.
> Getting something done is a lot better than my usual failure to get
> anything done.

Well maybe your failure to get anything done is due to the amount of 
freeloading time you spend spewing forth your wordiness into usenet?
Now try brushing your teeth.

> 
> Rowland.
> (who's not letting on what it is that he's done because of all the
> malicious creatures infesting this newsgroup who will attempt to use the
> information against him.  It's an entirely sensible thing that I've
> done, mind you - nothing remotely dodgy or out of order about it at
> all.)
> 

Well, I wouldn't describe Naughty Nigel as a "malicious creature". Being 
a ginger dosen't mean he is a bad person.
And as for "infesting this newsgroup" - that is said about you Rowland,
you infest.....

Hi Rowly,
I see that you are still the unemployable, over opinionated, talentless, 
paranoid, self-agrandising, non-contributing,  hypocritical layabout that 
you always were. A psychiatrist might say that your haughty wordiness 
betrays a deep inferiority complex based in the fact that, well, you really 
are inferior.
I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, looking 
for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit scrounger, 
Rowly.
Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded, 
inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a lot 
since then for me.
I like to pop back every few months to see how much further you have sunk, 
Rowly.
Remember Rowly, Great sinners often come cloaked in great sanctity - and 
thus it is with you mate.
I hold you and your pathetic alter-ego/sock puppet "Sarah" responsible for a 
lot of damage done to myself and others.
Anyway, got to fly now, see you in a couple of months .
Regards to all,
Prot@K-Pax

x-no-archive: yes

On Sep 30, 11:41 am, "Prot"  wrote:

> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, looking
> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit scrounger> Rowly.
> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,
> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a lot
> since then for me.

It's good that your life has turned around. Have you any suggestions
or advice for people who find themselves in the situation you were in?
What made the difference - was it medical help, friends, family or
something serendipitous like a lottery win?

Evil Nigel

PS I liked your film.

wrote in message 
news:64140bfa-db3e-48e0-b97c-244d462760e1@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
x-no-archive: yes

On Sep 30, 11:41 am, "Prot"  wrote:

> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
> looking
> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit scrounger,
> Rowly.
> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,
> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a 
> lot
> since then for me.

It's good that your life has turned around. Have you any suggestions
or advice for people who find themselves in the situation you were in?
What made the difference - was it medical help, friends, family or
something serendipitous like a lottery win?

Evil Nigel

PS I liked your film.

Hi (not so evil) Nigel,
In my case I think it was a combo of the right medication and a complete 
change of attitude within myself. Whereas once I worried about things and 
situations that I couldn't change, I now worry rarely about much at all. 
This sounds negative and selfish, I know - but it's about self preservation 
really and for me it works. Some ideas and beliefs that were important to me 
seem to have evaporated and left a residue of indifference, tinged with 
cynicsm.
At this point I should explain that I am not by nature a malicious person - 
It's just when I see Rowland spouting his rot, I tend to detonate.
Regards and peace to all,
Prot

"Prot"  wrote in message 
news:D5mdndA9katM1H_VnZ2dnUVZ8vudnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>  wrote in message 
> news:64140bfa-db3e-48e0-b97c-244d462760e1@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On Sep 30, 11:41 am, "Prot"  wrote:
>
>> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
>> looking
>> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit 
>> scrounger,
>> Rowly.
>> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially 
>> suceeded,
>> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed 
>> a lot
>> since then for me.
>
> It's good that your life has turned around. Have you any suggestions
> or advice for people who find themselves in the situation you were in?
> What made the difference - was it medical help, friends, family or
> something serendipitous like a lottery win?
>
> Evil Nigel
>
> PS I liked your film.
>
> Hi (not so evil) Nigel,
> In my case I think it was a combo of the right medication and a 
> complete change of attitude within myself. Whereas once I worried 
> about things and situations that I couldn't change, I now worry rarely 
> about much at all. This sounds negative and selfish, I know - but it's 
> about self preservation really and for me it works. Some ideas and 
> beliefs that were important to me seem to have evaporated and left a 
> residue of indifference, tinged with cynicsm.
> At this point I should explain that I am not by nature a malicious 
> person - It's just when I see Rowland spouting his rot, I tend to 
> detonate.
> Regards and peace to all,
> Prot

I fail to grasp why so many people are so disturbed by Rowland. I just 
don't get it. I see a man with problems like the rest of us, but I don't 
see the malice that others see. Am I blind and deaf?

If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple 
as that. You are your own worst enemy here.

CJ

x-no-archive: yes

On Sep 30, 6:01 pm, "CJ Dunnaway" 
wrote:

> If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple
> as that.

Newbies to the group are unaware of the personalities of the posters.
If they're down and need of support, how do they know who to trust?

> You are your own worst enemy here.

That doesn't seem to be the case - Prot is a success story, showing
that there can be life after depression. I'm not sure what he gains by
coming back and tormenting Rowland though.

Evil Nigel

> If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple 
> as that. You are your own worst enemy here.
> 
> CJ
>

Hi CJ,
Oh God, You're not a Proto-Rowly are you?
P.S.: What happened to Whiskers and Lord Benjamin?
Thanks,
Prot.

"indifference, tinged with cynicsm"

I like the sound of that.  Very healthy if you ask me :o)

[snip malice]

I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.

As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
own private amusement.

Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
dishonest malicious ravings to itself.

Rowland.

Prot  wrote:

> Hi Rowly,
> I see that you are still the unemployable, over opinionated, talentless,
> paranoid, self-agrandising, non-contributing,  hypocritical layabout that
> you always were. A psychiatrist might say that your haughty wordiness
> betrays a deep inferiority complex based in the fact that, well, you really
> are inferior.
> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, looking
> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit scrounger,
> Rowly.

Can anyone read this trash and not understand that in this poster, we do
indeed have a genuine troll of the most maliciously dishonest type?

Someone who has come here for no reason other than to cause dissension
amongst the genuine posters here, in the hope of driving them to despair
and suicide?

This creature is as vile as they get - and it's certain that it has no
mental health problems beyond a huge dose of malice and a psyche that
enjoys the pain of others.

> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,

No you didn't.  You are lying.

Purest fiction, nothing more - fiction posted here to get people to
sympathise with you and to hate me, for no reason other than your joy in
malice.

> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life.

Pure fantasty.

> Things have changed a lot 
> since then for me.

No, you're the same vile troll that you were back then.  Nothing has
changed for you, which is sad.  The same old pattern of lies and malice.

> I like to pop back every few months to see how much further you have sunk,
> Rowly.
> Remember Rowly, Great sinners often come cloaked in great sanctity - and
> thus it is with you mate.

And thus he admits his own evil - you come here, clocked in great
sanctity, and hurl your malicious false allegations around the place,
backed up with your lies about your imaginary mental health problems.

For sure you do have mental health problems - you're a very sick person,
because only a very sick person could come here and post the vile lies
that you post.

> I hold you and your pathetic alter-ego/sock puppet "Sarah"

I always post as myself, under my real name.  I have never adopted a
psuedonym on Usenet - unlike you, you malicious, cowardly toad.

Dare you post your real name?

You hide, you lie.

I am open and tell the truth.

> responsible for a 
> lot of damage done to myself and others.

What about the damage you and your kind do to the good people here, to
the genuinely ill people who need support?

What about the harm your malicious lies have caused?

I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.

As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
own private amusement.

Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
dishonest malicious ravings to itself.

Rowland.


-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

[snip malice]

I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.

As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
own private amusement.

Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
dishonest malicious ravings to itself.

Rowland.

wrote:

> "CJ Dunnaway" 
> wrote:
> 
> > If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple
> > as that.
> 
> Newbies to the group are unaware of the personalities of the posters.

Indeed, and having trolls coming here posting lies about the posters
doesn't really help with that, does it?

> If they're down and need of support, how do they know who to trust?

They don't.

The problem with posters like prot is that they lie about who to trust,
which makes things much worse.  He's lying from the outset, claiming to
have nearly committed suicide (as if!) and so on.

Prot and the creatures like it come here, spouting malicious lies, and
so make this newsgroup a worse place where the genuine posters snipe and
bicker amongst each other for the pleasure of scum like prot - who stand
back and watch and laugh at our pain.

In my life, I have learnt that anyone to approaches newbies (any time,
any place, not merely the 'net) and tells them who to trust and who not
to trust is - always - giving malicious advice.

It's a universal pattern, so it seems.  But it's also very common for
naive people to fall for that kind of advice.  I once did so myself,
when I was 18.  Once I fell for it - only once.

I learnt from my mistake, but others have not had my experiences and
might not know about this particular problem of malicious people in
society.

It's no surprise to me that we get the same behaviour on Usenet - it's
just harder to cope when the malicious liars won't even admit who they
are.

> > You are your own worst enemy here.
> 
> That doesn't seem to be the case - Prot is a success story, showing
> that there can be life after depression. 

Hardly!

Prot is a lying toad who's never had depression in his life, and still
suffers from a mental health problem which compells him to post
malicious lies in order to harm what is supposed to be a supportive
forum.

>I'm not sure what he gains by
> coming back and tormenting Rowland though.

<sigh>

What he gains is what all trolls gain - joy at the disruption he causes,
joy at making the world a worse place.  Joy at watching the nastiness he
sowed spread further.

Prot is here to take pleasure from the pain of others, that's all, just
like all trolls.  Prot remains very sick in the head and all he's trying
to do about it is make life more miserable for everyone else.

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

[snip malice]

I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.

As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
own private amusement.

Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
dishonest malicious ravings to itself.

Rowland.

CJ Dunnaway  wrote:

[snip]

> I fail to grasp why so many people are so disturbed by Rowland. 

Those who complain about me are not disturbed by me in the way that they
claim.  Their complaints are entirely fictitious.

But I do disturb the people who complain about me, just not in the ways
that they claim: they are all trolls, they are all malicious creatures
who have come here to cause dissention.

And I prod them in soft spots: my posts are designed to cause them
discomfort, in order to do one of two things: stop them attacking anyone
but me, to spare the weaker posters here; and hopefully to drive them
away eventually.

They come here to cause dissention because they find it funny to watch
the genuine posters here, the genuinely depressed, arguing, bickering,
shouting, and screaming at each other.  A bit like visiting Bedlam in
the bad old days, taking pleasure from the suffering of the inmates.

They're sickos, each and every one - but they don't belong here because
they are only interested in making life hell for other people, not
trying to get better.  Prot is lying about his experiences.

>I just 
> don't get it. I see a man with problems like the rest of us, but I don't
> see the malice that others see. Am I blind and deaf?

Of course not!  You're just a normal, decent bloke who's not entertained
by the suffering of others.

> If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple
> as that. You are your own worst enemy here.

Prot is the enemy of all of us here.  It's an ill creature all right -
ill, because only a sicko could take pleasure in causing pain to others,
as prot does.

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

wrote:

> "Prot"  wrote:
> 
> > I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, looking
> > for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit scrounger,
> > Rowly.
> > Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,
> > inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a lot
> > since then for me.
> 
> It's good that your life has turned around.

[snip]

Why make this post in response to someone who is an obvious malicious
troll, come here to make the enviroment of this newsgroup less
supportive by spreading malicious lies?

Why believe a word that Prot says?

An anonymous poster comes here and what does it do - it makes a post
which is nothing other than a vicious personal attack against me.

Surely most people in the world are bright enough to realise that anyone
like that is not to be trusted?

As for myself, I always post under my real name.  Does that not indicate
that I'm rather more honest than this prot creature?

Rowland.

-- 
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Hello Rowly, You old windbag.
Honestly mate, That last post of yours in this thread  had me in stitches. 
Judging by the way you reacted, I think I might have hit what is 
euphemistically called a "raw nerve" aka "The Truth", Right?
Just one word mate - Speculum...
Anyway, It was just great catching up with you again, we really must get 
together more often. gotta fly mate - catch you in a couple of months time!
Prot.

"Rowland McDonnell" <real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> wrote in message 
news:1io3lza.58uc937qtggyN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet...
> Prot  wrote:
>
>> Hi Rowly,
>> I see that you are still the unemployable, over opinionated, talentless,
>> paranoid, self-agrandising, non-contributing,  hypocritical layabout that
>> you always were. A psychiatrist might say that your haughty wordiness
>> betrays a deep inferiority complex based in the fact that, well, you 
>> really
>> are inferior.
>> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
>> looking
>> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit 
>> scrounger,
>> Rowly.
>
> Can anyone read this trash and not understand that in this poster, we do
> indeed have a genuine troll of the most maliciously dishonest type?
>
> Someone who has come here for no reason other than to cause dissension
> amongst the genuine posters here, in the hope of driving them to despair
> and suicide?
>
> This creature is as vile as they get - and it's certain that it has no
> mental health problems beyond a huge dose of malice and a psyche that
> enjoys the pain of others.
>
>> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,
>
> No you didn't.  You are lying.
>
> Purest fiction, nothing more - fiction posted here to get people to
> sympathise with you and to hate me, for no reason other than your joy in
> malice.
>
>> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life.
>
> Pure fantasty.
>
>> Things have changed a lot
>> since then for me.
>
> No, you're the same vile troll that you were back then.  Nothing has
> changed for you, which is sad.  The same old pattern of lies and malice.
>
>> I like to pop back every few months to see how much further you have 
>> sunk,
>> Rowly.
>> Remember Rowly, Great sinners often come cloaked in great sanctity - and
>> thus it is with you mate.
>
> And thus he admits his own evil - you come here, clocked in great
> sanctity, and hurl your malicious false allegations around the place,
> backed up with your lies about your imaginary mental health problems.
>
> For sure you do have mental health problems - you're a very sick person,
> because only a very sick person could come here and post the vile lies
> that you post.
>
>> I hold you and your pathetic alter-ego/sock puppet "Sarah"
>
> I always post as myself, under my real name.  I have never adopted a
> psuedonym on Usenet - unlike you, you malicious, cowardly toad.
>
> Dare you post your real name?
>
> You hide, you lie.
>
> I am open and tell the truth.
>
>> responsible for a
>> lot of damage done to myself and others.
>
> What about the damage you and your kind do to the good people here, to
> the genuinely ill people who need support?
>
> What about the harm your malicious lies have caused?
>
> I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.
>
> As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
> here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
> dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
> own private amusement.
>
> Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
> dishonest malicious ravings to itself.
>
> Rowland.
>
>
> -- 
> Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
>                                            Sorry - the spam got to me
> http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
> UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:01:38 -0500, CJ Dunnaway wrote:

> "Prot"  wrote in message 
> news:D5mdndA9katM1H_VnZ2dnUVZ8vudnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>>  wrote in message 
>> news:64140bfa-db3e-48e0-b97c-244d462760e1@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> On Sep 30, 11:41 am, "Prot"  wrote:
>>
>>> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
>>> looking
>>> for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit 
>>> scrounger,
>>> Rowly.
>>> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially 
>>> suceeded,
>>> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed 
>>> a lot
>>> since then for me.
>>
>> It's good that your life has turned around. Have you any suggestions
>> or advice for people who find themselves in the situation you were in?
>> What made the difference - was it medical help, friends, family or
>> something serendipitous like a lottery win?
>>
>> Evil Nigel
>>
>> PS I liked your film.
>>
>> Hi (not so evil) Nigel,
>> In my case I think it was a combo of the right medication and a 
>> complete change of attitude within myself. Whereas once I worried 
>> about things and situations that I couldn't change, I now worry rarely 
>> about much at all. This sounds negative and selfish, I know - but it's 
>> about self preservation really and for me it works. Some ideas and 
>> beliefs that were important to me seem to have evaporated and left a 
>> residue of indifference, tinged with cynicsm.
>> At this point I should explain that I am not by nature a malicious 
>> person - It's just when I see Rowland spouting his rot, I tend to 
>> detonate.
>> Regards and peace to all,
>> Prot
> 
> I fail to grasp why so many people are so disturbed by Rowland. I just 
> don't get it. I see a man with problems like the rest of us, but I don't 
> see the malice that others see. Am I blind and deaf?

Yes, and yes.

> 
> If Rowland bothers you so much then don't respond to him. It's as simple 
> as that. You are your own worst enemy here.
> 
> CJ

Don't you wonder why Rowlie keeps posting here while complaining about
trolls? Why doesn't he ignore them, if such people exist? I haven't seen
any trolls here other than Rowlie himself.


-- 
"Burn the witch?  No, burn the Roman pope, that's the ticket."
Rowland McDonnell - Hates the Pope - Sept. 16, 2008

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:09:01 +0100, Rowland McDonnell wrote:

> Prot is here to take pleasure from the pain of others, that's all, just
> like all trolls.  Prot remains very sick in the head and all he's trying
> to do about it is make life more miserable for everyone else.

How supportive of you, Rowlie. That sounds like what you said about your
mate Sarah.


-- 
"<shrug>  The poor lass is very ill in the head - she knows it."
Rowland McDonnell - Sarah Balfour Ill in the Head - 12Apr08

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:18:36 +0100, Rowland McDonnell wrote:

> And I prod them in soft spots: my posts are designed to cause them
> discomfort, in order to do one of two things: stop them attacking anyone
> but me, to spare the weaker posters here; and hopefully to drive them
> away eventually.

I thought I felt you prodding one of my soft spots, but it turned out to be
a fart.

-- 
"The rage, anger, hatred, and bitterness I feel is impossible to describe
except to say that it's made me want to kill the lot of them."
Rowland McDonnell - violent fantasies - Jan 18, 2008

Prot wrote:
> Hi Rowly,
> I see that you are still the unemployable, over opinionated, talentless, 
> paranoid, self-agrandising, non-contributing,  hypocritical layabout 
> that you always were. A psychiatrist might say that your haughty 
> wordiness betrays a deep inferiority complex based in the fact that, 
> well, you really are inferior.
> I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
> looking for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit 
> scrounger, Rowly.
> Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded, 
> inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a 
> lot since then for me.
> I like to pop back every few months to see how much further you have 
> sunk, Rowly.
> Remember Rowly, Great sinners often come cloaked in great sanctity - and 
> thus it is with you mate.
> I hold you and your pathetic alter-ego/sock puppet "Sarah" responsible 
> for a lot of damage done to myself and others.
> Anyway, got to fly now, see you in a couple of months .
> Regards to all,
> Prot@K-Pax

Hi
Rowland and Sarah are not one and the same, they are very distinctivelee 
different poasters. Sarah still lurks here though.
I've just had a very breef look in the archives, what nym did you 
originally poast with?

Rowland McDonnell wrote:

> 
> Indeed, and having trolls coming here posting lies about the posters
> doesn't really help with that, does it?
> 

What lies, you have the right of reply to anything poasted, so what are 
you disputing to be an untruth?
Here is your chance to correct some "lies" you claim are being made, 
just a couple to start with:
You have boasted of your criminal activity as a motorcyclist, that you 
have deliberately and regularly exceeded the speed limit. You have 
poasted how you distress your wife Rebecca when she has been pillion by 
speeding and not keeping your eye on the road, turning your head to talk 
to her etc, that is criminal activity, it is stupidly irresponsible and 
it is cunts such as yourself who not only put your own worthless life at 
risk, but those of innocent and law abiding road users.
Those boasts of yours are archived, but you have trolled that they are 
lies, so clarify it now.

Over the years you have made hundreds of poasts concerning your contempt 
for the NHS and GP's etc, you have poasted that you are not registered 
with a GP as none will now have you on their books, you have also 
poasted your main gripe is because they can't find anything wrong with 
you. You have many times claimed to be an Asperger sufferer, but it is 
archived in your own poasts, that it is your own self-diagnosis.
You have never been diagnosed with any such medical condition.

Now is your chance, if you are saying that I am a liar then you'll be 
confident that you can poast your rebuttal and that I won't be able to 
produce any proof. So in the above two examples, are they "lies"?


And once we have that clarified, then we may go onto your years of 
control freek bullying and pomposity within a couple of usenet froops.

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> I have.
> 
> I have just completed a task.
> 
> I should feel good about it, but I don't.  Never mind.  Keep at it.
> Getting something done is a lot better than my usual failure to get
> anything done.
> 
> Rowland.
> (who's not letting on what it is that he's done because of all the
> malicious creatures infesting this newsgroup who will attempt to use the
> information against him.  It's an entirely sensible thing that I've
> done, mind you - nothing remotely dodgy or out of order about it at
> all.)
> 

hi scaredy-cat, how's the doormat?

On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:35:27 +0100, Pub L wrote:

> What lies, you have the right of reply to anything poasted, so what are 
> you disputing to be an untruth?

He has nothing to say, PL. You have him dead to rights, as usual. He
doesn't dare to cross swords with an intellect like yours.

In article 
<1io273h.1syqdzgih9xjsN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
 real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> I have.
> 
> I have just completed a task.

Well done, I bet you feel much better after a wash :-)
> 
> I should feel good about it, but I don't.  Never mind.  Keep at it.
> Getting something done is a lot better than my usual failure to get
> anything done.

Put your computers in the bin, you will be able to get on with life :-)
> 
> Rowland.
> (who's not letting on what it is that he's done because of all the
> malicious creatures infesting this newsgroup who will attempt to use the
> information against him.  It's an entirely sensible thing that I've
> done, mind you - nothing remotely dodgy or out of order about it at
> all.)

Was it this :-)

<http://student.bmj.com/issues/03/06/life/images/life13.jpg>

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

In article 
<1io3n7g.1pyzp8b11s1j46N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
 real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

>  wrote:
> 
> > "Prot"  wrote:
> > 
> > > I came to this list a couple of years ago when I was very, very low, 
> > > looking
> > > for help, only to be branded a troll by the illustrious benefit 
> > > scrounger,
> > > Rowly.
> > > Shortly thereafter, I went on to attempt suicide and partially suceeded,
> > > inasmuch as the hospital brought me back to life. Things have changed a 
> > > lot
> > > since then for me.
> > 
> > It's good that your life has turned around.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Why make this post in response to someone who is an obvious malicious
> troll, come here to make the enviroment of this newsgroup less
> supportive by spreading malicious lies?

I can't see any lies, which lies are you talking about?
> 
> Why believe a word that Prot says?

When you look back 21 months to your orginal attack it fits in with what 
he says, you are well known for telling porkies then denying all 
knowledge :-)
> 
> An anonymous poster comes here and what does it do - it makes a post
> which is nothing other than a vicious personal attack against me.

One that is quite warranted :-)
> 
> Surely most people in the world are bright enough to realise that anyone
> like that is not to be trusted?

No, most people can't be arsed to even think about it, they realise it 
is quite plausible that you did do as prot says, if they could be 
bothered to look back it will look even more plausible that Prot is 
telling the truth and that you are lying yet again :-)
> 
> As for myself, I always post under my real name.  Does that not indicate
> that I'm rather more honest than this prot creature?

Well, to be honest, no it doesn't, you did accuse him of being a troll 
21 months ago.
> 
> Rowland.

Where are you, Rowland, are you crashing and burning :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

[snip malice]

I reckon it's best for all to ignore the ravings of this malicious toad.

As far as I can tell, it's got nothing but ill-will towards all who post
here, and seems motivated purely by a desire to spread hatred and
dissention, causing posters here to bicker amongst each other for its
own private amusement.

Assuming I'm right, the world would be a better place if it kept its
dishonest malicious ravings to itself.

Rowland.

In article 
<1io74lu.nwvavj1hz9as6N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
  rowland.mcdonnell@physics.org (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> [snip malice]

So you prefer to bluster your way through the evidence against you :-) 
Nothing new there, then :-)

You are indeed a fraud, get yourself a job you malingering , unhygienic 
cunt :-)

-- 
"These faults you see are not *MY* faults - they are your faults,reflected back
at you." Rowland McDonnell. June 2007: "What you need to consider is that I am
in fact mad."Rowland McDonnell - 16 Dec. 2007: "If I think I've been insulted,
then I have been insulted" Rowland McDonnell - 13 Apr. 2008

On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:52:32 +0100, John DoH blathered:

> In article 
> <1io74lu.nwvavj1hz9as6N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet>,
>   rowland.mcdonnell@physics.org (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:
> 
>> [snip malice]
> 
> So you prefer to bluster your way through the evidence against you :-) 
> Nothing new there, then :-)
> 
> You are indeed a fraud, get yourself a job you malingering , unhygienic 
> cunt :-)

Oh please! What do you have against cunts?

-- 
"I've met a lot more objectionable white English people than any other
sort of person I can think of."
Rowland McDonnell - Dissing the English - 05May08