Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
people
adoption.misc
adoption.searching
bdsm
bodyart
consumers
consumers.ebay
crossdressing
dead
deaf
disability
disability.bikers
ex-forces
fathers
gothic
health
parents
parents.pregnancy
polyamorous
sf-fans
silversurfers
support.arthritis
support.cfs-me
support.depression
support.epilepsy
support.mental-health
support.mult-sclerosis
teens
  
 
date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:37:19 GMT,    group: uk.people.sf-fans        back       
Re: M.I,5.Persecuti on ` th eir metho ds and tactic s   
is. Let us estimate
these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. "That is very fine. Yes, I must
wager; but I may perhaps wager too much." Let us see. Since there is an
equal risk of gain and of loss, if you had only to gain two lives, instead
of one, you might still wager. But if there were three lives to gain, you
would have to play (since you are under the necessity of playing), and you
would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to
gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain. But
there is an eternity of life and happiness. And this being so, if there were
an infinity of chances, of which one only would be for you, you would still
be right in wagering one to win two, and you would act stupidly, being
obliged to play, by refusing to stake one life against three at a game in
which out of an infinity of chances there is one for you, if there were an
infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain. But there is here an
date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:37:19 GMT   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us