The Truth About Vaccine as a Life-Saving "Medicine"

Infectious disease mortality declined dramatically prior to
availability of most vaccine (See "Public Health at the Crossroads,"
by R. Beaglehole and R. Bonita, pg 43) such that only 3.5%, at most,
of the decline in disease-related mortality from 1900 to 1975 could be
attributed to measures introduced for the control of these diseases.
In other words, vaccine may have accounted for only 1% of these
mortality declines, or none at all, we do not know.  And without
assessment of the risk of adverse reactions that might show vaccines
to be responsible for an overall reduction in life years, this
"intervention" violates the Precautionary Principle, as well.  The
Precautionary Principle states that the burden of proof for a medical
intervention must rest with its proponents.  It is critical to
understand that rates of infection, unlike measles mortality, were
never reliably assessed and were, in fact, dramatically under
reported. According to Alfred S. Evans and Richard A. Kaslow in their
book, "Viral Infections of Humans," incidence of measles were under-
reported by at least a factor of ten.  So say the authors: "...prior
to introduction of measles vaccine, about 400,000 cases of measles
were reported in the United States every year, but 4 million children
were born and essentially all of them ultimately developed measles
antibody that could only have been acquired as the result of
infection.  Thus, the mean true number of cases per year was about 4
million."  So the infection rate was ten times higher than is commonly
reported, meaning the true mortality rate prior to vaccine was just
one tenth what is claimed by the drug makers.  So measles is not the
1:500 fatality risk claimed by pro-vaccine agents of industry, whose
promotion of vaccine rests mostly on theoretical science in the form
of antibody titres, community surveys, and historical fallacies.  Any
discussion of the fatality risk of measles based on faulty data
supplied by vaccine makers, in the absence of meaningful safety data,
is an assault on public health.