I was researching my posting history using Google's Usenet interface
and saw that the platform has reduced access to many of my oldest
posts.  At any rate, here is a link to the first thread with a post of
mine to someone named Jason regarding his interaction with Mark
Probert.  Please note Mark's response to Jason.  Do you think this is
someone who achieved an objective?

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_frm/thread/2d0646938f7215c4/658baf54ea9350ae?hl=en&q=

Also see the "Warning" post, at
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/f569f86c8ed22f4e

On Oct 14, 11:19 am, PeterB  wrote:

I forgot to add that it is Mark's "farewell" post to Jason that I am
referring to, his second in that thread.  Consistent with the
"Warning" post, the objective of reducing participation in the
newsgroup was accomplished.   There will never be an effort by
pharmnuts to expand readership in the ng.  Note they are now trying to
redirect activity to a Yahoo venue.

PeterB  wrote:

>Note they are now trying to
>redirect activity to a Yahoo venue.

I assume you are talking about me here.

I was asked to write some articles for Yahoo!. The one on vaccination
was the fifth one. The others have been an introduction to skepticism,
and thoughts about homeopathy, 911 "truthers" and atheism. The next
two will probably be about Holocaust denial and creationism. Do you
think my Big Pharma "sponsors" are getting their money's worth?

http://au.news.yahoo.com/opinion/archive/-/blog/australianskeptics

And are you still too frightened of Yahoo! to go there and contribute?

-- 
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:19:10 -0700 (PDT), PeterB  wrote:

>I was researching 

Really?

Better read this:

</quote>
Botenstoffe: Wichtige Rolle beim Leberzellkrebs   
--------------------------------------------------

Hepatitis-Viren verursachen chronische Leberentzündung und können zu
Leberzellkrebs führen. Man nimmt an, dass die veränderte Ausprägung von
Botenstoffen an der entzündungsvermittelten Leberkrebsentstehung entscheidend
beteiligt ist.
</quote>

more:

http://news.doccheck.com/de/article/180162-botenstoffe-wichtige-rolle-beim-leberzellkrebs/


Quintessence: Vaccination against hepatitis is also a prevention against cancer.

.
-- 
**** WARNING **** The web-hoster Globat.com steals money from your
credit card account. If you are a customer of Globat.com, never give 
them any credit card information. If you can't erase the information,
then do delete the old card and get a new one!      **** WARNING ****

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:26:49 -0700 (PDT), PeterB  wrote:

>On Oct 14, 11:19 am, PeterB  wrote:
>
>I forgot to add 


Forgot? Really? Better read this:

</quote>
Botenstoffe: Wichtige Rolle beim Leberzellkrebs   
--------------------------------------------------

Hepatitis-Viren verursachen chronische Leberentzündung und können zu
Leberzellkrebs führen. Man nimmt an, dass die veränderte Ausprägung von
Botenstoffen an der entzündungsvermittelten Leberkrebsentstehung entscheidend
beteiligt ist.
</quote>

more:

http://news.doccheck.com/de/article/180162-botenstoffe-wichtige-rolle-beim-leberzellkrebs/


Quintessence: Vaccination against hepatitis is also a prevention against cancer.

.
-- 
**** WARNING **** The web-hoster Globat.com steals money from your
credit card account. If you are a customer of Globat.com, never give 
them any credit card information. If you can't erase the information,
then do delete the old card and get a new one!      **** WARNING ****

On Oct 14, 7:01 pm, Peter Bowditch  wrote:
> PeterB  wrote:
> >Note they are now trying to
> >redirect activity to a Yahoo venue.
>
> I assume you are talking about me here.
>
> I was asked to write some articles for Yahoo!. The one on vaccination
> was the fifth one. The others have been an introduction to skepticism,
> and thoughts about homeopathy, 911 "truthers" and atheism. The next
> two will probably be about Holocaust denial and creationism. Do you
> think my Big Pharma "sponsors" are getting their money's worth?
>
> http://au.news.yahoo.com/opinion/archive/-/blog/australianskeptics
>
> And are you still too frightened of Yahoo! to go there and contribute?

Pontificating Blowhard is afraid that he may read something that will
make him think.

On Oct 14, 7:01 pm, Peter Bowditch  wrote:
> PeterB  wrote:
> >Note they are now trying to
> >redirect activity to a Yahoo venue.
>
> I assume you are talking about me here.
>
> I was asked to write some articles for Yahoo!. The one on vaccination
> was the fifth one. The others have been an introduction to skepticism,
> and thoughts about homeopathy, 911 "truthers" and atheism. The next
> two will probably be about Holocaust denial and creationism. Do you
> think my Big Pharma "sponsors" are getting their money's worth?

I'm sure they want you to be a more well rounded pharmnut.

> http://au.news.yahoo.com/opinion/archive/-/blog/australianskeptics
>
> And are you still too frightened of Yahoo! to go there and contribute?

No, I just like getting invited over and over again.

On Oct 14, 9:03 pm, Mark Probert  wrote:
> On Oct 14, 7:01 pm, Peter Bowditch  wrote:
>
> > PeterB  wrote:
> > >Note they are now trying to
> > >redirect activity to a Yahoo venue.
>
> > I assume you are talking about me here.
>
> > I was asked to write some articles for Yahoo!. The one on vaccination
> > was the fifth one. The others have been an introduction to skepticism,
> > and thoughts about homeopathy, 911 "truthers" and atheism. The next
> > two will probably be about Holocaust denial and creationism. Do you
> > think my Big Pharma "sponsors" are getting their money's worth?
>
> >http://au.news.yahoo.com/opinion/archive/-/blog/australianskeptics
>
> > And are you still too frightened of Yahoo! to go there and contribute?
>
> Pontificating Blowhard is afraid that he may read something that
> will make him think.

No, I'm afraid I'll encounter more incarnations of people like you who
clearly don't read anything at all.  If I'm wrong, provide a list of
book titles on medical science that have informed your opinions.  Oh
that's right, you just keep ignoring that question.  My bad.

On Oct 14, 1:14 pm, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
 wrote:
> On Oct 14, 8:19 am, PeterB  wrote:
>
> > I was researching my posting history using Google's Usenet interface
> > and saw that the platform has reduced access to many of my oldest
> > posts.  At any rate, here is a link to the first thread with a post of
> > mine to someone named Jason regarding his interaction with Mark
> > Probert.  Please note Mark's response to Jason.  Do you think this is
> > someone who achieved an objective?
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_frm/thr...
>
> > Also see the "Warning" post, athttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/f569f86c8ed22f4e
>
> The loss of 5 pints of blood and no mention of
> an auto crash. Sounds like an NSAID induced
> GI bleed.

Try a detatched intestinal polyp causing a bleed form an artery.

And we can be fairly sure he
> wasn't taking a vitamin K supplement.
>
> Jason could have been a strawman.
> If Jason was worried about a swear word
> or two, he needed to get out in larger
> world for awhile anyway.
>
> I tried the Yahoo groups in the past. Some were good
> and others had monitors/censors/group owners with
> rather closed minds. Yahoo deleted some of
> the groups due to fear of the "moral majority"
> types. Which indicates a problem with a single
> company providing interchange, it is too easy
> to slip into censorship.
>
> Trig