UK - HPV Gardasil Circus Of Death Rolled Out
The British State Media Whore Big Pharma Nexus

By Philip Jones
Oct-3-2008

On the front page of MSN UK this morning is the below article. Please note 
the happy faces of the three pretty young girls. I'll wager my house that 
following the three shot Gardasil vaccine programme being advocated to 
inoculate against this `killer` virus, they won't be smiling so heartily. 
This MSN article is typical of the mainstream media's whorish slavery to the 
State/Pharma Nexus. There is barely a word of truth contained in it's shoddy 
and poorly researched text, and yet the same rubbish or similar will be 
reproduced indiscriminately throughout the UK media, and believed without 
question by the vast majority who read it. Together with what can only be 
called a `Mass Marketing Campaign` for Gardasil and Merck, the Corporate 
Beast which produces it, it is difficult to see how one can even make a 
`dent` in the number of innocent young girls, whose lives will be forever 
affected by their parents decision to accept the Governments propaganda, and 
allow their daughters to receive the course of `jabs`.

The nature of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) and Gardasil has been expertly 
covered on this site previously by Dr Tim O'Shea (HPV The First Cancer 
Vaccine 10-6-7) and should be read in conjunction with this article. What I 
want to try and illustrate here is the stranglehold that the modern 
Corporate State has on it's people, and how completely `plugged in` to it's 
`Matrix` those people are. So `plugged in` to the point where many parents 
in the UK for example have totally abdicated responsibility for their 
children. Handing them over `lock stock and barrel` to the State machine.

Before we proceed, this is what MSN has to say about HPV and the government 
programme associated with it:

pa.press.net - 03.09.2008 09:01

  Cervical cancer jab roll-out starts

  "The Government is set to officially roll out its campaign to vaccinate 
young girls against a virus that causes cervical cancer.
  Social networking sites have already been targeted in a bid to encourage 
girls to have the jab which helps protect against human Papillomavirus 
(HPV).
  HPV is a sexually-transmitted infection that causes most cases of cervical 
cancer.
  Schools across the UK will start vaccinating pupils aged 12 and 13 (Year 
8) from this week onwards, with about 300,000 girls receiving the jab in 
England alone.
  By July 2011, more than two million girls will have been offered the 
vaccine, including those up to the age of 18 as part of a catch-up 
programme.
  The Government's campaign for England, which is launched later, includes 
online, press, TV and radio advertising.
  A series of `road shows` will also be held in shopping centres across the 
country.
  The Government's main campaign will run this month and next, with some 
follow-up advertising in February to remind girls not to miss their third 
and final injection.
  Girls aged 17 and 18, who form part of the catch-up programme, will be the 
target of a different advertising campaign in October.
  The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause 
cervical cancer, which accounts for around 1,000 deaths a year in the UK".

What I will now do is debunk this piece of `hokum`, quoting real experts in 
the field who are in no doubt whatsoever about what the true purpose of this 
pernicious campaign is all about.

The Lie : HPV is a sexually transmitted disease that causes most cases of 
Cervical Cancer. The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains 
that cause Cervical Cancer.

There are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are theoretically linked 
to Cervical Cancer. HPV is present naturally in at least half the population 
without ever causing any disease whatsoever. HPV has never been proved as a 
pathogen for any disease. Merck, the marketers of HPV are making the 
ludicrous claim that the virus just happened along and attacked some healthy 
cells causing them to mutate and begin replicating out of control, and that 
is now happening on a mass scale, even though it has only recently been 
discovered, and that a vaccine can somehow neutralise that attack on normal 
cervix cells. We are in the realms here of `Junk Science`.

Merck the said Pharmaceutical Industry giant originally claimed that " There 
was a strong connection between HPV and cervical cancer" . Somewhere along 
the way, that became "is the cause of" without any medical evidence to 
support this claim. This is clearly more about sales and marketing than 
science. The vaccine itself `Gardasil` has no competition in the field and 
consists of `virus like ` particles from four strains of HPV. With no 
clinical studies whatsoever, two of these `strains` are now being touted by 
Merck as being responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases, as so 
erroneously quoted in the above MSN text. The insert for Gardasil makes the 
unproven claim, " HPV cause squamus cell, cervical cancer".

The market demographic Merck chose was pre teen 12 year old girls. But wait 
a minute, the average age of women who contract cervical cancer is 50 years, 
so why target 12 year olds. And even Merck themselves openly state that the 
efficacy of the vaccine is only 5 years, making it worthless by the time the 
subject needs the immunity, I.e. around her fiftieth birthday. Any claimed 
protection will have worn off long ago.. An established risk factor with 
cervical cancer is the number of sexual partners a woman has had. So who do 
you imagine will have had more, a 12 year old or a 50 year old. There is 
something seriously amiss with anyone who selects the former. So why are 
they so intent of giving it to 12 year olds, rather than what would be the 
correct target age if the vaccine did have any protective vale, namely women 
in their forties? Merck say it's because the vaccine hasn't been `safety 
proved` for women above 26 years of age. So as Dr O'Shea sardonically puts 
it `better give it to young girls then`.

The number of vicious and painful side affects to this vaccine programme are 
little short of frightening, and include fever, nausea, pharyngitus, 
dizziness, gastroenteritis, appendicitis, bronco spasm and many more. In 
other words, real side effects in exchange for unproven immunity (Please see 
the Google Videos on the link provided below).

There is even a strong probability that this under tested and unproven drug 
might be carcogenic in it's own right. We are dealing here with a vaccine 
which claims to prevent cancer by imitating a pathogen which causes cancer. 
Merck say about this,
"Gardasil has not been evaluated for carcogenicity or impairment to 
fertility".

The Reasons For The Lie :

It is in the above statement that I believe the true motives behind this 
programme lie. To cause sterility and or cancer in young females thereby 
enabling a massive advance in the Illuminati's depopulation agenda. It can 
be the only logical reason as to why governments in the service of the 
`hidden masters` would either encourage, coerce or mandate such an 
unsubstantiated vaccination regime and apply it to 12 year old girls when 
the risk group are women in their fifties, who for the most part are well 
past the age of conception. Furthermore, the Pharmaceuticals will once again 
make a fortune off the back of human suffering.

What is so worrying is that with all the mainstream avenues of information 
secured, and with the huge financial recourses of `Big Pharma` to drive it 
along, and the seemingly limitless ability of the mass of the population to 
just comply, comply, comply, it is difficult to how this exercise in evil 
can be thwarted.

Ref: Dr Tim O'Shea : HPV The First Cancer Vaccine www.rense.com 10.6.7
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gardasil&emb=0#
http://www.heising.dk  `Pharmageddon The Global War Against Women` by Kjeld 
Heising.


" The Matrix is a system, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside 
it, you look around and what do you see? Businessmen, Teachers, Lawyers, 
Carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we 
do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. 
You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be 
`unplugged`. And many are so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they 
will fight to defend it ".

Why I won't let my girls have these cancer jabs
12:59pm Friday 3rd October 2008

As thousands of young girls across Sussex undergo a series of jabs to 
protect them against cervical cancer, one mother has urged parents to 
educate themselves about the risks involved.

Reporter Samuel Underwood talks to her about why she is concerned about the 
vaccine and why her daughters will not been immunised.

Jacqui Andrews is like any other mother - doting on her children, devoting 
much of her life to their welfare and putting their safety and health first.

But unlike most parents, she has taken the bold step of refusing to have her 
eldest daughter Jasmine immunised against the human papilloma virus (HPV).

Cervarix vaccine is made by GlaxoSmithKline, which has a factory in Crawley.

The vaccine is being given to girls aged 11 and 12 across the country in a 
Government bid to protect against the virus which can cause cervical cancer.

But Mrs Andrews, 39, from Hove, claimed it had not been properly tested, was 
not proven to work and could lead to further health problems.

She said: "When the immunisation campaign started about six months ago I 
thought I would look on the internet to find out a bit more about the 
vaccine and what was involved.

"I was shocked to find details of the side-effects and possible health 
impacts of it and also to see that there was no proof that it would actually 
protect girls from cervical cancer."

As she delved deeper into the issue, Mrs Andrews found that a similar 
vaccine, Gardasil, had been given to girls in America and that numerous law 
suits had been filed by parents whose daughters had adverse reactions to the 
vaccine.

Twenty girls died within a few days of receiving Gardasil, which has a 
similar make-up to Cervarix, although the deaths were dismissed as 
coincidence by the manufacturer, Merck.

Side-effects of both vaccines listed by their manufacturers include 
fainting, dizziness and sore arms.

She said: "In America it's mandatory that girls are immunised and some are 
told they cannot go to school unless they have been.

"I'm concerned. The girls are too young. They are not sexually active yet 
and their bodies are still developing.

"You can have the vaccine up to the age of 55, so why not wait until they 
are old enough to make the decision for themselves?

"It is a dead virus that they are being injected with but Cervarix has got 
aluminium in it, which is a heavy metal that can cause joint problems and 
auto-immune responses."

She added: "It is so controversial. I just want parents to be informed. They 
need to find out what exactly is being injected into their children before 
they have it done so that they can make an informed choice."

Mrs Andrews said she made that choice early on in her eldest daughter's life 
and after having her immunised against polio, decided to go no further.

She said her GP tried to convince her that immunisation was the right path 
but she stuck to her guns and has raised Jasmine, and her younger sister 
Isobella, four, without vaccines.

She said: "I think it's irresponsible of the Government to push this vaccine 
forward when it has not been properly tested yet and may do more harm than 
good. It's scaremongering in order to make a profit for the drug companies 
and should not be allowed.

"I think the Government should do more to encourage screening for cervical 
cancer and promote smear tests to get more women to have them regularly 
rather than injecting every girl with a vaccine that might not be safe."

Mrs Andrews said she was aware of several natural remedies that were 
available to protect against the HPV virus, including Amazonian bark 
lapacho, also known as paud'arco.

She said: "All I want is for parents to make an informed decision about 
their daughters' health and not to follow the Government's plans like sheep.

"As long as they know the risks and are aware of what could happen before 
they go ahead with it then they will be able to make the choice that is 
right for them."

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/commentandanalysis/3726309.Why_I_won_t_let_my_girls_have_these_cancer_jabs/?action=complain&cid=6875167

On Oct 8, 11:51 am, "JOHN"  wrote:
> Why I won't let my girls have these cancer jabs

It is information like this that makes me wonder about the future.

Actions like this by an informed parent, a parent informed via the
internet, is nice to see.  However, this is exactly why the gubment
and big pharma want to do away with a free internet.  Their
indoctrination and brainwashing can fail to sway an alert and
intelligent citizen.

Keep the peace but be willing to fight for liberty.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.

On Oct 8, 8:34 pm, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
> On Oct 8, 11:51 am, "JOHN"  wrote:
>
> > Why I won't let my girls have these cancer jabs
>
> It is information like this that makes me wonder about the future.
>
> Actions like this by an informed parent,

She must have gotten her information on Mars.

a parent informed via the
> internet, is nice to see.

She isutterly clueless.

> However, this is exactly why the gubment
> and big pharma want to do away with a free internet.  Their
> indoctrination and brainwashing can fail to sway an alert and
> intelligent citizen.

You do not have to worry about brainwashing. You have nothing to
wash.