On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:07:13 +0000, x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com wrote:

>I'm finding all this really disappointing.
>
>I've only just come to grips with the idea that I'm now disabled and I
>subscribed to this group in the hope that I might find information and
>support here.

All people either disabled or able bodied are still human with their
differences opinions and frailties.

I was simply passing on information. Information that was a fact for
me. 
My Sony and BMW units wont work with other CD player units, FACT.
They wouldn't work with adaptor units FACT. I manage by rejigging the
wiring to get the BMW to barely communicate with the CD player unit by
actually telling the CD motor unit to spin but that was all. 
The Sony problem was solved, I sold it on Ebay and bought a CD/DVD/TV
all in one unit which is great as I can watch TV while the wife is in
the supermarket.
For the BMW I used a tape adaptor and an iPod to play my music.

I wasn't stating that a Halfords adapter unit wont work for you. What
I was doing was passing on Empirical evidence that they don't always
work for everyones units, despite some rubbish that people spout.
Good Luck

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:37 +0000, Custard <ignore the
facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

You may be able to ignore the facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk, but you
can't ignore them in this newsgroup.

Lavabread responded with a useful link for the OP of this thread.

You, on the other hand you have responded with:

"AHHHH right So you still refuse to explain why the equipment I use
wont communicate? Its soooo easy to ignore the facts isnt it.? BTW You
dont work for the national health Service do you? They seem to
ignore a lot of facts like you do.....Plonker"

"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and in your case its
true"

"I wasn't stating that a Halfords adapter unit wont work for you. What
I was doing was passing on Empirical evidence that they don't always
work for everyones units, despite some rubbish that people spout."

"My my Mr smug eh? the man who knows everything about everyone.
Unfortunatley who know nothing about the units I have or what I tried.
Must be heaven in your ignorance."

" but I received an email from someone yesterday who
didn't want to get attacked by a certain rabid 'Know-all' "

Now I know the last one was a lie, because there cannot be another
person on this planet that thinks Lavabread has been anything more
than helpful. Anyone can compare both your posts to this group and
clearly see who is the "rabid" one.

As for your other remarks, you need to up your medication immediately.
Please accept that in the manner in which it was intended.

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:03:31 +0000, judith  wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:37 +0000, Custard <ignore the
>facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>As for your other remarks, you need to up your medication immediately.
>Please accept that in the manner in which it was intended.

Oh dear, another one short of the grey stuff and unable to read
completey what was written

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:18:16 +0000, Custard <ignore the
facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:03:31 +0000, judith  wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:37 +0000, Custard <ignore the
>>facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>As for your other remarks, you need to up your medication immediately.
>>Please accept that in the manner in which it was intended.
>
>Oh dear, another one short of the grey stuff and unable to read
>completey what was written

Why not make it clear to me? Because as far as I can tell, you are
reading a completely different thread to me.

Come on, show me where Lavabread offered to explain why your gear
doesnt work, or just how you expected him/her todo so without seeing
your setup?

Why is he/she a "Know All", when he/she has only provided a link to a
website where you may be able to find an answer to your problem?

Why is he/she "Rabid", when clearly your track record in this group
and in this thread is positively shite?

What facts has Lavabread ignored?

Why is h/she smug or ignorant? He/she hasn't rubbed your nose in it
like many would after your rants, and he/she is obviously ignorant of
your setup as are we all, but he/she  has never suggested that he
knows anything about your setup. Just pointed you to somewhere where
you might find an answer.

Oh, and while youre at it, tell us why you were thick enough to fall
for the patter from Sony and BMW when that's all they want is for you
to buy  another unit (which you did of course). Lol!

And one last one. Are you still "supported in email"
Cowardly.......urrm, Custard?

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:13:51 +0000, judith  wrote:

Usual self flattering shite removed

>Oh, and while youre at it, tell us why you were thick enough to fall
>for the patter from Sony and BMW when that's all they want is for you
>to buy  another unit (which you did of course). Lol!

Because dear thing, I also discussed it with several other car ICE
companies, actually taking the units to them
That I didnt bother explaining it, was my assumption that people like
you would have been bright enough to consider I had, for  considering
you bright enough though, I apologise as its plainly obvious I was
wrong.
>
>And one last one. Are you still "supported in email"
>Cowardly.......urrm, Custard?

Yes actually I am. Judith, though I care not a fig for your
misconstrued ideas.

"judith"  wrote in message 
news:bo8hq39cpkdgtrmpf5kth13mi142c9tjdm@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:18:16 +0000, Custard <ignore the
> facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:03:31 +0000, judith  wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:37 +0000, Custard <ignore the
>>>facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>As for your other remarks, you need to up your medication immediately.
>>>Please accept that in the manner in which it was intended.
>>
>>Oh dear, another one short of the grey stuff and unable to read
>>completey what was written
>
> Why not make it clear to me? Because as far as I can tell, you are
> reading a completely different thread to me.
>
> Come on, show me where Lavabread offered to explain why your gear
> doesnt work, or just how you expected him/her todo so without seeing
> your setup?
>
> Why is he/she a "Know All", when he/she has only provided a link to a
> website where you may be able to find an answer to your problem?
>
> Why is he/she "Rabid", when clearly your track record in this group
> and in this thread is positively shite?
>
> What facts has Lavabread ignored?
>
> Why is h/she smug or ignorant? He/she hasn't rubbed your nose in it
> like many would after your rants, and he/she is obviously ignorant of
> your setup as are we all, but he/she  has never suggested that he
> knows anything about your setup. Just pointed you to somewhere where
> you might find an answer.
>
> Oh, and while youre at it, tell us why you were thick enough to fall
> for the patter from Sony and BMW when that's all they want is for you
> to buy  another unit (which you did of course). Lol!
>
> And one last one. Are you still "supported in email"
> Cowardly.......urrm, Custard?

Thanks Judith, (I'm a he BTW) but do you really expect him to answer? :-)
This is a disability group after all. There may be mental issues why Custard 
thinks I'm the Devil Incarnate.

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:33:15 +0000, Custard <ignore the
facts-completely@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:13:51 +0000, judith  wrote:
>
>Usual self flattering shite removed

Questions too hard for you, or just impossible to answer?

>
>>Oh, and while youre at it, tell us why you were thick enough to fall
>>for the patter from Sony and BMW when that's all they want is for you
>>to buy  another unit (which you did of course). Lol!
>
>Because dear thing, I also discussed it with several other car ICE
>companies, actually taking the units to them

So totally gullible then.

>That I didnt bother explaining it, was my assumption that people like
>you would have been bright enough to consider I had,

I considered youre not bright enough.

>for  considering
>you bright enough though, I apologise as its plainly obvious I was
>wrong.
>>
>>And one last one. Are you still "supported in email"
>>Cowardly.......urrm, Custard?
>
>Yes actually I am. Judith, though I care not a fig for your
>misconstrued ideas.

Thought so. Liars usually are.

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:54:02 -0000, "Lavabread"
 wrote:


>
>Thanks Judith, (I'm a he BTW) but do you really expect him to answer? :-)

No, and he lived up to expectations.

>This is a disability group after all. There may be mental issues why Custard 
>thinks I'm the Devil Incarnate.

Does he not need a brain to have mental issues?
>