|
|
|
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:54 +1000,
group: uk.music.guitar
back
1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,, for
some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and bridge with
a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to redrill the
mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess there. I also
replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups with original
'82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never liked the sound I got
from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune problems with the beast
but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it still has original Gibson
tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck is straight..the back of the
neck seems to have suffered some form of meltdown in the laquer dept..just
normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin?
Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
$800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:54 +1000
author: Lu R
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:54 +1000, "Lu R" wrote:
>Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
>just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,, for
>some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and bridge with
>a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to redrill the
>mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess there. I also
>replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups with original
>'82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never liked the sound I got
>from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune problems with the beast
>but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it still has original Gibson
>tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck is straight..the back of the
>neck seems to have suffered some form of meltdown in the laquer dept..just
>normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
>to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin?
>Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
>$800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>
I don't think it is worth restoring it to original, but it's worth
restoring it to a playable condition....which I think can be done with
aftermarket parts for much less than $800. Definitely don't "toss it
in the bin". Good luck.
--
WE'RE BAAAACK:
http://www.Gearforumz.com
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=789610
http://www.Reviewmymusicnow.com
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:11:43 -0400
author: jtees4
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Lu R" wrote in message
news:4ac356b7$0$5420$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
> just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,,
for
> some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and bridge
with
> a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to redrill the
> mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess there. I also
> replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups with original
> '82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never liked the sound I
got
> from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune problems with the beast
> but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it still has original Gibson
> tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck is straight..the back of
the
> neck seems to have suffered some form of meltdown in the laquer dept..just
> normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
> to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the
bin?
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
for
> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>
Scalloped?
Looks like you're stuck with it...
I play scalloped-neck guitars myself and 9/10 guitar players are horrified.
Elmo' 7#9
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:14:50 +0100
author: Elmo' 7#9
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:11:43 -0400, jtees4 wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:54 +1000, "Lu R" wrote:
>
>>Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
>>just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,, for
>>some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and bridge with
>>a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to redrill the
>>mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess there. I also
>>replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups with original
>>'82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never liked the sound I got
>>from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune problems with the beast
>>but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it still has original Gibson
>>tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck is straight..the back of the
>>neck seems to have suffered some form of meltdown in the laquer dept..just
>>normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
>>to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin?
>>Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
>>$800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>>
>
>I don't think it is worth restoring it to original, but it's worth
>restoring it to a playable condition....which I think can be done with
>aftermarket parts for much less than $800. Definitely don't "toss it
>in the bin". Good luck.
Agreed, don't toss it. But if you do toss it my way.
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:38:51 -0400
author: Meat Plow
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
author: boardjunkie
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Lu R wrote:
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups
> alone for $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>
Post pictures of it .. we're let you know.
I think people who deface Gibsons should be hung in a public square,
and whipped into submission, so you treading on thin ice ;-} .
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:37:31 -0500
author: Restless Fingers Syndrome
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Lu R wrote:
> BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
> to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin?
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
Stick it on ebay as a restoration project, or a relic'd SG. it will
probably go for twice what a perfect one would go for - I don't know
why, people just love that!
--
Woody
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:50:39 +0100
author: (Woody)
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On Sep 30, 10:14 am, "Elmo' 7#9"
wrote:
> I play scalloped-neck guitars myself and 9/10 guitar players are horrified.
>
> Elmo' 7#9
Yep.....fraidy cats all of 'em. I dunno if I'd scallop an SG....they
have enough stability problems off the rack. Plus the block/trap
inlays....nope.
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
author: boardjunkie
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"boardjunkie" wrote in message
news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
> for
> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and there's
$800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming apart at the
base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem for years either.. I
love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house sings like a lady.
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:02:12 +1000
author: Lu R
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Lu R" wrote in message
news:4ac356b7$0$5420$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
> just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,,
> for some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and
> bridge with a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to
> redrill the mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess
> there. I also replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups
> with original '82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never liked
> the sound I got from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune problems
> with the beast but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it still has
> original Gibson tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck is
> straight..the back of the neck seems to have suffered some form of
> meltdown in the laquer dept..just normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is
> it worth my while restoring this SG to its original condition with maybe a
> relaquer or do I toss it in the bin? Its genuine USA. I got a quote to
> repair the hardware and pickups alone for $800..will I get my money back?
> Thanks in advance. :)
Generally speaking, if you put money into this, it will stay there, and you
will never get it back.
Generally speaking, refinishes on guitars with histories like this are a
waste of money - and I say that having been paid to do many. It will cost
hundreds of dollars and won't add much of any value.
Tuning problems are a matter of setup. It can even be that it's never been
properly intonated, and hence never *got* in tune anywhere but in one
position. This can be a result of a mis-positioned bridge, as you've had
it replaced; it can also be that the pickups are too high, and prevent
accurate tuning.
I'll suggest starting here: Unplug the guitar, and play it. Do you like
the feel, is it resonant, does it sound good acoustically? If so, take it
to a decent tech, and try various guitars with different pickups to find
ones you do like. Pay to have the guitar cleaned up and set up *properly*,
with the bridge moved into the correct position if that's what's causing the
tuning problems. Have the new pickups put in temporarily, on approval - it
is possible to temporarily install them (with clip leads) to get a very good
idea of how they sound, without committing to cutting the cables to length
and soldering. If they don't sound right, they can go right back in the
box.
HTH
-pk
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:16:45 -0400
author: Patrick Keenan
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Lu R" wrote in message
news:4ac40d9b$0$1157$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "boardjunkie" wrote in message
> news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
>> for
>> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>
> Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
>
> Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
> pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and
> there's $800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming apart
> at the base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem for years
> either.. I love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house sings like a
> lady.
A bone nut shouldn't be more $75 or so, and must include a setup (which
will be extra). $440 is wildly high, and must be including some extras -
like a complete refret and neck refinish.
If the neck joint is unstable, don't do any other work without having that
fixed - first.
For reference and comparison, this page has some pretty ordinary rates for
quality work:
http://www.12fret.com/shop/index.html
HTH
-pk
date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:20:54 -0400
author: Patrick Keenan
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Patrick Keenan" wrote in message
news:N9mdneYLbKiKvVnXnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@supernews.com...
>
> "Lu R" wrote in message
> news:4ac40d9b$0$1157$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "boardjunkie" wrote in message
>> news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>>> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
>>> for
>>> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>>
>> Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
>>
>> Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
>> pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and
>> there's $800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming
>> apart at the base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem for
>> years either.. I love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house sings like
>> a lady.
>
> A bone nut shouldn't be more $75 or so, and must include a setup (which
> will be extra). $440 is wildly high, and must be including some extras -
> like a complete refret and neck refinish.
>
> If the neck joint is unstable, don't do any other work without having that
> fixed - first.
>
> For reference and comparison, this page has some pretty ordinary rates for
> quality work:
> http://www.12fret.com/shop/index.html
>
You fell for the poor formatting and lack of punctuation like I initially
did. The bone nut is $80. $440 was for pickups and $240 was for bridge and
tailpiece.
--
Lawrence
"Butters, we're done talking about girls' balls right now. Pay
attention!" - Eric Cartman - 14 November 2007
date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:28:59 GMT
author: Lawrence?Logic
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Patrick Keenan" wrote in message
news:3Zudnfamav-CglnXnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@supernews.com...
>
> "Lu R" wrote in message
> news:4ac356b7$0$5420$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Hi folks..I've recently upgraded to a epiphone les paul standard and its
>> just lovely! I've owned my SG with scalloped neck!..purchased that way,,
>> for some 30 years and in my younger days replaced the tail piece and
>> bridge with a one piece schaller bridge.. duhh..to do that meant I had to
>> redrill the mounting holes for it..and patch up the holes..ugly mess
>> there. I also replaced the nut with a brass one..and replaced the pickups
>> with original '82 bill lawrence twin blade pickups. XL500's..I never
>> liked the sound I got from the BL's btw..and always had staying in tune
>> problems with the beast but I stuck to it like a faithful husband..it
>> still has original Gibson tuning gears which seem fine no slack..the neck
>> is straight..the back of the neck seems to have suffered some form of
>> meltdown in the laquer dept..just normal use or what?? BIG QUESTION...is
>> it worth my while restoring this SG to its original condition with maybe
>> a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin? Its genuine USA. I got a quote to
>> repair the hardware and pickups alone for $800..will I get my money back?
>> Thanks in advance. :)
>
> Generally speaking, if you put money into this, it will stay there, and
> you will never get it back.
>
> Generally speaking, refinishes on guitars with histories like this are a
> waste of money - and I say that having been paid to do many. It will
> cost hundreds of dollars and won't add much of any value.
>
> Tuning problems are a matter of setup. It can even be that it's never
> been properly intonated, and hence never *got* in tune anywhere but in one
> position. This can be a result of a mis-positioned bridge, as you've
> had it replaced; it can also be that the pickups are too high, and prevent
> accurate tuning.
>
> I'll suggest starting here: Unplug the guitar, and play it. Do you like
> the feel, is it resonant, does it sound good acoustically? If so, take
> it to a decent tech, and try various guitars with different pickups to
> find ones you do like. Pay to have the guitar cleaned up and set up
> *properly*, with the bridge moved into the correct position if that's
> what's causing the tuning problems. Have the new pickups put in
> temporarily, on approval - it is possible to temporarily install them
> (with clip leads) to get a very good idea of how they sound, without
> committing to cutting the cables to length and soldering. If they don't
> sound right, they can go right back in the box.
>
Thanx Patrick. Sounds like the wtg. I just wonder if my original SG 74
pickups were good to start and I misconceived that thinking hotter pickups
means better. I did own a terrible amp back then too.. a Fender Super Twin..
ughhh lol.. 180 watts of pure NONTONE..
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:19:58 +1000
author: Lu R
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Patrick Keenan" wrote in message
news:N9mdneYLbKiKvVnXnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@supernews.com...
>
> "Lu R" wrote in message
> news:4ac40d9b$0$1157$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "boardjunkie" wrote in message
>> news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>>> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
>>> for
>>> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>>
>> Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
>>
>> Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
>> pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and
>> there's $800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming
>> apart at the base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem for
>> years either.. I love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house sings like
>> a lady.
>
> A bone nut shouldn't be more $75 or so, and must include a setup (which
> will be extra). $440 is wildly high, and must be including some extras -
> like a complete refret and neck refinish.
>
> If the neck joint is unstable, don't do any other work without having that
> fixed - first.
How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a little from
the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:21:39 +1000
author: Lu R
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Lu R wrote:
> "Patrick Keenan" wrote in message
> news:N9mdneYLbKiKvVnXnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@supernews.com...
>> "Lu R" wrote in message
>> news:4ac40d9b$0$1157$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> "boardjunkie" wrote in message
>>> news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>>>> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone
>>>> for
>>>> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>>> Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
>>>
>>> Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
>>> pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and
>>> there's $800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming
>>> apart at the base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem for
>>> years either.. I love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house sings like
>>> a lady.
>> A bone nut shouldn't be more $75 or so, and must include a setup (which
>> will be extra). $440 is wildly high, and must be including some extras -
>> like a complete refret and neck refinish.
>>
>> If the neck joint is unstable, don't do any other work without having that
>> fixed - first.
>
> How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a little from
> the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
This might be of interest:
http://www.edroman.com/rants/les_paul_necks.htm
GDS
"Let's roll!"
date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:37:25 +0800
author: Greendistantstar
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Greendistantstar" wrote in message
news:qKadnU1tPOS901nXnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
> Lu R wrote:
>> "Patrick Keenan" wrote in message
>> news:N9mdneYLbKiKvVnXnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@supernews.com...
>>> "Lu R" wrote in message
>>> news:4ac40d9b$0$1157$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>> "boardjunkie" wrote in message
>>>> news:ec74ecf3-7f90-4745-be9f-46cd04888563@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Sep 30, 9:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>>>>> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups
>>>>> alone for
>>>>> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
>>>> Care to show me that quote? Jumpin' jesus....
>>>>
>>>> Sure ! It goes something like this..new bridge and tailpiece = $240 new
>>>> pickups $440 new bone nut $80 add some labour component to that and
>>>> there's $800!! That still doesnt address the neck that may be coming
>>>> apart at the base deal which has been the cause of my tuning problem
>>>> for years either.. I love my LP Epi..built like a brick shit house
>>>> sings like a lady.
>>> A bone nut shouldn't be more $75 or so, and must include a setup (which
>>> will be extra). $440 is wildly high, and must be including some
>>> extras - like a complete refret and neck refinish.
>>>
>>> If the neck joint is unstable, don't do any other work without having
>>> that fixed - first.
>>
>> How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a little
>> from the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
>
> This might be of interest:
>
> http://www.edroman.com/rants/les_paul_necks.htm
>
> GDS
>
> "Let's roll!"
WOW! Thanks for that..explains everything now. Damn SG neck was never made
to handle the string pressures involved.
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:12:28 +1000
author: Lu R
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Lu R" wrote:
> I just wonder if my original SG 74
> pickups were good to start and I misconceived that thinking hotter pickups
> means better.
I have an SG I bought the same year, and my recollection is that the
original pickups were nothing special.
I ended up with the "standard" late-70s replacement set of a DiMarzio
PAF in the neck position and a Super Distortion in the bridge position.
Few years after that added a single-coil in the middle. It's been a
versatile instrument over the years since, though these days I would
have put something more subtle in the bridge position.
-- Jon
--
-
"Coloured and animated, the concerts and spectacles are as
many invitations to discover the universes of musicians and
artists who tint with happiness our reality."
date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:48:39 GMT
author: Jonathan
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Lu R wrote:
> WOW! Thanks for that..explains everything now. Damn SG neck was never made
> to handle the string pressures involved.
Yes, of course. That's why half the records that lunatic Roman
listens to were recorded and toured using SGs.
rct
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
author: rct
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On 2009-10-01 02:37:25 -0400, Greendistantstar
said:
>> How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a little
>> from the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
>
> This might be of interest:
>
> http://www.edroman.com/rants/les_paul_necks.htm
ah yes, Ed Roman - Comedy website of the year. Just ask EB/MM why they
no longer deal with this guy.
--
Dan Dreibelbis, CGN (Cerified Guitar Nerd)
http://guitarnerd.ca
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=121942
http://www.myspace.com/dandreibelbis
Current Songs - "Oh No! Not Blues Again!"
date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 23:42:33 -0400
author: Daniel Dreibelbis
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
Daniel Dreibelbis wrote:
> On 2009-10-01 02:37:25 -0400, Greendistantstar
> said:
>
>>> How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a
>>> little from the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
>>
>> This might be of interest:
>>
>> http://www.edroman.com/rants/les_paul_necks.htm
>
> ah yes, Ed Roman - Comedy website of the year. Just ask EB/MM why
> they no longer deal with this guy.
I didn't say I was supporting everything that Ed Roman said; it was
merely provided as a counterpoint and possible cause.
Think what you will of Roman, he knows his stuff, and he and his guys
make some great guitars.
GDS
"Let's roll!"
date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:56:58 +0800
author: Greendistantstar
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
"Greendistantstar" wrote in message
news:Zu6dnWycNNqW51jXnZ2dnUVZ_jJi4p2d@westnet.com.au...
> Daniel Dreibelbis wrote:
>> On 2009-10-01 02:37:25 -0400, Greendistantstar
>> said:
>>
>>>> How can I tell if its unstable? I can see the glue has lifted a little
>>>> from the seam that's all. The neck is straight.
>>>
>>> This might be of interest:
>>>
>>> http://www.edroman.com/rants/les_paul_necks.htm
>>
>> ah yes, Ed Roman - Comedy website of the year. Just ask EB/MM why
>> they no longer deal with this guy.
>
> I didn't say I was supporting everything that Ed Roman said; it was merely
> provided as a counterpoint and possible cause.
>
> Think what you will of Roman, he knows his stuff, and he and his guys make
> some great guitars.
>
When you consider that the OP appreciated your link very much, no
explanation or defence is required.
Speaking of link, does anyone remember Lancelot Link, Secret Chimp?
--
Lawrence
"If I was a towel, why would I be wearing this hat and this fake
moustache" - Steven McTowelie - 19 April 2006
date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:13:20 GMT
author: Lawrence?Logic
|
Re: 1974 Standard Gibson SG dilemma
On Sep 30, 8:01 am, "Lu R" wrote:
> BIG QUESTION...is it worth my while restoring this SG
> to its original condition with maybe a relaquer or do I toss it in the bin?
> Its genuine USA. I got a quote to repair the hardware and pickups alone for
> $800..will I get my money back? Thanks in advance. :)
Sell it as is, you should get a decent price for it.
date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
author: swangdb
|
|
|