Re: Licensing - Claim - Pubs want restrictions
In message <yWsjm.221794$ay4.192807@newsfe27.ams2>, Peter J Seymour
writes
>Rafe Culpin wrote:
>> In article <PGijm.21644$Tr5.3574@newsfe13.ams2>,
>>mozng@pjsey.demon.co.uk (Peter J
>> Seymour) wrote:
>>
>>>I suspect that, in effect, he is using the newsgroup as a free
>>>archive for the licensing material.
>> That seems rather unnecessary since an archive already exists.
>> http://www.livemusicforum.co.uk/hbbulletins.htm
>>
>Well it was only a suggestion, I could be wrong. The situation kind of
>leaves us guessing. However, the incessant similar postings do in my
>opinion amount to a mis-use of the newsgroup. I would suggest that the
>best approach would be for him to set up his own moderated newsgroup
>especially for the licensing issue. Then he could just periodically
>remind us that it exists.
It's good stuff, but rather more than you want to see in a NG post.
Richard Robinson - or his robot - issues regular reminders about this
group's FAQ. It wouldn't be amiss for Mr Gall to similarly and simply
post a three-liner summary with a link to a web-site on which the full
turgid detail could be kept.
He doesn't obviously show up in M*dc*t. Wonder why not?
Assuming his BTinternet address gets read, I'll suggest it to him.
--
Peter Thomas
date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:43:11 +0100
author: Peter Thomas lid
|