The following from Hamish Birchall.

Should it be a potential criminal offence merely to sing in public, even if 
no-one complains?  Despite government advice, some councils still believe 
the answer is 'yes'.

Uncharitable souls might agree, but the government is quite sensitive on 
this issue. Over the years it has gone to some lengths to deny that this is 
one effect of the Licensing Act 2003.

As early as 18 February 2003, at the height of public controversy about 
entertainment licensing reform, it published 'The answer to 20 myths about 
public entertainment and the Licensing Bill'. Assurances included 
'Spontaneous pub sing-alongs will NOT be licensable' and 'Busking will NOT 
be licensable': 
http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/media_releases/2621.aspx

But when the Act came into force in 2005 many councils ignored the busking 
advice.  Their websites warned that busking required a Temporary Event 
Notice or Premises Licence.  Manchester City Council, for example, included 
this statement by Councillor Richard Cowell:

'... under the Licensing Act 2003, which came into force on 24 November 
2005, busking is classed as regulated entertainment. To undertake regulated 
entertainment, the premises concerned (which can include a street or other 
open space) must be licensed. This applies to all areas so includes both the 
city centre and Chorlton.'
http://www.manchester.gov.uk/info/200033/councillors_democracy_and_elections/2778/executive_member_for_the_environment_councillor_richard_cowell/5

Alarmed by council rebellion, on 11 November 2006 DCMS announced that it 
would '... make clear in legislation that the policy intention is to exclude 
e.g. carol singers, buskers, puppet shows for children and poetry readings 
from requiring a licence. This measure would most likely be delivered via 
regulation / and or Guidance.'
'Lifting the burden - Improving and realising community capacity', DCMS 
December 2006, 'Areas to be explored to achieve further reductions in 
administrative burdens', p23, para H.
http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/LiftingtheBurden.pdf

On 28 June 2007 this intention was partially implemented with the 
publication of revised Licensing Guidance, secondary legislation that 
accompanies the Act.  Busking was not explicitly cited, but the redraft 
strongly implied that buskers should qualify for the 'incidental music' 
exemption:
http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/RevisedGuidanceJune2007.pdf 
(p31, para 3.20 and following)

As a result, some councils revised their busking advice, making clear that 
they do not licence busking and that noise problems, if they occur, can be 
regulated under the Environmental Protection Act.  Bath, for example:
http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/BathNES/business/LicencesStreetTrading/busking.htm
and Torridge:
http://www..torridge.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=9296

St Albans, however, seems to think that the Licensing Act can be applied to 
buskers. In a statement published yesterday, 2nd July 2009, Lesley Cameron, 
Principal Licensing Officer for St Albans, announced the council's intention 
to licence the central market.  The idea, at least in part, is to control 
buskers in that area:

'....the licence, if granted, would mean that buskers would have to apply to 
the markets manager for permission to perform in the market place. 
Currently, buskers can perform when and where they want. The aim is to 
control and encourage street entertainment on market days, during day-time 
hours only.'

Interestingly, this announcement was published on the website of Chris 
White, Lib Dem councillor for St Albans, member of the Local Government 
Association Executive, and chair of the LGA Culture, Tourism and Sport 
Board:
http://chriswhite.mycouncillor.org.uk/archive/2009/07/02

Mr White gave evidence last year on behalf of the LGA at the public inquiry 
into the Licensing Act by the Parliamentary Culture, Media and Sport 
Committee. He opened with this response about live music:

'Live music is, like anything else which is an attraction in licensed 
premises, potentially a public order problem,' he began. 'If you start from 
that point of view, then it becomes clear what you must do...'

ENDS