Commander in Chief - Initial Thoughts - SPOILERS ep 1 and ep 2 (if you care)
My name's Jonathan. I'm a wingnut.
I have NTL cable which includes abc1 so I saw Commander in Chief (first two
episodes, shown back to back) recently.
As a fan of TWW I was looking forward to CinC - not because I was expecting
anything as good - but because anything so obviously developed in the shadow
of The West Wing would have to be reasonably interesting.
Oh dear, oh dear.
I'm afraid this is going to be one of those whingey posts about how X isn't
as good as Y because ...
The basic proposition is interesting. Female Vice President becomes
President following death of president. Interesting twist that (Republican)
President chose Independent female running mate to appeal to soccer mom, so
his death means the first Independent president, as well as the first
female.
Let's allow suspension of disbelief on the core proposition for a moment (a
moment that stretches credulity about as much as Jack Ryan's elevation to
President). So let's accept the core proposition and see how it unfolds.
There is a substantial theme about the pressures on working mums. I'll
return to that later. The secondary theme in the first episode at least is
the fact that on hearing the President is ill, all and sundry (including the
sick president) ask her to resign in order that a true Republican can take
over, because everyone knows she was only on the ticket for cosmetic
reasons. Hello! Excuse me, what about the voters? Nowhere is it even
mentioned that she was actually voted for, it doesn't seem to come into her
mind or others that people voted for them together. And how would such a
strong person (as she will no doubt turn out to be) be prepared to accept a
role as Patsy in chief? Her rationale for actually deciding to accept the
Constitution and the will of the people and claim what is rightfully hers is
pathetically single issue (not unimportant, but she does it on a whim,
almost out of spite). A complete obverse of Bartlett frequently having to
subjugate individual concerns for a wider truth.
We have Bartlett realistically agonising over the difficulties of a
civilian, liberal, president winning the credibility and support of the
Joint Chiefs. This President seems to win them over, to participate in a
preposterous charade which would put soldiers' lives in extreme danger,
within 24 hours.
The bit about the working mum bit also had potential. Jed and Abi, as we
know, have all sorts of issues which emerge from being highly intelligent,
driven people, bringing up children with enormous love but not enough time.
When Madam President Allen says "I need to clear an hour in my schedule to
see my family this evening" she's actually very much better off than all of
the working parents who don't have valets, chefs and others at beck and call
to organise everything else.
The villain is right out of a pantomime He's behind you! He's behind you!
My goodness - he even _says_ that he's behind her!
The treatment of the husband/wife relationship between Abi and Jed is
nuanced, complex and believable. President Allen does something pretty
unpleasant to her husband in episode 1 and it takes him about 4 nanoseconds
to forgive her. No subtle story lines over many episodes here, then. The
story strand which really irks is about the "first gentleman" and how he's
expected to sit in a pink upholstered room and look after the White House
menus.
Ok. So it really, really, isn't the West Wing. It's not even the same sort
of programme as the West Wing. The drama isn't dramatic, the comedy is
cheap, the pathos is from some artificial sweetener.
If you're a freeveiew or terrestrial viewer wondering what you're missing,
really don't give it another thought.
If you're a Sorkin-ista who bemoaned the crassness of S5 - you haven't seen
anything yet - look upon this and thank heaven for what might have been.
I will probably carry on watching it, out of a sense of momentum and
disbelief. But I'm not going to buy it on DVD, or watch any epsiode more
than once - not based on this initial showing.
If you really, really lower your expectations; get drunk; pay more attention
to the huge budget than the eastenders dialogue; and watch it whilst doing
something actually interesting, then you may be pleasantly surprised.
But I doubt it.
J
date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:05:14 GMT
author: jonathan flowers
|