|
|
|
date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:21:41 +0100,
group: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
back
Is a bit of science too much to ask?
I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time travel) if its
fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and frankly
impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
How in gods name does everyone telephoning the same number cause a powerful
signal to travel acrooss the universe? Its purile drivel. And suddenly the earth
now has teleport capability? Is there no script control at all?
This episode is full of it. If the writer had submitted this rubbish to a
science fiction magazine as a short story the editor would have written back
suggesting he try again sometime after his 10th birthday.
You might just as well keep waiving a magic wand about... oh wait...
Even the DrWho universe needs a little credibility. This franchise universe is
cracking up far faster than the story one.
A little creativity wouldn't go amiss either.
What we had this week was nothing more than a stage farce and a Tardis on
fishing line.
Come back bertie basset all is forgiven...
The sad thing is technically they're doing a fine enough job (apart from that
sad wobbly tardis scene) and now the writing is letting them down.
They need some real science fiction writers and fast.
date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:21:41 +0100
author: po
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
In article ,
po wrote:
>
>I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time travel) if its
>fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and frankly
>impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
>
>How in gods name does everyone telephoning the same number cause a powerful
>signal to travel acrooss the universe? Its purile drivel. And suddenly the earth
>now has teleport capability? Is there no script control at all?
>
>This episode is full of it. If the writer had submitted this rubbish to a
>science fiction magazine as a short story the editor would have written back
>suggesting he try again sometime after his 10th birthday.
>
>You might just as well keep waiving a magic wand about... oh wait...
>
>Even the DrWho universe needs a little credibility. This franchise universe is
>cracking up far faster than the story one.
>
>A little creativity wouldn't go amiss either.
>What we had this week was nothing more than a stage farce and a Tardis on
>fishing line.
>
>Come back bertie basset all is forgiven...
>The sad thing is technically they're doing a fine enough job (apart from that
>sad wobbly tardis scene) and now the writing is letting them down.
>
>They need some real science fiction writers and fast.
>
How does wired and wireless exist?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
author: (The Doctor)
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
"po" wrote in message
news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>
> They need some real science fiction writers and fast.
That's exactly what they don't need. And the last 4 years prove this quite
adequately.
I like science fiction. But when I want real science fiction, I read a
decent book. I like Dr Who. But Dr Who isn't science fiction. It's fantasy
entertainment for the family.
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:08:59 +0100
author: Stephen Wilson
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
In article <bIdak.103206$P83.72426@newsfe20.ams2>,
Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
>"po" wrote in message
>news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>>
>> They need some real science fiction writers and fast.
>
>That's exactly what they don't need. And the last 4 years prove this quite
>adequately.
>
>I like science fiction. But when I want real science fiction, I read a
>decent book. I like Dr Who. But Dr Who isn't science fiction. It's fantasy
>entertainment for the family.
>
>
Time Travel using black holes. Hmm!
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC)
author: (The Doctor)
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
"po" wrote in message
news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>
> I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time travel) if
> its
> fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and frankly
> impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek Caan.....and the
Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie Piper with a big sexy
gun....and the Tardis....and time travelling....and [perhaps the second
greatest thing ever] Space Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
Look, it's a season finale, they're just going out with a bang. Plus, once
you suspend your disbelief to accept a 900yr old alien bloke with two hearts
flying around time and space, you tend not to start nitpicking on the
science...or at least I don't, or the millions of other happy viewers. I
suggest that if you don't like it, simply watch the other side - but I bet
you don't. :)
--
Slitheen.
Manchester United - Back to Back Champions 2006/07, 2007/08 & Champions of
Europe 2008.
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:54:09 +0100
author: Slitheen
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
Slitheen wrote:
> "po" wrote in message
> news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>>
>> I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time
>> travel) if its
>> fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and
>> frankly impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
>
>
> C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek
> Caan.....and the Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie
> Piper with a big sexy gun....and the Tardis....and time
> travelling....and [perhaps the second greatest thing ever] Space
> Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
Also *wisecracking* Daleks.
Harriet: "Harriet Jones, former prime minister."
Daleks [in unison] "Yes, we know who you are!"
(kim)
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:56:34 +0100
author: kim
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:56:34 +0100, kim wrote:
> Slitheen wrote:
>> "po" wrote in message
>> news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time
>>> travel) if its
>>> fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and
>>> frankly impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
>>
>>
>> C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek
>> Caan.....and the Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie
>> Piper with a big sexy gun....and the Tardis....and time
>> travelling....and [perhaps the second greatest thing ever] Space
>> Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
>
> Also *wisecracking* Daleks.
This is the problem. It seems too much like bad fan-fic. Same as
Daleks vs Cybermen was bad fan-fic.
--
Andy Leighton => andyl@azaal.plus.com
"The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
- Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_
date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:15:28 -0500
author: Andy Leighton
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
In article <g4c2ns$tmn$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
Slitheen wrote:
>"po" wrote in message
>news:0pth64taco5ta6cfrsfqf3m5p0ilthuf26@4ax.com...
>>
>> I can forgive a little bit of scientific nonesense (like time travel) if
>> its
>> fundamental to the story but all this use of totall gibberish and frankly
>> impossible nonesense is just flat out incompetent.
>
>
>C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek Caan.....and the
>Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie Piper with a big sexy
>gun....and the Tardis....and time travelling....and [perhaps the second
>greatest thing ever] Space Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
>
>Look, it's a season finale, they're just going out with a bang. Plus, once
>you suspend your disbelief to accept a 900yr old alien bloke with two hearts
>flying around time and space, you tend not to start nitpicking on the
>science...or at least I don't, or the millions of other happy viewers. I
>suggest that if you don't like it, simply watch the other side - but I bet
>you don't. :)
Defy the prophecy!
>--
>Slitheen.
>Manchester United - Back to Back Champions 2006/07, 2007/08 & Champions of
>Europe 2008.
>
>
Man U and Die!
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:16:52 +0000 (UTC)
author: (The Doctor)
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:54:09 +0100, "Slitheen" wrote:
>
>C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek Caan.....and the
>Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie Piper with a big sexy
>gun....and the Tardis....and time travelling....and [perhaps the second
>greatest thing ever] Space Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
>
>Look, it's a season finale, they're just going out with a bang. Plus, once
>you suspend your disbelief to accept a 900yr old alien bloke with two hearts
>flying around time and space, you tend not to start nitpicking on the
>science...or at least I don't, or the millions of other happy viewers. I
>suggest that if you don't like it, simply watch the other side - but I bet
>you don't. :)
There is a big difference between nitpicking and pointing out that the entire
construction of the franchise is becoming gibberish and senseless.
Space Rhino's are one thing (I love) but fundamental non-scientific rubbish is
unforgivable and disastrous in the long term.
Thats a sure fire way to kill it off quicker than any BBC controler could dream
up.
Every universe needs rules and consistency - especially in a fantasy story
otherwise
there is no point at all - you can set up any situation and just say - "And now
the bad wolf appears and they all live happily ever after" Or perhaps - "and low
and behold twas all in an alternate universe"
That I suggest is plain unacceptable even for or especially for children.
The trouble with going out with a bang is explosions tend to leave nothing but
rubble behind.
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:04:00 +0100
author: shesaid
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
shesaid wrote:
> There is a big difference between nitpicking and pointing out that the entire
> construction of the franchise is becoming gibberish and senseless.
>
> Space Rhino's are one thing (I love) but fundamental non-scientific rubbish is
> unforgivable and disastrous in the long term.
>
I agree with the latter. On the former, I'm not much impressed by the
space rhino and the stupid beetle-thing (just how much more exactly
like a regular earth animals could they look?) but I'm prepared to put
up with the limits of human imagination as to aliens that look truly
alien as well as looking like physically and anatomical viable entities.
Enough said.
But the rubbish of the plot-lines and the repetitive nature of the "vast
war followed by a magic reset button" concept is wearing a bit thin,
especially as it seems to be all too easily predictable for next week,
and the accompanying non-scientific twaddle is not helping one jot. It
may be "fantasy not science" but it has to *make sense* in its own context.
RTD couldn't even think up a sensible means by which Davros reappeared.
How contrived is it for Dalek Caan's "emergency temporal shift", which
previously merely transported it from 21st century London to 1930s New
York, suddenly to take Caan by the most ludicrous of coincidences into
the Time Way itself and to the very point at which Davros is about to
meet his end, only to save him? It's just so naff. And how ludicrous was
the picture of Davros's exposed ribcage and beating internal organs when
he showed the Dr how he had scavenged cells for his new dalek race? Come
on! It's as bad as the old belching wheelie bin two years ago. It's bad
*fantasy* as well as bad *science*, I would say.
On the one hand RTD weaves the most ridiculous, overintricate plots
which require banal, magic reset buttons and on the other hand there are
so many of these ill-conceived little snippets of guff and twaddle that
make the conception as a whole seem very infantile whether you want to
ignore any science or not.
On the science/consistency point the Caan time-jump doesn't seem to fit
at all. I was under the impression the Time War was locked. Pretty
rubbish and pointless lock, one has to say, if a desperate dalek can
just wander through it with a blindfold over its eyestalk, as it were.
This is just the thin end of the wedge of the weakness of plot that
pervade the new Doctor Who. That's why I've only bothered to watch four
of this series' shows. Last year I watched all but four episodes and in
the first new series I think I watched every one. Extrapolating to
future series, it doesn't look good, does it?
Michael
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:48:47 +0100
author: Michael Kilpatrick
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
"shesaid" wrote in message
news:q4rm645n5hnu6ns2626g41l2fe2rmuiqmv@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:54:09 +0100, "Slitheen"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>C'mon....it's Doctor Who.....it's got Davros in it, Dalek Caan.....and the
>>Über-Milfalicious Sarah Jane Smith...and Billie Piper with a big sexy
>>gun....and the Tardis....and time travelling....and [perhaps the second
>>greatest thing ever] Space Rhinos....and you complain? ;)
>>
>>Look, it's a season finale, they're just going out with a bang. Plus, once
>>you suspend your disbelief to accept a 900yr old alien bloke with two
>>hearts
>>flying around time and space, you tend not to start nitpicking on the
>>science...or at least I don't, or the millions of other happy viewers. I
>>suggest that if you don't like it, simply watch the other side - but I bet
>>you don't. :)
>
> There is a big difference between nitpicking and pointing out that the
> entire
> construction of the franchise is becoming gibberish and senseless.
>
> Space Rhino's are one thing (I love) but fundamental non-scientific
> rubbish is
> unforgivable and disastrous in the long term.
>
> Thats a sure fire way to kill it off quicker than any BBC controler could
> dream
> up.
>
> Every universe needs rules and consistency - especially in a fantasy story
> otherwise
> there is no point at all - you can set up any situation and just say -
> "And now
> the bad wolf appears and they all live happily ever after" Or perhaps -
> "and low
> and behold twas all in an alternate universe"
>
> That I suggest is plain unacceptable even for or especially for children.
>
Funny how I've heard no children complaining. Nice of you to take it upon
yourself to complain on their behalf though, eh?
--
Slitheen.
"I've searched the phrase 'I shall walk the Earth and my hunger shall know
no bounds', but I keep getting redirected to Weight Watchers!"
Ianto Jones, Torchwood.
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:12:37 +0100
author: Slitheen
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
On 2008-06-30, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>How in gods name does everyone telephoning the same number cause a powerful
>>signal to travel acrooss the universe? Its purile drivel. And suddenly the earth
>>now has teleport capability? Is there no script control at all?
>
> How does wired and wireless exist?
You'd never get them coherent. I'd expect if you tried the experiment
you'd at most bring down the exchanges at least get a lot of busy tones.
There's a lot of very silly science in there. I just find the bits daft
and confusing.
Plot-wise - how does moving the Medusa Cascade a second ahead make it
invisible, and didn't he visit it earlier or am I thinking somewhere
else?
- Richard
--
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at gmail dot com
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ Time is a one way street,
_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ except in the Twilight Zone
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:09:47 +0100
author: Richard Corfield ondale
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
Richard Corfield wrote:
> Plot-wise - how does moving the Medusa Cascade a second ahead make it
> invisible?
I'm guessing the same way it enables the entire story to be set in an
alternate universe and so a simple press of the reset button will return
everything to normal?
(kim)
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:06:16 +0100
author: kim
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
In article , po
writes
------cut------
>How in gods name does everyone telephoning the same number cause a
>powerful signal to travel acrooss the universe? Its purile drivel.
It doesn't, then again how is a mobile phone connectable anywhere in the
universe. Of course it is a mobile phone, if every base is tricked in to
thinking that the phone is 'local' to it, it will transmit to it,
however that would only be conventional Hertzian waves so you would need
some way of linking hyperspace/underspace/etc. In order to reach a
distant mobile phone. And wouldn't a phone call made at anytime make the
far end ring at all times. It's pure hokum, but it makes a good script
device, used sparingly.
>And suddenly the earth now has teleport capability? Is there no script
>control at all?
The Earth hasn't, someone has the ability to teleport plants.
--
Ian G8ILZ
There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.
~Ansel Adams
date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 10:23:00 +0100
author: Prometheus
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
In article <+jNPVqB01zbIFwXz@spam.newbrain.demon.co.uk>, Prometheus
writes
>
>The Earth hasn't, someone has the ability to teleport plants.
Along with the planet they are on, and the entire biosphere etc.
Typing too quickly, and glare on the screen from sunlight (at least that
is my excuse).
--
Ian G8ILZ
There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.
~Ansel Adams
date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 10:32:39 +0100
author: Prometheus
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
Richard Corfield <Richard.Corfield@reverse.uk.me.littondale> wrote:
>
> There's a lot of very silly science in there. I just find the bits daft
> and confusing.
The idea of a shield around the Earth to hold the atmosphere in place is
also bad science, a planet's atmosphere is held in place by gravity.
It might make some sort of sense to "keep the heat in". But a more
obvious purpose would be to cut off communications, both with any
surviving comsats and whichever of the other planets were inhabited.
>
> Plot-wise - how does moving the Medusa Cascade a second ahead make it
> invisible, and didn't he visit it earlier or am I thinking somewhere
> else?
It's one second out of sync with the rest of the universe.
date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:08:01 GMT
author: Mark Evans
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:08:01 GMT, Mark Evans wrote:
>It's one second out of sync with the rest of the universe.
I suspect they tried to lift a very old SF idea of things being "out of phase"
without understanding the basic concept of "phase" (see subject line)
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:26:03 +0100
author: shesaid
|
Re: Is a bit of science too much to ask?
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:26:03 +0100, shesaid wrote:
>
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:08:01 GMT, Mark Evans wrote:
>
>>It's one second out of sync with the rest of the universe.
>
>I suspect they tried to lift a very old SF idea of things being "out of phase"
>without understanding the basic concept of "phase" (see subject line)
>
I understand the UK government figures now say that less than 1 in 4 UK
schools employ a Physics teacher.
Its no wonder they're a nation of cabbages that thinks gambling on the
stock exchange or "service industries" constitute some sort of replacement
for manufacturing actual goods and trading them.
Or perhaps they think that becoming an a nation composed of criminal
refugees will save them?
date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:16:36 +0100
author: the duke
|
|
|