On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:18:58 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

> In article , Dave Cross 
>  wrote:
>>On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:24:28 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article , Dave Cross
>>>  wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:54:12 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article , The
>>>>> Master  <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Book of Mormon is bad. You've never read it. But you know it's
>>>>>>> bad. And that's because....?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>His preacher told him it was.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No truthful foundation.
>>>>
>>>>But how do you know that if you've never read it?
>>>>
>>> How can there be missing books?
>>
>>What are you talking about? Please explain in more detail.
> 
> The Book Of Mormon.

Right. That's what I thought we were talking about. And what does that 
have to do with missing books?

Dave...