Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
media.tv
angel
brookside
buffy-v-slayer
cable
childrens
dawsons-creek
er
friends
hollyoaks
misc
robot-wars
sf.babylon5
sf.drwho
sf.farscape
sf.misc
sf.startrek
sf.x-files
simpsons
sky
smallville
time-team
twenty-four
us-sitcoms
west-wing
xena
  
 
date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:24:13 +0100,    group: uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5        back       
Re: Worth keeping this group?   
On 28/9/06 8:00 pm, in article
1514.497T2317T11446188angus@angusm_ANTISPEM_.demon.co.uk, "Angus Manwaring"
> 
> 
> You watch Spooks, Paul?!

He's not the only one...
> 
> I personally never miss an episode,

Again, ditto.
> but its a bit daft, even for me.

It's beginning to get just a wee bit too formulaic, even for me. I'm not
talking about the plots, (although those are starting to run thin) or the
way they /always/ manage to save the day at the eleventh hour, or the
increasing lurve interest, or the fact that Harry's Boys are the only honest
spooks around. No my problem is that they are replacing the cast every 2.5
years. 


> like Smiley's People got hijacked and the concept was written by the guy
> who wrote The Professionals,

Is that true? 

> only with no Ford Capri. I liked the original
> lead character, but pretty soon it seemed like everybody in the title
> sequence was in hiding or dead.

You've noticed. 

Oh, and I've just figured out what the exterior set for Thames House is.

Don't laugh, but it's only the Grand Masonic Lodge for the whole of England.

Andrew

-- 
 Andrew Wright              andrew@stardock.evilcritter.co.uk
Millhouse:       Well Bart, we've learnt that war is not the answer
Bart:               Except to all of America's problems

All unsolicited email from unrecognised addresses automatically deleted
date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:24:13 +0100   author:   Andrew Wright

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us