On Jul 1, 11:44 am, Nigel Barker  wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:20:35 퍝, JNugent  wrote:
> >Ed wrote:
> >> On Jun 30, 11:21 am, "John Russell" 
> >> wrote:
> >>> "Ed"  wrote in message
>
> >>>news:38978b63-688f-4d79-bb81-0dc3007775d0@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com.> >>> On Jun 30, 9:39 am, Mike Plowman  wrote:
>
> >>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Jun 30, 9:28 am, Ed  wrote:
> >>>>>> On Jun 30, 9:26 am, Mike Plowman  wrote:> >>>>> And can I therefore assume that there is nothing stopping me using one
> >>>>> of the 2 spare outlets on the LNB to run a cable to a Freesat box
> >>>>> whilst also running the Sky box?
> >>>> It would be, as they say, a piece of piss. If you can climb a ladder,> >>>> the job's a good 'un.
> >>>> Cheers Mike.
> >>>> Why are there no Freesat PVRs for sale?
> >>> How successful are Freeview PVR's? I'm sure there are sky haters wanting a
> >>> Freesat SKY but is that the bulk of the target market?
>
> >> I have Sky and am hoping that the second the Freesat PVRs go on sale
> >> sky will drop the £10 a month charge to stop people leaving
>
> >They've dropped that already, haven't they?
>
> >I don't pay it.
>
> You pay a Sky subscription of at least 16 pounds per month though don't you?
> The Sky service is now 'free' but only to Sky subscribers.
> --
>
> Cheers
>
> Nigel Barker
> Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, but it's a damned cheek to charge people to make the box work
given that I supposedly own it