|
|
|
date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:44:10 +0200,
group: uk.media.tv.misc
back
Re: Freesat Dish Question
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:20:35 +0100, JNugent wrote:
>Ed wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 11:21 am, "John Russell"
>> wrote:
>>> "Ed" wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:38978b63-688f-4d79-bb81-0dc3007775d0@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jun 30, 9:39 am, Mike Plowman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 30, 9:28 am, Ed wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 30, 9:26 am, Mike Plowman wrote:
>>>>> And can I therefore assume that there is nothing stopping me using one
>>>>> of the 2 spare outlets on the LNB to run a cable to a Freesat box
>>>>> whilst also running the Sky box?
>>>> It would be, as they say, a piece of piss. If you can climb a ladder,
>>>> the job's a good 'un.
>>>> Cheers Mike.
>>>> Why are there no Freesat PVRs for sale?
>>> How successful are Freeview PVR's? I'm sure there are sky haters wanting a
>>> Freesat SKY+ but is that the bulk of the target market?
>>
>> I have Sky+ and am hoping that the second the Freesat PVRs go on sale
>> sky will drop the £10 a month charge to stop people leaving
>
>They've dropped that already, haven't they?
>
>I don't pay it.
You pay a Sky subscription of at least 16 pounds per month though don't you?
The Sky+ service is now 'free' but only to Sky subscribers.
--
Cheers
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur
date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:44:10 +0200
author: Nigel Barker
|
Re: Freesat Dish Question
"Ed" wrote in message
news:723104f9-5818-4388-86bc-d8d48f1dee20@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 1, 11:44 am, Nigel Barker wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:20:35 +0100, JNugent wrote:
> >Ed wrote:
> >> On Jun 30, 11:21 am, "John Russell"
> >> wrote:
> >>> "Ed" wrote in message
>
> >>>news:38978b63-688f-4d79-bb81-0dc3007775d0@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Jun 30, 9:39 am, Mike Plowman wrote:
>
> >>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Jun 30, 9:28 am, Ed wrote:
> >>>>>> On Jun 30, 9:26 am, Mike Plowman wrote:
> >>>>> And can I therefore assume that there is nothing stopping me using
> >>>>> one
> >>>>> of the 2 spare outlets on the LNB to run a cable to a Freesat box
> >>>>> whilst also running the Sky box?
> >>>> It would be, as they say, a piece of piss. If you can climb a ladder,
> >>>> the job's a good 'un.
> >>>> Cheers Mike.
> >>>> Why are there no Freesat PVRs for sale?
> >>> How successful are Freeview PVR's? I'm sure there are sky haters
> >>> wanting a
> >>> Freesat SKY+ but is that the bulk of the target market?
>
> >> I have Sky+ and am hoping that the second the Freesat PVRs go on sale
> >> sky will drop the £10 a month charge to stop people leaving
>
> >They've dropped that already, haven't they?
>
> >I don't pay it.
>
> You pay a Sky subscription of at least 16 pounds per month though don't
> you?
> The Sky+ service is now 'free' but only to Sky subscribers.
> --
>
> Cheers
>
> Nigel Barker
> Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>Yes, but it's a damned cheek to charge people to make the box >work
>given that I supposedly own it
It's in the same league as finding your BBC Freesat box can't be upgraded
to allow you to subscribe to Sky or Satanta once you you realise how crap
most of the free channels are.
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:35:41 +0100
author: John Russell
|
|
|