Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
media.tv
angel
brookside
buffy-v-slayer
cable
childrens
dawsons-creek
er
friends
hollyoaks
misc
robot-wars
sf.babylon5
sf.drwho
sf.farscape
sf.misc
sf.startrek
sf.x-files
simpsons
sky
smallville
time-team
twenty-four
us-sitcoms
west-wing
xena
  
 
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:20:02 +0000,    group: uk.media.tv.misc        back       
BBC iplayer   
Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:

BBC iplayer
http://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118

I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.

Posted by: pittan
http://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m1388050761627406007

Thanks for your time.

The Votivation Team
www.votivation.com
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:20:02 +0000   author:   pittan

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:20:02 +0000, pittan 
wrote:

>
>Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:
>
>BBC iplayer
>http://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118
>
>I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
>Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>
>Posted by: pittan
>http://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m1388050761627406007
>
>Thanks for your time.
>
>The Votivation Team
>www.votivation.com

Someone on here said that if you download it,change it's name and move
it to another drive or a disc then it will play forever .I'm waiting
to find out if this is true .
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:53:56 +0000   author:   unknown

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:53:56 +0000, nobodyhome@gmail.com wrote:

>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:20:02 +0000, pittan 
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:
>>
>>BBC iplayer
>>http://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118
>>
>>I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
>>Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>>
>>Posted by: pittan
>>http://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m1388050761627406007
>>
>>Thanks for your time.
>>
>>The Votivation Team
>>www.votivation.com
>
>Someone on here said that if you download it,change it's name and move
>it to another drive or a disc then it will play forever .I'm waiting
>to find out if this is true .

It isn't.
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:21:23 +0000   author:   Derek R

Re: BBC iplayer   
On 10 Feb, 23:20, pittan  wrote:
> Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:
>
> BBC iplayerhttp://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118
>
> I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
> Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>
> Posted by: pittanhttp://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m138805076162...
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> The Votivation Teamwww.votivation.com

Don't pay the license (and learn how to spell) ..... sorted!
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:48:45 -0800 (PST)   author:   Betty Swollocks

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:48:45 -0800 (PST), Betty Swollocks
 wrote:

>On 10 Feb, 23:20, pittan  wrote:
>> Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:
>>
>> BBC iplayerhttp://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118
>>
>> I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
>> Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>>
>> Posted by: pittanhttp://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m138805076162...
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> The Votivation Teamwww.votivation.com
>
>Don't pay the license (and learn how to spell) ..... sorted!


the licence (noun)
to license (verb)
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:59:05 GMT   author:   Robert Patrick Green

Re: BBC iplayer   
pittan wrote:
> Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV
> licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to
> viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to
> download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.

You obviously know nothing about the rights issues surrounding TV programmes 
and broadcasts. Go get a clue and then we can discuss it.

-- 
Carl Waring
DigiGuide:
Full: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=1&r=1495
Freeview (free): http://getdigiguide.com/?p=4&r=1495
Web-based: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=3&r=1495
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:15:35 GMT   author:   Carl Waring

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:21:23 +0000, Derek R 
wrote:

>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:53:56 +0000, nobodyhome@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:20:02 +0000, pittan 
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Promote democratic evolution and win cash! Please vote on the following opinion if you get a moment:
>>>
>>>BBC iplayer
>>>http://www.votivation.com/opinion.php?opinion_id=3118
>>>
>>>I think that: BBC should allow viewers download and keep them indefinitely rather than set a 30 day period.
>>>Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>>>
>>>Posted by: pittan
>>>http://www.votivation.com/profile.php?profile_user_id=v4m1388050761627406007
>>>
>>>Thanks for your time.
>>>
>>>The Votivation Team
>>>www.votivation.com
>>
>>Someone on here said that if you download it,change it's name and move
>>it to another drive or a disc then it will play forever .I'm waiting
>>to find out if this is true .
>
>It isn't.

Have you tried to do it?

The answer is that the file download is given a name to allow peer to
peer sharing. Trace the file on your Hard Drive - check the options in
the BBC player - and either copy elsewhere and re-name or if you don't
want to help with others downloads ie p2p then simply move the file or
re-name it.

km
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:15:29 +0000   author:   km

Re: BBC iplayer   
In article <XmUrj.9229$j95.8095@newsfe3-win.ntli.net>,
 "Carl Waring"  writes:
> pittan wrote:
> > Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV
> > licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to
> > viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to
> > download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
> 
> You obviously know nothing about the rights issues surrounding TV programmes 
> and broadcasts. Go get a clue and then we can discuss it.

BBC commissions programme.  Production company makes programme.  BBC pays
production company for prograqmme.  Sorted.  If the BBC doesn't own the
programme on behalf of the licence-fee payer after that transaction, the
system is fucked-up somewhere.  Back in the days when the BBC made all of
its own programmes, it owned them, presumably.  If outsourcing the
production doesn't result in ownership, it wasn't outsourcing, was it?
-- 
SAm.
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:59:49 +0000   author:   (Sam Nelson)

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:59:05 GMT, Robert Patrick Green scribed:

> the licence (noun)
> to license (verb)

BBC Tax (Legalised theft)
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:19:37 +0000   author:   Ar Ar@::1.h

Re: BBC iplayer   
"Sam Nelson"  wrote in message news:lti585-kle.ln1@nntp.stir.ac.uk...
> In article <XmUrj.9229$j95.8095@newsfe3-win.ntli.net>,
>  "Carl Waring"  writes:
> > pittan wrote:
> > > Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV
> > > licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to
> > > viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to
> > > download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
> >
> > You obviously know nothing about the rights issues surrounding TV programmes
> > and broadcasts. Go get a clue and then we can discuss it.
>
> BBC commissions programme.  Production company makes programme.  BBC pays
> production company for prograqmme.  Sorted.  If the BBC doesn't own the
> programme on behalf of the licence-fee payer after that transaction, the
> system is fucked-up somewhere.

HBO took a big loss as a result of "Rome". Are you saying the BBC should
have produced the two series on its own and taken that loss instead ? Or
that the programme should never have been commissioned at all ?

> Back in the days when the BBC made all of
> its own programmes, it owned them, presumably.

They were also the days when very few TV programes were recorded.
And there was little if any after market for radio programmes.

Anyway things aren't quite that simple. ISTR The BBC had to pay rights to
the creators of either Muffin the Mule or Andy Pandy just like they do
the tellytubbies to use those characters in their programeas.


> If outsourcing the
> production doesn't result in ownership, it wasn't outsourcing, was it?


Eh ?????

Outsourcing in this context simply means buying in content for transmission
rather than tying up capital in staff and equipment by producing it yourself.

Rights ownership is irrelevant in this context. Rights ownership requires
resources in terms of staff  for such things as policing, adminstration, and
marketing and involves a far greater degree of risk. Nobody's intersted in
owning the rights to lemons.

Co-productions and outsourcing allows originators to take a greater
degree of risk and be more innovative.


michael adams






> -- 
> SAm.
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:26:01 -0000   author:   michael adams

Re: BBC iplayer   
"Ar" <Ar@::1.h> wrote in message news:1k2g2whhbjo3n$.1eq3cya53d7r7.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:59:05 GMT, Robert Patrick Green scribed:
>
> > the licence (noun)
> > to license (verb)
>
> BBC Tax (Legalised theft)

vs. 20 minutes of adverts every hour (Chav heaven)


michael adams

...
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:46:57 -0000   author:   michael adams

Re: BBC iplayer   
On 11 Feb, 09:59, s...@ssrl.org.uk (Sam Nelson) wrote:
> In article <XmUrj.9229$j95.8...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net>,
>  "Carl Waring"  writes:
>
> > pittan wrote:
> > > Because: The programmes produced byBBChas been paid through TV
> > > licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to
> > > viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to
> > > download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>
> > You obviously know nothing about the rights issues surrounding TV programmes
> > and broadcasts. Go get a clue and then we can discuss it.
>
> BBCcommissions programme.  Production company makes programme.  BBCpays
> production company for prograqmme.  Sorted.  If theBBCdoesn't own the
> programme on behalf of the licence-fee payer after that transaction, the
> system is fucked-up somewhere.  Back in the days when theBBCmade all of
> its own programmes, it owned them, presumably.  If outsourcing the
> production doesn't result in ownership, it wasn't outsourcing, was it?

The BBC has never owned it's own programmes in entirety, and doesn't
now either. Regardless of if they're made in house or not.

Independent production companies retain ownership over the programmes
they make. Scriptwriters retain copyright in their script. Rather
obviously nearly every programme uses some form of existing music,
which is owned by the music label concerned. Extracts from other
broadcasters used are owned by them. Quite a bit of the footage in
news reports comes from Reuters or the AP. Stills are owned by the
photographer or by a photo agency like Corbis. Sports events retain
their copyright in the action itself.

The BBC only licences content from all of these people on the basis of
showing it once, in a transitory way, and having to pay again if it
gets shown again. Why? Because it's cheaper. Billions and billions of
pounds cheaper a year. Your licence fee would be at least £800 a year
if the BBC bought an unlimited licence to all this stuff, even if it
could get such a licence (which it couldn't for a lot of it's most
valuable content, like book adaptions etc).

Phazer
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:10:46 -0800 (PST)   author:   The Phazer

Re: BBC iplayer   
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:15:35 GMT, Carl Waring 
wrote the following to uk.media.tv.misc:

> pittan wrote:
>> Because: The programmes produced by BBC has been paid through TV
>> licence and therefore all programmes should be made available to
>> viewers indefinitely. Moreover anyone outside the UK won't be able to
>> download these video clips so wy limit downloads for 30 days.
>
> You obviously know nothing about the rights issues surrounding TV programmes 
> and broadcasts. Go get a clue and then we can discuss it.

Votivation is a pay per click spamhaus. Its users don't care what people
think as long as they can get their commission.

mh.
-- 
http://www.nukesoft.co.uk
http://personal.nukesoft.co.uk

From address is a blackhole. Reply-to address is valid.
date: 11 Feb 2008 11:54:29 GMT   author:   Marcus Houlden

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us