|
|
|
date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:26:42 -0000,
group: uk.media.tv.hollyoaks
back
Carley Stenson see-thru ladies down below bits?
I've sourced some caps of tonight's Hollyoaks and whilst perusing them I'm
sure these show Carley's lady crease! Maybe it's wishful thinking, but
having looked for several 'seconds', obviously for research purposes I swear
this is a piece of TV magic!
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/147/hollyoaksbird0200000006wf.jpg
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/1889/hollyoaksbird0200000019bt.jpg
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/586/hollyoaksbird0200000026pv.jpg
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/4875/hollyoaksbird0200000031bu.jpg
What do you guys think? Pic three is the one that makes me think I might be
right!
Chegs.
date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:26:42 -0000
author: CheggersPop
|
Re: Carley Stenson see-thru ladies down below bits?
>> I've sourced some caps of tonight's Hollyoaks and whilst perusing them
>> I'm sure these show Carley's lady crease! Maybe it's wishful thinking,
>> but having looked for several 'seconds', obviously for research purposes
>> I swear this is a piece of TV magic!
>>
>> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/147/hollyoaksbird0200000006wf.jpg
>> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/1889/hollyoaksbird0200000019bt.jpg
>> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/586/hollyoaksbird0200000026pv.jpg
>> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/4875/hollyoaksbird0200000031bu.jpg
>>
>> What do you guys think? Pic three is the one that makes me think I might
>> be right!
>>
>> Chegs.
>
> Hard to tell. Too many dark lines in her underwear to say that one of the
> lines' may be something more natural.
>
> I know the program is a tea time affair but isn't it stupid to show people
> who have supposedly just done 'it' get out of bed and still have their
> pants on ? In this case Cameron had his boxers and Steph had her panties
> on as well. Just not realistic. Hands up those who get dressed under the
> covers afterwards.
Here's the video link!
I swear it's her lay bits!
http://www.speedyshare.com/675862524.html
Chegs,
date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:05:36 -0000
author: CheggersPop
|
Re: Carley Stenson see-thru ladies down below bits?
"CheggersPop" wrote in message
news:43fd2b92$0$23289$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
>
> I've sourced some caps of tonight's Hollyoaks and whilst perusing them I'm
> sure these show Carley's lady crease! Maybe it's wishful thinking, but
> having looked for several 'seconds', obviously for research purposes I
> swear this is a piece of TV magic!
>
> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/147/hollyoaksbird0200000006wf.jpg
> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/1889/hollyoaksbird0200000019bt.jpg
> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/586/hollyoaksbird0200000026pv.jpg
> http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/4875/hollyoaksbird0200000031bu.jpg
>
> What do you guys think? Pic three is the one that makes me think I might
> be right!
>
> Chegs.
Hard to tell. Too many dark lines in her underwear to say that one of the
lines' may be something more natural.
I know the program is a tea time affair but isn't it stupid to show people
who have supposedly just done 'it' get out of bed and still have their pants
on ? In this case Cameron had his boxers and Steph had her panties on as
well. Just not realistic. Hands up those who get dressed under the covers
afterwards.
date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:26:43 -0000
author: ?uzzled
|
|
|