|
|
|
date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100,
group: uk.media.radio.bbc-r5
back
More....
....irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
deptford.
london.
date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100
author: deptford london
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
Re: More....
On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
> wrote:
>
>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>
>> deptford.
>> london.
>>
> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>
> Regards,
What about penge and brockley?
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:04:54 +0100
author: TomTom
|
Re: More....
TomTom wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 23:22:54 +0100, David Uri said:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>>>
>>> deptford.
>>> london.
>>>
>> Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> What about penge and brockley?
>
Mornington Crescent!
date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:14:12 +0100
author: Linker3000
|
Re: More....
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0100, "deptford london"
wrote:
>...irritating than anything I've ever heard on radio.
>
>deptford.
>london.
>
Yes, I agree, deptford (sic) and london (sic) can be very irritating.
Regards,
--
David Uri.
daviduriVEST@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
http://www.daviduri.co.uk
date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0100
author: David Uri
|
|
Re: More....
| |
