Saggers.......
......is tabloid.
He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
fr.
date: 23 May 2007 13:42:30 -0700
author: Fr J. Hackett
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
Fr J. Hackett wrote:
> .....is tabloid.
>
> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:42:36 +0100
author: Stevo
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
Re: Saggers.......
He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much better this time,
and probably better than Pougatch!
"Stevo" wrote in message
news:9Qg6i.19916$j7.373826@news.indigo.ie...
> Fr J. Hackett wrote:
>> .....is tabloid.
>>
>> He'll no doubt be on R5L for years.
>
> As he came from Sky News, I'd be surprised if he wasn't "tabloid". But
> he's okay though and I find him fun to listen to..
>
>
>
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:58:40 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Saggers.......
"Dave" wrote in
news:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
> He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
difference between these two prats.
Jack
date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
author: Jack Schidt
|
Re: Saggers.......
On 30 May, 00:21, Jack Schidt wrote:
> "Dave" wrote innews:465c7831$0$8759$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> > He was on 5 before, mainly doing Tennis and moaning. Much
> > better this time, and probably better than Pougatch!
>
> Shaggers and Poogatch? I wouldn't want to have to live on the
> difference between these two prats.
I don't understand. They are both confident, professional and
authoritative.
Or do you prefer the embarrassingly awful Jacqui Oakley?
Mick.
date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:59 -0700
author: Mick Tully
|
|
Re: Saggers.......
|
