I mean, TA has had some transparent agenda-led storylines over the 
years, but this takes some beating. I mean, who ever heard of a local 
paper intruding into the forthcoming nuptials of anyone, let alone 
fabricating a racist story. This is just the wishful projection of some 
Respect/AFL activist who's landed a job at the BBC. It's insane.

What, on the other hand, is infinitely more plausible is Usha's family 
conspiring to kill her for marrying a Christian. Now what are the 
chances of that...

On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:20 +0100, Hugh Oxford wrote:

> 
> What, on the other hand, is infinitely more plausible is Usha's family
> conspiring to kill her for marrying a Christian. Now what are the
> chances of that...

Bollocks. They're Hindus, there's no real chance of that. Now if they 
were Muslims then that would be a very real possibility.

On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:20 +0100, Hugh Oxford 
wrote:

>I mean, TA has had some transparent agenda-led storylines over the 
>years, but this takes some beating. I mean, who ever heard of a local 
>paper intruding into the forthcoming nuptials of anyone, let alone 
>fabricating a racist story. This is just the wishful projection of some 
>Respect/AFL activist who's landed a job at the BBC. It's insane.

I thought she'd been at the BBC for years.  :)
TBMG
>
>What, on the other hand, is infinitely more plausible is Usha's family 
>conspiring to kill her for marrying a Christian. Now what are the 
>chances of that...

"Hugh Oxford" wrote

>I mean, TA has had some transparent agenda-led storylines over the years, 
>but this takes some beating. I mean, who ever heard of a local paper 
>intruding into the forthcoming nuptials of anyone, let alone fabricating a 
>racist story. This is just the wishful projection of some Respect/AFL 
>activist who's landed a job at the BBC. It's insane.

In fact it's a story about religious bigotry. Something you know all about 
Michael.

-- 
SB

Steve Brooks wrote:
> 
> "Hugh Oxford" wrote
> 
>> I mean, TA has had some transparent agenda-led storylines over the 
>> years, but this takes some beating. I mean, who ever heard of a local 
>> paper intruding into the forthcoming nuptials of anyone, let alone 
>> fabricating a racist story. This is just the wishful projection of 
>> some Respect/AFL activist who's landed a job at the BBC. It's insane.
> 
> In fact it's a story about religious bigotry. Something you know all 
> about Michael.
> 

Well obviously I know a lot about it, but not all about it. But I've 
never encountered such an improbable scenario. Local papers are 
concerned with planning, pets, roads, school sports days and the 
occasional sick child, not with inter-religious marriage.

Derek Turner wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:20 +0100, Hugh Oxford wrote:
> 
> >
> > What, on the other hand, is infinitely more plausible is Usha's family
> > conspiring to kill her for marrying a Christian. Now what are the
> > chances of that...
> 
> Bollocks. They're Hindus, there's no real chance of that. Now if they
> were Muslims then that would be a very real possibility.

But can't the obnoxious little bitch be killed off anyway?  Just for the
fun of it, I mean.

-- 
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.