On 23 Apr, 20:57, S.  wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:12:22 -0700 (PDT), 1Z 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On 19 Apr, 20:59, S.  wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:37:11 +0100, Tiddy Ogg
>
> >>  wrote:
> >> >It's really not very good, is it?  They're trying to bring "guests" to
> >> >try livening it up, as replacements for the dreadful Brigstock, but
> >> >even Barry Cryer  was pretty tepid last week, and that Andy Solzman's
> >> >turgid mumblings this time round were a total bore.
> >> >The singer is usually pretty poor, too, and his dalek impression has
> >> >long since worn thin.  The Huddlines of bygone days seems from memory
> >> >to have done a much better job.
>
> >> No. it's not, and it's been going this way for a long time. I am a
> >> total monarchist, but I believe that as far as the BBC is concerned,
> >> they only exist to provide a cheap source of strained and tortured
> >> "humour" for trash like this, News Quiz, HIGNFY on BBC1, etc, ad
> >> nauseum.
>
> >Give us *repectful* satire, dammit!
>
> As usual, the point goes "whooooooosh", sailing straight over the top.
> Every week, it's the same recycled, tired rubbish which they *think*
> is satire. Much like your postings.

Since you can do so much better, you should start your own revue. You
could
call it "Beyond the Pale" or "The Now things are much worse than they
were in my day Show".