On Jan 11, 7:08 am, "Tomm-y"  wrote:
> Another Year wrote:
>
> > Who are you calling a swine, Kunty?
>
> I'd have said comparing you with swine is only an insult to swine :)
>
> Have a Good Day

IAWTP

Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.

Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then keep 
stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies in uls are 
going to suss us out. They will probably eventually realise we are just 
socks - and you should stop using that ah sock too! He never sounds like a 
true Yankee and he even axed me if I was a communist the other day! Well, I 
ask you...

(Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you were me 
and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)

I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much time and 
'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just say, it's 
goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe tomorrow or the next day.

Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's Aunty Lily 
and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the communications 
from you all. We did call around to see Eddie Bernard's folks but they have 
never, ever gotten over their very sad loss. It is all made much worse these 
days when the likes of poor Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way 
for honour killings. Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much 
honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot did.

One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up with the 
crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to publish or post. He 
will get his comeuppance just like his "German speaking controversial 
historian" got his in the High Court.

"Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>
> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then keep 
> stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies in uls are 
> going to suss us out. They will probably eventually realise we are just 
> socks - and you should stop using that ah sock too! He never sounds like a 
> true Yankee and he even axed me if I was a communist the other day! Well, 
> I ask you...
>
> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you were me 
> and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>
> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much time and 
> 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just say, it's 
> goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe tomorrow or the next 
> day.
>
> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's Aunty 
> Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the 
> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie Bernard's 
> folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad loss. It is all 
> made much worse these days when the likes of poor Eddie's demise is pushed 
> to one side to make way for honour killings. Well! If our Eddie did not 
> lay himself down with much honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot 
> did.
>
> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up with 
> the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to publish or post. 
> He will get his comeuppance just like his "German speaking controversial 
> historian" got his in the High Court.
>

Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged if any 
strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their hard drives.

Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding messages in 
my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which probably does not carry 
well if you're not in on it.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)

{{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.

Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)

Take care all!

Chief Collard wrote:
> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>
>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then keep 
>> stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies in uls are 
>> going to suss us out. They will probably eventually realise we are just 
>> socks - and you should stop using that ah sock too! He never sounds like a 
>> true Yankee and he even axed me if I was a communist the other day! Well, 
>> I ask you...
>>
>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you were me 
>> and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>
>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much time and 
>> 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just say, it's 
>> goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe tomorrow or the next 
>> day.
>>
>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's Aunty 
>> Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the 
>> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie Bernard's 
>> folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad loss. It is all 
>> made much worse these days when the likes of poor Eddie's demise is pushed 
>> to one side to make way for honour killings. Well! If our Eddie did not 
>> lay himself down with much honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot 
>> did.
>>
>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up with 
>> the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to publish or post. 
>> He will get his comeuppance just like his "German speaking controversial 
>> historian" got his in the High Court.
>>
> 
> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged if any 
> strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their hard drives.
> 
> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding messages in 
> my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which probably does not carry 
> well if you're not in on it.
> 
> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
> 
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
> 
> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
> 
> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
> 
> Take care all! 
> 
> 

Quiet, yon sock.
-- 
ah

"Chief Collard"  wrote in
news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com: 

> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
> 
> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then
> keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies
> in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably eventually realise
> we are just socks - and you should stop using that ah sock too! He
> never sounds like a true Yankee and he even axed me if I was a
> communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
> 
> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
> 

Oh yes, I remember. HA! Good job nobody knows about this here in sleepy
surrey. 


> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much time
> and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just say,
> it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe tomorrow or
> the next day. 
> 

Ok. Maybe I will change my writing style. Is ThIs BeTtEr?

> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's Aunty
> Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the
> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie Bernard's
> folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad loss. It is
> all made much worse these days when the likes of poor Eddie's demise
> is pushed to one side to make way for honour killings. Well! If our
> Eddie did not lay himself down with much honour, well, I never ever
> knew a bloke wot did. 
> 

St. Eddie was one in a bazillion, so he was. God bless his soul. If only
he was here to see DL today he would be dead proud and that. 

> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up
> with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to publish
> or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German speaking
> controversial historian" got his in the High Court. 
> 
> 
> 

I bet he was sued like wot I was by the old skool all them times.
-- 

P
h
i
l

K
y
l
e
 
W
o
z

E
r
e

ah  wrote in
news:478827f7$0$40800$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 

> Chief Collard wrote:
>> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
>> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>>
>>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then
>>> keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies
>>> in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably eventually
>>> realise we are just socks - and you should stop using that ah sock
>>> too! He never sounds like a true Yankee and he even axed me if I was
>>> a communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
>>>
>>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
>>> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>>
>>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much
>>> time and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just
>>> say, it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe
>>> tomorrow or the next day.
>>>
>>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's
>>> Aunty Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the
>>> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie
>>> Bernard's folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad
>>> loss. It is all made much worse these days when the likes of poor
>>> Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way for honour
>>> killings. Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much
>>> honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot did.
>>>
>>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up
>>> with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to
>>> publish or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German
>>> speaking controversial historian" got his in the High Court.
>>>
>> 
>> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged if
>> any strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their hard
>> drives. 
>> 
>> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding
>> messages in my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which
>> probably does not carry well if you're not in on it.
>> 
>> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
>> 
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
>> 
>> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
>> 
>> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
>> 
>> Take care all! 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Quiet, yon sock.

Oops, slipped out of character!
-- 

P
h
i
l

K
y
l
e
 
W
o
z

E
r
e

"Chief Collard"  wrote in
news:M4Phj.307943$ZO3.76032@fe02.news.easynews.com: 

> 
> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>
>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then
>> keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies
>> in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably eventually
>> realise we are just socks - and you should stop using that ah sock
>> too! He never sounds like a true Yankee and he even axed me if I was
>> a communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
>>
>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
>> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>
>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much time
>> and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just say,
>> it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe tomorrow or
>> the next day.
>>
>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's
>> Aunty Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the 
>> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie
>> Bernard's folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad
>> loss. It is all made much worse these days when the likes of poor
>> Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way for honour killings.
>> Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much honour, well, I
>> never ever knew a bloke wot did.
>>
>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up
>> with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to
>> publish or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German
>> speaking controversial historian" got his in the High Court.
>>
> 
> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged if
> any strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their hard
> drives. 
> 
> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding
> messages in my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which
> probably does not carry well if you're not in on it.
> 
> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
> 
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
> 
> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
> 
> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
> 
> Take care all! 
> 
> 
> 

I replied to it. Woops.
-- 

P
h
i
l

K
y
l
e
 
W
o
z

E
r
e

Phil Kyle 2008 wrote:
> ah  wrote in
> news:478827f7$0$40800$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 
> 
>> Chief Collard wrote:
>>> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
>>> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>>>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>>>
>>>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break then
>>>> keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them dummies
>>>> in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably eventually
>>>> realise we are just socks - and you should stop using that ah sock
>>>> too! He never sounds like a true Yankee and he even axed me if I was
>>>> a communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
>>>>
>>>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
>>>> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>>>
>>>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much
>>>> time and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will just
>>>> say, it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe
>>>> tomorrow or the next day.
>>>>
>>>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's
>>>> Aunty Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get the
>>>> communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie
>>>> Bernard's folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very sad
>>>> loss. It is all made much worse these days when the likes of poor
>>>> Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way for honour
>>>> killings. Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much
>>>> honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot did.
>>>>
>>>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put up
>>>> with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to
>>>> publish or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German
>>>> speaking controversial historian" got his in the High Court.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged if
>>> any strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their hard
>>> drives. 
>>> 
>>> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding
>>> messages in my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which
>>> probably does not carry well if you're not in on it.
>>> 
>>> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
>>> 
>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
>>> 
>>> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
>>> 
>>> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
>>> 
>>> Take care all! 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Quiet, yon sock.
> 
> Oops, slipped out of character!

You, too, sock.
-- 
ah

ah  wrote in
news:47898dc2$0$35903$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 

> Phil Kyle 2008 wrote:
>> ah  wrote in
>> news:478827f7$0$40800$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 
>> 
>>> Chief Collard wrote:
>>>> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>>>>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>>>>
>>>>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break
>>>>> then keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them
>>>>> dummies in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably
>>>>> eventually realise we are just socks - and you should stop using
>>>>> that ah sock too! He never sounds like a true Yankee and he even
>>>>> axed me if I was a communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
>>>>>
>>>>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
>>>>> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much
>>>>> time and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will
>>>>> just say, it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe
>>>>> tomorrow or the next day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's
>>>>> Aunty Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get
>>>>> the communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie
>>>>> Bernard's folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very
>>>>> sad loss. It is all made much worse these days when the likes of
>>>>> poor Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way for honour
>>>>> killings. Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much
>>>>> honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot did.
>>>>>
>>>>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put
>>>>> up with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to
>>>>> publish or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German
>>>>> speaking controversial historian" got his in the High Court.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged
>>>> if any strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their
>>>> hard drives. 
>>>> 
>>>> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding
>>>> messages in my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which
>>>> probably does not carry well if you're not in on it.
>>>> 
>>>> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
>>>> 
>>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
>>>> 
>>>> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
>>>> 
>>>> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
>>>> 
>>>> Take care all! 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Quiet, yon sock.
>> 
>> Oops, slipped out of character!
> 
> You, too, sock.

Shut up, will I!
-- 

P
h
i
l

K
y
l
e
 
W
o
z

E
r
e

Phil Kyle 2008 wrote:
> ah  wrote in
> news:47898dc2$0$35903$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 
> 
>> Phil Kyle 2008 wrote:
>>> ah  wrote in
>>> news:478827f7$0$40800$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com: 
>>> 
>>>> Chief Collard wrote:
>>>>> "Chief Collard"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:xAOhj.301222$q04.193606@fe10.news.easynews.com...
>>>>>> Well, wot a start to the New Year that wos and no mistake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Listen, we better stop starting posting together after a break
>>>>>> then keep stopping posting together at the same time or else them
>>>>>> dummies in uls are going to suss us out. They will probably
>>>>>> eventually realise we are just socks - and you should stop using
>>>>>> that ah sock too! He never sounds like a true Yankee and he even
>>>>>> axed me if I was a communist the other day! Well, I ask you...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Do you remember when them demon.local Old Skoolers discovered you
>>>>>> were me and Paul was all of us, eh? This must never happen again.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cannot reply to all of your posts 'cos I haven't got that much
>>>>>> time and 'cos you know we rote most of them together, so I will
>>>>>> just say, it's goodbye from me, and goodbye from him, until maybe
>>>>>> tomorrow or the next day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eeeeeeh, we had a grand time at the New Year when we seen Paul's
>>>>>> Aunty Lily and her Wilf, and they were very, very pleased to get
>>>>>> the communications from you all. We did call around to see Eddie
>>>>>> Bernard's folks but they have never, ever gotten over their very
>>>>>> sad loss. It is all made much worse these days when the likes of
>>>>>> poor Eddie's demise is pushed to one side to make way for honour
>>>>>> killings. Well! If our Eddie did not lay himself down with much
>>>>>> honour, well, I never ever knew a bloke wot did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One day, the truth will be told, but in the meantime we must put
>>>>>> up with the crap that people like Fat Old Jimmy Follett decide to
>>>>>> publish or post. He will get his comeuppance just like his "German
>>>>>> speaking controversial historian" got his in the High Court.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Woops! That message should have gone by email. I would be obliged
>>>>> if any strangers reading it would wipe it - securely - from their
>>>>> hard drives. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Meantime, take care everyone, and just ignore the daft sounding
>>>>> messages in my original post. It was all a bit of a joke which
>>>>> probably does not carry well if you're not in on it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYBODY!!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (KISSES!)
>>>>> 
>>>>> {{{{{{{{{{{ Jim Follett }}}}}}} = cuddles to JF.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Happy 70th Jimbo! (When is it, by the way?)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Take care all! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Quiet, yon sock.
>>> 
>>> Oops, slipped out of character!
>> 
>> You, too, sock.
> 
> Shut up, will I!

*I*, I do know, will.
-- 
ah