|
|
|
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:06:32 GMT,
group: uk.media.radio.bbc-r4
back
JF's stalkers
Before too many posters make fools of themselves by jumping on the "poor old
JF, being followed everywhere by stalkers" bandwagon, they should perhaps
dig around in the Google news archive of some years ago to find out *why*
some people changed their posting style and decided to go after James
Follett and the crowd he hung around with. The same crowd he posted with,
bullied with, threatened with, and as group harassed other posters in those
days.
All I ever asked from them was an apology for the way they had bullied and
harassed many other very harmless and very innocent posters, mainly ladies.
James Follett, and his close knit cronies from the Old Skool demon.local
group laughed at me, just as they had laughed at many others over the years.
They boasted and claimed demon.local was "untouchable" and they had seen off
much better adversaries than me and some of my friends. I doubt they can now
make that claim if they ever look in to demon.local.
They never apologised so I and others pursue them, years and years after the
events.
A promise is a promise.
Do be careful of jumping on a propaganda bandwagon.
date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:34:36 GMT
author: Santa's Little Helper c/
|
Re: JF's stalkers
"BrianE" wrote in message
news:MPG.21d627b2b47903e989708@news.motzarella.org...
> In article <fzUaj.75372$WF3.41297@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
> c/oSanta@northpole.ru says...
>
>> A promise is a promise.
>>
>> Do be careful of jumping on a propaganda bandwagon.
>
> You need professional help.
>
> --
> Thar's gold in them thar hills
date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:34:06 GMT
author: Santa's Little Helper c/
|
Re: JF's stalkers
"Santa's Little Helper" <c/oSanta@northpole.ru> wrote in message
news:xWUaj.27694$Qm1.17385@fe01.news.easynews.com...
>
> "BrianE" wrote in message
> news:MPG.21d627b2b47903e989708@news.motzarella.org...
>> In article <fzUaj.75372$WF3.41297@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
>> c/oSanta@northpole.ru says...
>>
>>> A promise is a promise.
>>>
>>> Do be careful of jumping on a propaganda bandwagon.
>>
>> You need professional help.
>
> Don't you worry about me, Daft Brian. I've got a full paid up squad of
> professionals just ready to jump in if anything should happen to me.
>
>
date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:34:43 GMT
author: Santa's Little Helper c/
|
Re: JF's stalkers
"BrianE" wrote in message
news:MPG.21d62ef32357933398970b@news.motzarella.org...
> In article <xWUaj.27694$Qm1.17385@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
> c/oSanta@northpole.ru says...
>>
>> "BrianE" wrote in message
>> news:MPG.21d627b2b47903e989708@news.motzarella.org...
>> > In article <fzUaj.75372$WF3.41297@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
>> > c/oSanta@northpole.ru says...
>> >
>> >> A promise is a promise.
>> >>
>> >> Do be careful of jumping on a propaganda bandwagon.
>> >
>> > You need professional help.
>>
>> Don't you worry about me, Daft Brian. I've got a full paid up squad of
>> professionals just ready to jump in if anything should happen to me.
>>
>>
>>
> Righto.
> --
> Thar's gold in them thar hills
date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:35:37 GMT
author: Santa's Little Helper c/
|
Dykes
Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
--
How unlike the home life of our own dear Queen.
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:06:32 GMT
author: Frederick Williams Frederick Williams@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid
|
Re: Dykes
Frederick Williams wrote:
> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
Not sure. I wonder if fair representation applies fairly though, given
that only 2.5% of the population are into homosexuality.
I'm also waiting for that Radio 4 documentary about the fact that only
3% of practising homosexuals have taken up Civil Partnerships (a
generous assumption).
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:16:23 +0000
author: turnitup same@same
|
Re: Dykes
Frederick Williams goes:
>Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
Greg?
--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:36:47 +0100
author: Alan Hope
|
Re: Dykes
Frederick Williams" <"Frederick Williams wrote:
> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
Offa?
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:39:18 +0100
author: John of Aix
|
Re: Dykes
John of Aix wrote:
> Frederick Williams" <"Frederick Williams wrote:
>> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>
> Offa?
>
>
Dick Van?
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:40:46 +0000
author: turnitup same@same
|
Re: Dykes
turnitup wrote:
> John of Aix wrote:
>> Frederick Williams" <"Frederick Williams wrote:
>>> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>>
>> Offa?
>>
>>
> Dick Van?
Little boy with finger in........?
--
Remove Frontal Lobes to reply direct.
"These people believe the souls of fried space aliens inhabit their
bodies and hold soup cans to get rid of them. I should care what they
think?"...Valerie Emmanuel
Les Hemmings a.a #2251 SA
date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:52:53 -0000
author: Les Hemmings
|
Re: Dykes
Frederick Williams wrote:
> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:49:09 -0800 (PST)
author: Robert Carnegie
|
Re: Dykes
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:49:09 -0800 (PST), Robert Carnegie
wrote:
>Frederick Williams wrote:
>> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>
>Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
I guess he's talking about Sue Arnold. Don't know anything about her
sexual preferences, but she has a nice voice, and that's what matters
on radio.
I guess the OP would rather fantasize about all female presenters so,
for health and safety reasons, the BBC must employ a few "otherwise
orientated" or he'd be suing them for RSI or other wrist strains.
Tiddy Ogg.
http://www.tiddyogg.co.uk
date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:05:28 +0000
author: Tiddy Ogg
|
Re: Dykes
Tiddy Ogg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:49:09 -0800 (PST), Robert Carnegie
> wrote:
>
> >Frederick Williams wrote:
> >> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
> >
> >Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
> I guess he's talking about Sue Arnold.
No, Alice.
--
How unlike the home life of our own dear Queen.
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:40:53 GMT
author: Frederick Williams Frederick Williams@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid
|
Re: Dykes
Robert Carnegie goes:
>Frederick Williams wrote:
>> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>
>Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
Malcolm Arnold. Used to be Master of the Queen's Musick [sic][sick].
--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:56:37 +0100
author: Alan Hope
|
Re: Dykes
On 27 Dec, 14:56, Alan Hope wrote:
> Robert Carnegie goes:
>
> >Frederick Williams wrote:
> >> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>
> >Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
>
> Malcolm Arnold. Used to be Master of the Queen's Musick [sic][sick].
>
No he didn't - are you thinking of Malcolm Williamson?
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:59:27 -0800 (PST)
author: Andrew Taylor
|
Re: Dykes
Andrew Taylor goes:
>On 27 Dec, 14:56, Alan Hope wrote:
>> Robert Carnegie goes:
>> >Frederick Williams wrote:
>> >> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>> >Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
>> Malcolm Arnold. Used to be Master of the Queen's Musick [sic][sick].
>No he didn't - are you thinking of Malcolm Williamson?
Yes, but that wouldn't have been funny. He's not called Arnold, you
see.
--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:53:10 +0100
author: Alan Hope
|
Re: Dykes
On 31 Dec, 16:53, Alan Hope wrote:
> Andrew Taylor goes:
>
> >On 27 Dec, 14:56, Alan Hope wrote:
> >> Robert Carnegie goes:
> >> >Frederick Williams wrote:
> >> >> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
> >> >Why do you ask, and who's "Arnold"?
> >> Malcolm Arnold. Used to be Master of the Queen's Musick [sic][sick].
> >No he didn't - are you thinking of Malcolm Williamson?
>
> Yes, but that wouldn't have been funny. He's not called Arnold, you
> see.
Arnold Bax then, though he was Master of the _King's_ Music.. Tricky
business, this "being funny".
date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:28:33 -0800 (PST)
author: Andrew Taylor
|
Re: Dykes
On 22 Dec 2007, 14:16, turnitup <same@same> wrote:
> Frederick Williams wrote:
> > Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>
> Not sure. I wonder if fair representation applies fairly though, given
> that only 2.5% of the population are into homosexuality.
>
> I'm also waiting for that Radio 4 documentary about the fact that only
> 3% of practising homosexuals have taken up Civil Partnerships (a
> generous assumption).
Did they actually say that, or is that your figure? 'Cos you keep
getting your sums
wrong.
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:27:04 -0800 (PST)
author: 1Z
|
Re: Dykes
1Z wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2007, 14:16, turnitup <same@same> wrote:
>>
>> I'm also waiting for that Radio 4 documentary about the fact that only
>> 3% of practising homosexuals have taken up Civil Partnerships (a
>> generous assumption).
>
> Did they actually say that, or is that your figure? 'Cos you keep
> getting your sums
> wrong.
You do the maths. 2.5% of the pop. practise homosexuality, 16,000 civil
partnerships (and we don't know how many have failed).
date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:43:20 +0000
author: turnitup same@same
|
Re: Dykes
"Les Hemmings" wrote in message
news:5t5mafF1c6e5gU1@mid.individual.net...
> turnitup wrote:
>> John of Aix wrote:
>>> Frederick Williams" <"Frederick Williams wrote:
>>>> Toksvig, Balding, Arnold. Any more?
>>>
>>> Offa?
>>>
>>>
>> Dick Van?
>
> Little boy with finger in........?
...of Edinburgh...?
date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:08:36 -0000
author: gm6trs gm6trsatklara.co.uk
|
|
|