turnitup goes:

>Alan Hope wrote:

>>> Err, the internet? You can run a webserver for peanuts. Call it jobs.gov.uk.
 
>> Those ads are for jobs you neither need nor want to have advertised
>> widely. It makes much more sense to have them targetted, which is what
>> happened when they were all in New Society, and what happens now
>> they've moved to the Graun. The last thing you want is to put them on
>> a website called jobs.gov.uk. 

>If the only place the state is advertising is in the Guardian, and the 
>only jobs advertised in the Guardian are jobs in the state, 

Well that part's not true already. 

>then the 
>Guardian would appear to be somewhat redundant. 

I dare say that makes sense to you. 

>Furthermore, given the 
>big "diversity" initiatives, why are they advertising in one of the 
>least read journals in Britain, moreover one of the furthest left? 

Well, that's only your own fucked-up nutbar view, Calwell. 

>There 
>should be four times as many state job ads in the Mail than in the 
>Guardian. 

But nobody qualified to fill them would ever read the Mail. 

>Perhaps you can have all the diversity you like, as long as 
>it's broadly centre left.

And your system is so much better, right? 


-- 
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com

Same bloody sketches every week. They're quite good sketches, mostly. But if 
they couldn't think of any others they should at least have made these 
progress and tell a story.

-- 

SB

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:56:48 GMT, "Steve Brooks"
<steveb@postmaster.invalid> wrote:

>Same bloody sketches every week. They're quite good sketches, mostly. But if 
>they couldn't think of any others they should at least have made these 
>progress and tell a story.

Most I didn't mind, but that language school thing was exactly the
same, true.

Tiddy Ogg.
http://www.tiddyogg.co.uk