Anyone else having problems with the Radio 4 website at 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/?

The DA wrote:
> Anyone else having problems with the Radio 4 website at
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/?

Nope... fine here.

L

-- 
Remove Frontal Lobes to reply direct.

"These people believe the souls of fried space aliens inhabit their
bodies and hold soup cans to get rid of them. I should care what they
think?"...Valerie Emmanuel

Les Hemmings  a.a #2251 SA

"Les Hemmings"  wrote in message 
news:5rfsfhF12005oU1@mid.individual.net...
> The DA wrote:
>> Anyone else having problems with the Radio 4 website at
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/?
>
> Nope... fine here.
>
> L
>
> -- 
> Remove Frontal Lobes to reply direct.
>
> "These people believe the souls of fried space aliens inhabit their
> bodies and hold soup cans to get rid of them. I should care what they
> think?"...Valerie Emmanuel
>
> Les Hemmings  a.a #2251 SA
>
>
>
Back now.

And "The DA"  was like:

> Anyone else having problems with the Radio 4 website at 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/?

Yes, I have a problem with the fact that it wastes electrons by giving
prominence to two of the most pointless activities ever undertaken by
humankind: Gardners' Question Time and The Archers.

Shortly after Saint Diana of Wales died, Gardners' Question Time came
on the car radio while I was too busy with traffic to turn it off. "At
least," I remember thinking, "this will be a break from hearing about
Diana, Princess of Wotsits." First question: "What plants can the
panel recommend for our club's Diana PoW memorial garden?"

FFS.

-- 
| Patrick Hardlentil -  patrick@dogslobber.demon.co.uk
| Like death in a top hat

In message , Patrick 
Hardlentil  writes

>Yes, I have a problem with the fact that it wastes electrons by giving
>prominence to two of the most pointless activities ever undertaken by
>humankind: Gardners' Question Time and The Archers.

Fine. So don't listen them.

If you don't like fox-hunting, don't hunt foxes; if you don't like the 
strange hobbies that queers enjoy, don't indulge in them.

-- 
On 25th November 2007 James Follett caused no end of confusion and frantic
searches for hidden subtexts that aren't there by stating that he didn't use
personal insults. He commented 'Sometimes I'm tempted by stupidity and
perverse fuckwittedness to revert to my old ways but I can't be bothered'.

Patrick Hardlentil wrote:
> And "The DA"  was like:
> 
>> Anyone else having problems with the Radio 4 website at 
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/?
> 
> Yes, I have a problem with the fact that it wastes electrons by giving
> prominence to two of the most pointless activities ever undertaken by
> humankind: Gardners' Question Time and The Archers.
> 
> Shortly after Saint Diana of Wales died, Gardners' Question Time came
> on the car radio while I was too busy with traffic to turn it off. "At
> least," I remember thinking, "this will be a break from hearing about
> Diana, Princess of Wotsits." First question: "What plants can the
> panel recommend for our club's Diana PoW memorial garden?"
> 
> FFS.
> 

I stopped to think about the number of people the BBC retains just to 
produce 15 minutes of TA every day. What an army!

And JF  was like:

> In message , Patrick
> Hardlentil  writes
>
>>Yes, I have a problem with the fact that it wastes electrons by
>>giving prominence to two of the most pointless activities ever
>>undertaken by humankind: Gardners' Question Time and The Archers.
                               ^ my mistake.

> Fine. So don't listen them.

What makes you think I do?

> If you don't like fox-hunting, don't hunt foxes; if you don't like
> the strange hobbies that queers enjoy, don't indulge in them.

Would your hobby-horse like a sugarlump?

-- 
| Patrick Hardlentil -  patrick@dogslobber.demon.co.uk
| Text passed for distribution as an aid to the Dark cause