|
|
|
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0000,
group: uk.media.radio.bbc-r2
back
Re: MI5 Persecution: he's an idiot you know 3/11/00 (18556)
wrote in message news:m07101719523982@4ax.com...
>
> Balham High Road (3/Nov/2000)
>
> Certainty level: 60%
>
> On 3 November 2000, I had just got off the bus in Balham High Road,
> when I heard a group of schoolgirls shouting and laughing. One of them
> yelled;
>
> "He's an idiot you know."
>
Yep I think youve managed to prove them right Id say the certainty was 100%
without doubt.
date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:29:38 GMT
author: Terry
|
Save jobs - sack Ross
If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
not sack all those employees.
Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
people they can employ!
Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
wanting to listen to him anyway.
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0000
author: Meee
|
Re: Save jobs - sack Ross
Meee wrote:
> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
> not sack all those employees.
>
> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
> people they can employ!
>
> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
> wanting to listen to him anyway.
I bet you are a Vine fan.
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:42:24 +0000
author: dennis@fake dennis@fake
|
Re: Save jobs - sack Ross
dennis@fake wrote:
> Meee wrote:
>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>> not sack all those employees.
>>
>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>> people they can employ!
>>
>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
>
> I bet you are a Vine fan.
Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.
--
|\ /| ark Fraser /mfraser@ukgateway.net
| \/ | Somerset /Using Knode on Kubuntu 7.04
| |___________/You know what the sig means!
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:39:21 +0000
author: Mark Fraser
|
Re: Save jobs - sack Ross
Mark Fraser wrote:
> dennis@fake wrote:
>
>> Meee wrote:
>>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>>> not sack all those employees.
>>>
>>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>>> people they can employ!
>>>
>>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
>> I bet you are a Vine fan.
>
> Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.
>
Ok, who do you think is value for money, Brand ?
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:30:24 +0000
author: dennis@fake dennis@fake
|
Re: Save jobs - sack Ross
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:30:24 +0000, "dennis@fake" <dennis@fake> wrote:
>Mark Fraser wrote:
>> dennis@fake wrote:
>>
>>> Meee wrote:
>>>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>>>> not sack all those employees.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>>>> people they can employ!
>>>>
>>>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>>>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>>>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
>>> I bet you are a Vine fan.
>>
>> Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.
>>
>Ok, who do you think is value for money, Brand ?
How about employing disc jockeys instead of celebrities? How about
bringing in new talent that cannot demand high wages then not renewing
their contract if they do?
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:42:13 GMT
author: Scott
|
|
|