Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
media
animation.anime
books.sf
broadband
broadcast.commercials
dvd
films
films.carry-on
home-cinema
media
newspapers
postproduction
radio.archers
radio.bbc-r1
radio.bbc-r2
radio.bbc-r3
radio.bbc-r4
radio.bbc-r5
radio.bbc-world-service
radio.hospital
radio.misc
radio.radcliffe
  
 
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0000,    group: uk.media.radio.bbc-r2        back       
Re: MI5 Persecution: he's an idiot you know 3/11/00 (18556)   
wrote in message news:m07101719523982@4ax.com...
>
> Balham High Road (3/Nov/2000)
>
> Certainty level: 60%
>
> On 3 November 2000, I had just got off the bus in Balham High Road,
> when I heard a group of schoolgirls shouting and laughing. One of them 
> yelled;
>
> "He's an idiot you know."
>

Yep I think youve managed to prove them right Id say the certainty was 100% 
without doubt.
date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:29:38 GMT   author:   Terry

Save jobs - sack Ross   
If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
not sack all those employees.

Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
people they can employ!

Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
wanting to listen to him anyway.
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0000   author:   Meee

Re: Save jobs - sack Ross   
Meee wrote:
> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
> not sack all those employees.
> 
> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
> people they can employ!
> 
> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
> wanting to listen to him anyway.

I bet you are a Vine fan.
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:42:24 +0000   author:   dennis@fake dennis@fake

Re: Save jobs - sack Ross   
dennis@fake wrote:

> Meee wrote:
>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>> not sack all those employees.
>> 
>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>> people they can employ!
>> 
>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
> 
> I bet you are a Vine fan.

Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.

-- 
|\  /| ark Fraser  /mfraser@ukgateway.net
| \/ | Somerset   /Using Knode on Kubuntu 7.04
|    |___________/You know what the sig means!
date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:39:21 +0000   author:   Mark Fraser

Re: Save jobs - sack Ross   
Mark Fraser wrote:
> dennis@fake wrote:
> 
>> Meee wrote:
>>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>>> not sack all those employees.
>>>
>>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>>> people they can employ!
>>>
>>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
>> I bet you are a Vine fan.
> 
> Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.
> 
Ok, who do you think is value for money, Brand ?
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:30:24 +0000   author:   dennis@fake dennis@fake

Re: Save jobs - sack Ross   
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:30:24 +0000, "dennis@fake" <dennis@fake> wrote:

>Mark Fraser wrote:
>> dennis@fake wrote:
>> 
>>> Meee wrote:
>>>> If the BBC got rid of Ross and his £6M a year pay packet, they need
>>>> not sack all those employees.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming thet are paid £20K a year, if they get rid of Ross that's 300
>>>> people they can employ!
>>>>
>>>> Lets face it, he's a useless tosspot anyway. While they're at it, they
>>>> could also sack Evans. I can't imagine anyone over the age of 12
>>>> wanting to listen to him anyway.
>>> I bet you are a Vine fan.
>> 
>> Thanks for reminding me, get rid of him too.
>> 
>Ok, who do you think is value for money, Brand ?

How about employing disc jockeys instead of celebrities?  How about
bringing in new talent that cannot demand high wages then not renewing
their contract if they do?
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:42:13 GMT   author:   Scott

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us