What's up with Ed?

We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
impotent?

He tried to give the Oscar Wilde defence (1) but it seems
unconvincing.


1.  No not that one. The one that runs "Either this wallpaper goes or
I do"  (But phrased rather more elegantly I think.)

Mike Ruddock

In message 
, 
mikepedant@live.co.uk writes
>What's up with Ed?
>
>We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
>now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
>believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
>impotent?
>
>He tried to give the Oscar Wilde defence (1) but it seems
>unconvincing.
>
>
>1.  No not that one. The one that runs "Either this wallpaper goes or
>I do"  (But phrased rather more elegantly I think.)
>
>Mike Ruddock

Bugger Bognor?
-- 
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com

"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)

Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>

mikepedant@live.co.uk wrote:
> What's up with Ed?
> 
> We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
> impotent?

I get the impression that Ed has been avoiding intimacy with Fallon ever 
since she got home. Now that he's being put on the spot, it looks as if 
he still can't face it. I don't know that we're meant to assume 
impotence (it was a bit early in the proceedings to assume that all was 
lost, wasn't it?) - I just thought he didn't want to confront Fallon in 
an intimate situation because it would be difficult not  to reveal that 
his feelings had changed.
-- 
Marjorie

To reply, replace dontusethisaddress with marje

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:11:55 +0100, Marjorie
 wrote:

>mikepedant@live.co.uk wrote:
>> What's up with Ed?
>> 
>> We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
>> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
>> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
>> impotent?
>
>I get the impression that Ed has been avoiding intimacy with Fallon ever 
>since she got home. Now that he's being put on the spot, it looks as if 
>he still can't face it. I don't know that we're meant to assume 
>impotence (it was a bit early in the proceedings to assume that all was 
>lost, wasn't it?) - I just thought he didn't want to confront Fallon in 
>an intimate situation because it would be difficult not  to reveal that 
>his feelings had changed.

Is this going to be new, improved version of the 'let's go out to
dinner in a posh restaurant so that I can dump you' scenario?

-- 
al
LSM
Licensed to flame

On 4 Jul, 09:50, Al Menzies  wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:11:55 퍝, Marjorie
>
>
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >mikeped...@live.co.uk wrote:
> >> What's up with Ed?
>
> >> We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
> >> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
> >> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
> >> impotent?
>
> >I get the impression that Ed has been avoiding intimacy with Fallon ever
> >since she got home. Now that he's being put on the spot, it looks as if
> >he still can't face it. I don't know that we're meant to assume
> >impotence (it was a bit early in the proceedings to assume that all was
> >lost, wasn't it?) - I just thought he didn't want to confront Fallon in
> >an intimate situation because it would be difficult not  to reveal that
> >his feelings had changed.

Ah ! Rodeo sex: just whisper "Oh Em!" and see how long he can stay on.

> Is this going to be new, improved version of the 'let's go out to
> dinner in a posh restaurant so that I can dump you' scenario?

New improved?
Lets go down to the bar and get some pints in.

On Jul 3, 8:51 pm, mikeped...@live.co.uk wrote:
> What's up with Ed?
>
> We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
> impotent?

Maybe he's been to see "Teeth". (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780622/)

(Does he also have Betty Davis knees?)

On 3 Jul, 19:57, Mike McMillan  wrote:
> In message
> ,
> mikeped...@live.co.uk writes
>
> >What's up with Ed?
>
> >We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
> >now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
> >believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
> >impotent?
>
> >He tried to give the Oscar Wilde defence (1) but it seems
> >unconvincing.
>
> >1.  No not that one. The one that runs "Either this wallpaper goes or
> >I do"  (But phrased rather more elegantly I think.)
>
> >Mike Ruddock
>
> Bugger Bognor?
What's Bognor done to upset you?

Liz

In message <6Y-dnZAYs9rXQfDVnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet>, Marjorie 
 writes
>mikepedant@live.co.uk wrote:
>> What's up with Ed?
>>  We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of 
>>weeks
>> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
>> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
>> impotent?
>
>I get the impression that Ed has been avoiding intimacy with Fallon 
>ever since she got home. Now that he's being put on the spot, it looks 
>as if he still can't face it. I don't know that we're meant to assume 
>impotence (it was a bit early in the proceedings to assume that all was 
>lost, wasn't it?) - I just thought he didn't want to confront Fallon in 
>an intimate situation because it would be difficult not  to reveal that 
>his feelings had changed.

Well I don't think that Ed can rise to the occasion, in fact I don't 
think he can stand up to Fallon at all at present. When Fallon asks if 
something has come between them - Ed will look down and reply 'Err, ... 
no - nothing at all.

Toodle Droop,

Mike
-- 
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com

"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)

Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:19:50 -0700 (PDT), Bob E
 wrote:

>On 4 Jul, 09:50, Al Menzies  wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:11:55 +0100, Marjorie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >mikeped...@live.co.uk wrote:
>> >> What's up with Ed?
>>
>> >> We gather (we have had it bashed about our heads for a couple of weeks
>> >> now) that Ed is still mooning over Emma, but are we expected to
>> >> believe that his feelings fir her are so intense that they render him
>> >> impotent?
>>
>> >I get the impression that Ed has been avoiding intimacy with Fallon ever
>> >since she got home. Now that he's being put on the spot, it looks as if
>> >he still can't face it. I don't know that we're meant to assume
>> >impotence (it was a bit early in the proceedings to assume that all was
>> >lost, wasn't it?) - I just thought he didn't want to confront Fallon in
>> >an intimate situation because it would be difficult not  to reveal that
>> >his feelings had changed.
>
>Ah ! Rodeo sex: just whisper "Oh Em!" and see how long he can stay on.
>
>> Is this going to be new, improved version of the 'let's go out to
>> dinner in a posh restaurant so that I can dump you' scenario?
>
>New improved?
>Lets go down to the bar and get some pints in.

Bob! YAthisweek'sscriptwriterAICM£5

Nick O
-- 
real e-mail is nickodell (at) bigfoot (dot) com

In article <xA2VowEoGnbIFAF5@mike.mcmillan>, tinned.spam@ntlworld.com 
says...
> 
> Well I don't think that Ed can rise to the occasion, in fact I don't 
> think he can stand up to Fallon at all at present. When Fallon asks if 
> something has come between them - Ed will look down and reply 'Err, ... 
> no - nothing at all.
> 
Will he proffer some limp excuse?

-- 
Sam

In message 
, Bob 
E  writes
[]
>Ah ! Rodeo sex: just whisper "Oh Em!" and see how long he can stay on.
[]
Wasn't that "Ohh, Eth ..." - oh no, different series (and no, I'm not 
_really_ that old, just heard the repeats. Was always said with feeling, 
though ...)
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **

"Mummy, Mummy, I'm 13 now can I wear a bra?"

"SHUT UP RALPH...."