|
|
|
date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100,
group: uk.media.radio.archers
back
chocolate ...
I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
Two things.
Firstly, when I finally sold my Essex home, I wasn't going to splash out
- it's not in my nature - but someone here (YKWYA!) suggested maybe some
nice high-solids choccie. So I thought I'd try one of these expensive
ones after all - I bought a bar of 86%. After some days of it sitting in
my 'fridge looking at me (I never feeling it was a special enough
occasion), I finally got round to breaking off a bit - and I'm afraid I
found it far too bitter for my taste. I'm happy that others enjoy it;
however, it just drove me back to my Tesco's own brand (their white with
crunchy strawberry pieces I particularly like!).
Secondly, while browsing the firebox site, I came across what my brother
calls an ISTATOY: "I saw this and thought of you".
http://www.firebox.com/product/1818/Chococlock is a clock, which, on the
hour, delivers a piece of chocolate! (Or whatever you've loaded it
with.) It has dark sensors so it doesn't feed at night, and also a cheat
("feed me NOW!") button.
(They also have a rather tempting alarm clock which has Stephen Fry's
dulcet tones, rather than a bell or buzzer, which I'm tempted by, but
[a] it's rather expensive, and [b] like may things would be better
shared, and I live alone.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
The hills were worn down by eroticism. - G4PKP's bienapropism list
date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
> I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
Funny you should say that... I've just seen this lot:
http://www.demarquette.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=8
mentioned in the Torygraph, and suspect it might be of interest to
umrats. Not being a chocaholic I've not tried this one myself, but the
paper rates them highly (no idea what their advertising budget is, mind
you!) ;o) Does look interesting. If anybody goes for it, report back!
Kimbo xx
--
www.bykimbo.com
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:46:03 +0100
author: Kim Andrews
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote:
>I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
>
>Two things.
>
>Firstly, when I finally sold my Essex home, I wasn't going to splash out
>- it's not in my nature - but someone here (YKWYA!) suggested maybe some
>nice high-solids choccie. So I thought I'd try one of these expensive
>ones after all - I bought a bar of 86%. After some days of it sitting in
>my 'fridge looking at me (I never feeling it was a special enough
>occasion), I finally got round to breaking off a bit - and I'm afraid I
>found it far too bitter for my taste. I'm happy that others enjoy it;
>however, it just drove me back to my Tesco's own brand (their white with
>crunchy strawberry pieces I particularly like!).
>
>Secondly, while browsing the firebox site, I came across what my brother
>calls an ISTATOY: "I saw this and thought of you".
>http://www.firebox.com/product/1818/Chococlock is a clock, which, on the
>hour, delivers a piece of chocolate! (Or whatever you've loaded it
>with.) It has dark sensors so it doesn't feed at night, and also a cheat
>("feed me NOW!") button.
>
>(They also have a rather tempting alarm clock which has Stephen Fry's
>dulcet tones, rather than a bell or buzzer, which I'm tempted by, but
>[a] it's rather expensive, and [b] like may things would be better
>shared, and I live alone.)
I think I read this week, or maybe heard, of another health benefit
from eating a little chocolate daily. I wish I could remember what it
was. This could have been anywhere in Spain, the UK or on the flight
:)
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:44:47 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:46:03 +0100, Kim Andrews
wrote:
>J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>> I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
>
>Funny you should say that... I've just seen this lot:
>http://www.demarquette.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=8
>mentioned in the Torygraph, and suspect it might be of interest to
>umrats. Not being a chocaholic I've not tried this one myself, but the
>paper rates them highly (no idea what their advertising budget is, mind
>you!) ;o) Does look interesting. If anybody goes for it, report back!
>
>
>Kimbo xx
Oh in the last couple of days I have heard or read of plans to make
even better chocolate. It was some discovery or new method. I should
keep a notebook with me for chocolate related information so that I
don't forget it. I could in fact write down other stuff I'd like to
tell umra that I will forget before I get a tuit.
Aanother bought me a nice big diary/notebook in attractive design to
write down Important Things that I have done or dates of things I need
to remember, so I no longer say 'did I sort that out?' or 'I am sure i
sent a form off about that.' but I forget to write things down.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:48:02 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
On 27 Jun, 23:51, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote:
> I thought I'd try one of these expensive
> ones after all - I bought a bar of 86%. After some days of it sitting in
> my 'fridge looking at me (I never feeling it was a special enough
> occasion), I finally got round to breaking off a bit
er ?
How do you do that?
buy chocolate
eat chocolate
Where does the fridge come into it and was does "breaking off a bit"
mean?
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
author: Bob E
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote:
>I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
>
>Two things.
>
>Firstly, when I finally sold my Essex home, I wasn't going to splash out
>- it's not in my nature - but someone here (YKWYA!) suggested maybe some
>nice high-solids choccie. So I thought I'd try one of these expensive
>ones after all - I bought a bar of 86%. After some days of it sitting in
>my 'fridge looking at me (I never feeling it was a special enough
>occasion), I finally got round to breaking off a bit - and I'm afraid I
>found it far too bitter for my taste. I'm happy that others enjoy it;
>however, it just drove me back to my Tesco's own brand (their white with
>crunchy strawberry pieces I particularly like!).
If you like white with strawberry pieces it was a fairly safe
conclusion that you wouldn't like the 86%, sadly. Is it a good idea to
keep chocolate in the fridge? IME [1] it develops an unattractive
bloom, and dark chocolate becomes, possibly temporarily if one were
prepared to wait, rather dry in texture.
>Secondly, while browsing the firebox site, I came across what my brother
>calls an ISTATOY: "I saw this and thought of you".
>http://www.firebox.com/product/1818/Chococlock is a clock, which, on the
>hour, delivers a piece of chocolate! (Or whatever you've loaded it
>with.) It has dark sensors so it doesn't feed at night, and also a cheat
>("feed me NOW!") button.
Now that I could use!
>
>(They also have a rather tempting alarm clock which has Stephen Fry's
>dulcet tones, rather than a bell or buzzer, which I'm tempted by, but
>[a] it's rather expensive, and [b] like may things would be better
>shared, and I live alone.)
Too dulcet, it might not wake me, at least not after the first
morning. I like my Voice Alarm, which shuts up for 9 mins when I groan
at it.
--
Jo
[1] Of giving it up for Lent but storing it in the fridge for Easter
Sunday - yes, I know that's cheating.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:06:13 +0200
author: Jo Lonergan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message
, Bob
E writes
[]
>> occasion), I finally got round to breaking off a bit
>
>er ?
>
>How do you do that?
>
>buy chocolate
>eat chocolate
>
>Where does the fridge come into it and was does "breaking off a bit"
>mean?
Well, these days, I tend to buy more than one 200g bar at a time, and
I'd not do myself any favours ... (actually, I do manage not to eat it
too fast, though I do tend to break off a row at a time, and eat all of
it, not just one square ...)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
The hills were worn down by eroticism. - G4PKP's bienapropism list
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:55:00 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Jo Lonergan
writes
[]
>If you like white with strawberry pieces it was a fairly safe
Don't dismiss me as a total boor (I know you weren't really) - I do like
plain dark as well, in fact on the whole I prefer either plain or white
to milk. (The standard fillings, such as fruit and nut, tend to be only
in the milk though - though one of the supermarkets does do dark with
fillings.)
(Aside: I've wondered for decades - why can you have: fruit [raisins]
and nut; nut only; but not fruit only? In the standard ranges, anyway.)
>conclusion that you wouldn't like the 86%, sadly. Is it a good idea to
>keep chocolate in the fridge? IME [1] it develops an unattractive
I haven't found it so; it doesn't stay there _that_ long (I doubt a bar
remains longer than a week for me). Also, especially this time of year,
I'm not sure it'd be too good an idea _not_ to keep it in the 'fridge
either; certainly I can't keep butter out. (I don't have any air
conditioning other than opening windows.)
>bloom, and dark chocolate becomes, possibly temporarily if one were
>prepared to wait, rather dry in texture.
The 86% did seem surprisingly hard for its thickness.
>
>>Secondly, while browsing the firebox site, I came across what my brother
>>calls an ISTATOY: "I saw this and thought of you".
>>http://www.firebox.com/product/1818/Chococlock is a clock, which, on the
>>hour, delivers a piece of chocolate! (Or whatever you've loaded it
>>with.) It has dark sensors so it doesn't feed at night, and also a cheat
>>("feed me NOW!") button.
>
>Now that I could use!
It's about 19 or 20 quid.
>>
>>(They also have a rather tempting alarm clock which has Stephen Fry's
>>dulcet tones, rather than a bell or buzzer, which I'm tempted by, but
>>[a] it's rather expensive, and [b] like may things would be better
>>shared, and I live alone.)
>
>Too dulcet, it might not wake me, at least not after the first
>morning. I like my Voice Alarm, which shuts up for 9 mins when I groan
>at it.
>
Oh, it (http://www.firebox.com/product/1830/Voco-Alarm-Clock) starts
with gentle birdsong, then a discreet cough, then "good morning, sir"
(they do a madam version!), then one of a selection of 50 or 200
messages, and finally a beeping alarm until you press the button, at
which point it says 'Ghastly noise, I agree, Sir.' It sounds a
well-thought-out product - just a wee bit on the expensive side. It's a
clock with hands, in a Palladian case (pillars and a pediment), which is
wooden in the more expensive version.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
The hills were worn down by eroticism. - G4PKP's bienapropism list
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:08:50 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Kim Andrews
writes
>J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>> I haven't seen any chocolate mentioned here for a while!
>
>If anybody goes for it, report back!
>
Only if they win on the Lottery or ERNIE. Or they've got a rich sugar
daddy. That's seriously expensive!
Sincerely Chris
>
>Kimbo xx
--
Chris McMillan
http://www.chinavision.org.uk/
http://www.oneplusone.org.cn
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:28:34 +0100
author: chris mcmillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Jo Lonergan
writes
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
> wrote:
>
> Is it a good idea to
>keep chocolate in the fridge?
>
No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
Sincerely Chris
--
Chris McMillan
http://www.chinavision.org.uk/
http://www.oneplusone.org.cn
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:30:34 +0100
author: chris mcmillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
chris mcmillan wrote:
> In message , Jo Lonergan
> writes
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is it a good idea to
>> keep chocolate in the fridge?
> >
> No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
>
> Sincerely Chris
>
A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a new
chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:30:27 +0100
author: dennis@fake dennis@fake
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:30:27 +0100, "dennis@fake" <dennis@fake> wrote:
>chris mcmillan wrote:
>> In message , Jo Lonergan
>> writes
>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it a good idea to
>>> keep chocolate in the fridge?
>> >
>> No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
>
>A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a new
>chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
Chocolate has always been a key ingredient in Mole, the Mexican chili
dish (no mouldiwarps have been harmed in its production), so chocolate
curry sounds eminently edible.
As long as its not curried mouldiwarp, of course.
--
Stephen
Into my heart an air that kills From yon far country blows:
What are those blue remembered hills, What spires, what farms are those?
That is the land of lost content, I see it shining plain,
The happy highways where I went And cannot come again.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:09:41 +0100
author: Stephen
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:08:50 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote:
>In message , Jo Lonergan
> writes
>[]
>>If you like white with strawberry pieces it was a fairly safe
>
>Don't dismiss me as a total boor (I know you weren't really)
Really not - de gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum!
>- I do like
>plain dark as well, in fact on the whole I prefer either plain or white
>to milk. (The standard fillings, such as fruit and nut, tend to be only
>in the milk though - though one of the supermarkets does do dark with
>fillings.)
I find milk chocolate tends to be a bit too sweet/much too sweet, but
white, while it can be pleasant, doesn't taste much like chocolate at
all.
>
>(Aside: I've wondered for decades - why can you have: fruit [raisins]
>and nut; nut only; but not fruit only? In the standard ranges, anyway.)
You can have raisins with rum (which is very nice). And why is
chocolate with ginger pieces in it almost always black?
<snip>
>
>Oh, it (http://www.firebox.com/product/1830/Voco-Alarm-Clock) starts
>with gentle birdsong, then a discreet cough, then "good morning, sir"
>(they do a madam version!), then one of a selection of 50 or 200
>messages, and finally a beeping alarm until you press the button, at
>which point it says 'Ghastly noise, I agree, Sir.' It sounds a
>well-thought-out product - just a wee bit on the expensive side. It's a
>clock with hands, in a Palladian case (pillars and a pediment), which is
>wooden in the more expensive version.
An extra GBP 10 for the women's version? Shirley not legal!
--
Jo
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:15:23 +0200
author: Jo Lonergan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Jo Lonergan
writes
>On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:08:50 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
> wrote:
[]
>I find milk chocolate tends to be a bit too sweet/much too sweet, but
>white, while it can be pleasant, doesn't taste much like chocolate at
>all.
Yes, I've never been sure whether it is actually chocolate; I guess it's
a matter of how you define chocolate, which I know is different between
UK and some other countries.
>>
>>(Aside: I've wondered for decades - why can you have: fruit [raisins]
>>and nut; nut only; but not fruit only? In the standard ranges, anyway.)
>
>You can have raisins with rum (which is very nice). And why is
Not in the standard own-brand (or even Cadbury's etc. basic) ranges.
[]
>>Oh, it (http://www.firebox.com/product/1830/Voco-Alarm-Clock) starts
>>with gentle birdsong, then a discreet cough, then "good morning, sir"
>>(they do a madam version!), then one of a selection of 50 or 200
[]
>An extra GBP 10 for the women's version? Shirley not legal!
>
Hmm, interesting illegal-Shirley point! It's not _quite_ an extra tenner
for the women's version, it's for the "de luxe" (wooden rather than
plastic case, more stored phrases, and something) version. However, they
only do the "madam" version _in_ the deluxe version - so it's an
interesting point!
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
"... there were certain words you couldn't say in front of a girl. Now you can
say all of them - but you can't say girl!" Tom Lehrer on BBC Radio 4, September
1998.
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:19:09 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Stephen
writes
[]
>Chocolate has always been a key ingredient in Mole, the Mexican chili
>dish (no mouldiwarps have been harmed in its production), so chocolate
>curry sounds eminently edible.
>
>As long as its not curried mouldiwarp, of course.
My mother used to put cocoa in as an ingredient in something that would
normally think of as savoury (I think it might have been a curry; IIR,
I'll ask brother who is more into cooking than I).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
"... there were certain words you couldn't say in front of a girl. Now you can
say all of them - but you can't say girl!" Tom Lehrer on BBC Radio 4, September
1998.
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:20:21 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
dennis@fake wrote...
>chris mcmillan wrote:
>> In message , Jo Lonergan
>> writes
>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it a good idea to
>>> keep chocolate in the fridge?
>> >
>> No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
>> Sincerely Chris
>>
>A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a
>new chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
I mentioned in Another Place that, around Valentine's Day, I purchased
from Morrisons some chocolate flavoured cheese.
--
Martin
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:59:38 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:59:38 +0100, Martin Clark wrote:
>dennis@fake wrote...
>>chris mcmillan wrote:
>>> In message , Jo Lonergan
>>> writes
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is it a good idea to
>>>> keep chocolate in the fridge?
>>> >
>>> No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
>>> Sincerely Chris
>>>
>>A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a
>>new chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
>
>I mentioned in Another Place that, around Valentine's Day, I purchased
>from Morrisons some chocolate flavoured cheese.
That does not sound like a good use of either ingredient.
At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
--
Stephen
Into my heart an air that kills From yon far country blows:
What are those blue remembered hills, What spires, what farms are those?
That is the land of lost content, I see it shining plain,
The happy highways where I went And cannot come again.
date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:36:54 +0100
author: Stephen
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Stephen
writes
>On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:59:38 +0100, Martin Clark wrote:
>
>>dennis@fake wrote...
>>>chris mcmillan wrote:
>>>> In message , Jo Lonergan
>>>> writes
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:51:54 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it a good idea to
>>>>> keep chocolate in the fridge?
>>>> >
>>>> No idea if its a good idea but its one we've always used.
>>>> Sincerely Chris
>>>>
>>>A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a
>>>new chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
>>
>>I mentioned in Another Place that, around Valentine's Day, I purchased
>>from Morrisons some chocolate flavoured cheese.
>
>That does not sound like a good use of either ingredient.
>
Too right. But I might still have been very tempted - of course I am
not allowed full fat anything.
>
>At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
That was just a waste of perfectly good marmite. How could you taste
*anything* over the salt content anyway?
Sincerely Chris
--
Chris McMillan
http://www.chinavision.org.uk/
http://www.oneplusone.org.cn
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:15:51 +0100
author: chris mcmillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
chris mcmillan wrote...
> writes
>>On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:59:38 +0100, Martin Clark wrote:
>>>dennis@fake wrote...
>>>>>
>>>>A local Indian Restaurant has had a lot of publicity this week for a
>>>>new chocolate curry on it's menu. Any one fancy it ?
>>>
>>>I mentioned in Another Place that, around Valentine's Day, I purchased
>>>from Morrisons some chocolate flavoured cheese.
>>
>>That does not sound like a good use of either ingredient.
>>
>Too right. But I might still have been very tempted - of course I am
>not allowed full fat anything.
I was tempted, and, IMO, it was a very good use of both ingredients.
Unfortunately, I have now been banned from eating cheese, so I won't
have to have any further Pythonesque conversations with the proprietor
of the Stalybridge cheese shop.
--
Martin
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 21:49:57 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:15:51 +0100, chris mcmillan wrote:
>>At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
>
>That was just a waste of perfectly good marmite. How could you taste
>*anything* over the salt content anyway?
There is a difference, IME, between Marmite with salted or unsalted butter. It
took me quite a while to get used to it when I moved to a land of unsalted.
One of my bothers had some Guinness flavoured Marmite, which he said tasted
exactly like the usual kind. Champagne would have even less chance against the
prevailing marmiteness.
--
Jo
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:56:53 +0200
author: Jo Lonergan
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:56:53 +0200, Jo Lonergan
wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:15:51 +0100, chris mcmillan wrote:
>
>
>>>At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
>>
>>That was just a waste of perfectly good marmite. How could you taste
>>*anything* over the salt content anyway?
>
>There is a difference, IME, between Marmite with salted or unsalted butter. It
>took me quite a while to get used to it when I moved to a land of unsalted.
>
>One of my bothers had some Guinness flavoured Marmite, which he said tasted
>exactly like the usual kind. Champagne would have even less chance against the
>prevailing marmiteness.
I love unsalted butter. On bread, with jam, preferably a good jam,
not Weightwatchers one....*sigh*
But I love more that I just bought a size 10 dress and can't stop
going shopping to try things on :)
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:29:10 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , badriya
writes
>preferably a good jam, not Weightwatchers one...
IANA cook or a dietician, but I thought the only way to make jam was to
mix fruit and sugar in fairly precise proportions. Presumably WW do not
object too much to fruit, but frown on sugar. So how is WW jam made?
--
Jenny
"I always like to have the morning well-aired before I get up."
(Beau Brummel, 1778-1840)
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:40:59 +0100
author: Jenny M Benson
|
Re: chocolate ...
Jenny M Benson wrote:
> In message , badriya
> writes
>> preferably a good jam, not Weightwatchers one...
>
> IANA cook or a dietician, but I thought the only way to make jam was to
> mix fruit and sugar in fairly precise proportions. Presumably WW do not
> object too much to fruit, but frown on sugar. So how is WW jam made?
I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep those
"jams" in the fridge, as you do with "Extra" jams and as I have had to
with one or two too lightly set ones of my own [1], so I imagine they
use much less sugar. It's possible they use something like gelatine
too, but I am only guessing.
--
Jane
The potter in the purple socks
http://www.clothandclay.co.uk/umra/cookbook/contents.htm for recipes
supplied by umrats
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:41:59 +0100
author: Jane Vernon
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:40:59 +0100, Jenny M Benson
wrote:
>In message , badriya
> writes
>>preferably a good jam, not Weightwatchers one...
>
>IANA cook or a dietician, but I thought the only way to make jam was to
>mix fruit and sugar in fairly precise proportions. Presumably WW do not
>object too much to fruit, but frown on sugar. So how is WW jam made?
Er..they are called spreads. There is lemon, blackcurrant and I think
apple..or maybe that was the Spanish low sugar one. This blackcurrant
says
water, blackcurrants, sugar,acidity regulatos,citric acid,sodium
citrates,gelling agent, pectins,stabiliser,guar
gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
26.2g of sugar per 100g,it says
normal jam has a minimum of 60g per 100g
It is sort of thin and jellied. Less jammy but quite nice and better
than no jam. It's nice on ryvita with low fat cream cheese, or on
rice cakes.
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:33:37 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
badriya wrote:
>
> gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
> chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
--
Kimbo xx
www.booksbykimbo.com
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:54:31 +0100
author: Kim Andrews
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:56:53 +0200, Jo Lonergan
wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:15:51 +0100, chris mcmillan wrote:
>
>
>>>At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
>>
>>That was just a waste of perfectly good marmite. How could you taste
>>*anything* over the salt content anyway?
>
>There is a difference, IME, between Marmite with salted or unsalted butter. It
>took me quite a while to get used to it when I moved to a land of unsalted.
>
>One of my bothers had some Guinness flavoured Marmite, which he said tasted
>exactly like the usual kind. Champagne would have even less chance against the
>prevailing marmiteness.
I tried the Guinness version and I agree with bother - it tasted
indistinguishable from the regular stuff. The champagne version is
distinctive though - it's more in the smell than the taste, but there
is a definite champagne-style yeastiness in the bouquet which raises
it well above the ordinary. Next time you're in the Cheltenham area
you should drop by and try some.
--
Stephen
Into my heart an air that kills From yon far country blows:
What are those blue remembered hills, What spires, what farms are those?
That is the land of lost content, I see it shining plain,
The happy highways where I went And cannot come again.
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:25:32 +0100
author: Stephen
|
Re: chocolate ...
In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
says...
> badriya wrote:
> >
> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>
> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>
"Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
--
Sam
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:17:53 +0100
author: Plusnet
|
Re: chocolate ...
In article , Jane Vernon
wrote:
> I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep those
> "jams" in the fridge,
What is the 'use by' date like: if it's low-sugar, I would expect it to have
quite a short shelf-life.
Rosemary
--
Rosemary Miskin ZFC Pm miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk
Loughborough, UK http://miskin.orpheusweb.co.uk
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:27:51 +0100
author: Rosemary Miskin
|
Re: chocolate ...
Plusnet wrote...
>In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>says...
>> badriya wrote:
>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>
>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>
>"Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>
You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 00:00:51 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:27:51 +0100, Rosemary Miskin
wrote:
>In article , Jane Vernon
> wrote:
>> I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep those
>> "jams" in the fridge,
>
>What is the 'use by' date like: if it's low-sugar, I would expect it to have
>quite a short shelf-life.
>
>Rosemary
I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
Katharine Whitehorn said
What goes through one fat white mother won't help the starving
children in China. The dogs are a big help now. The hens were too
when I had them.
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:47:58 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , badriya
writes
[]
>I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
>too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
>at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
>dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
>many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
>doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
>which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
[]
Well, I don't know if it is generational, but if so it can certainly be
inherited; my mother was careful (e. g. with things like brown paper),
and has either said or I picked up on that such behaviour was learnt in
times of austerity; however, I think I had a happy childhood and have
never really been short enough that it would make that much difference,
but I still am careful (or mean) with things: sealed packs of bacon, for
example, I let go months past the date (I do keep them in the 'fridge),
and, like you, do have some stuff that's very old which I have no
intention of discarding.
I think some things only have sell-by dates because customer pressure
(and possibly the company lawyers) insist they be put on: long-life milk
_might_ be such a case, and I'm certain things like noodles are. (Plus
of course it does force _some_ people to discard - and thus buy again -
things which are perfectly all right.)
(I run my printer almost entirely on junk mail - why do so many
companies still not use double-sided printers?; some of it is
nice-quality paper, too.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL(+++)IS-P--Ch+(p)Ar+T[?]H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for thoughts on PCs. **
Buying books would be a good thing if one could also buy the time to read them
in: but as a rule the purchase of books is mistaken for the appropriation of
their contents. -Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher (1788-1860)
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:13:35 +0100
author: J. P. Gilliver (John)
|
Re: chocolate ...
Martin Clark wrote:
> Plusnet wrote...
>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>> says...
>>> badriya wrote:
>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>
>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>
>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>
> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:23:04 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
badriya wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:27:51 +0100, Rosemary Miskin
> wrote:
>
>> In article , Jane Vernon
>> wrote:
>>> I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep those
>>> "jams" in the fridge,
>> What is the 'use by' date like: if it's low-sugar, I would expect it to have
>> quite a short shelf-life.
>>
>> Rosemary
> I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
> too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
> at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
> dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
> many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
> doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
I reckon that young adults have never seen food which is rotten, and so
rely solely on the use-by date. They seem to think that some magic
process happens at midnight on the appointed day, after which the food
becomes toxic.
We saw a Dispatches programme this week which showed a young couple who
were throwing away *one third* of the food they bought each week. The
programme showed them what they could have done with all that food from
just one week's bin, but it missed the opportunity to explore why they
thought they had to throw away a huge bag of spuds which looked brand
new, whole pizzas still in the box, etc, and why they didn't freeze the
half packets of sausage and mince after they'd used the first half.
I still shudder at the memory of Hugh F-W's chicken programme where he
discovered with horror that families bought whole chickens, roasted
them, ate the breasts and then threw out what remained. We can get 10
meals out of a large chicken.
--
David
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:40:16 GMT
author: the Omrud
|
Re: chocolate ...
BrritSki wrote...
>Martin Clark wrote:
>> Plusnet wrote...
>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>> says...
>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>
>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>
>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>
>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>
>Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:38:29 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
Martin Clark wrote:
> BrritSki wrote...
>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>
>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>
>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>
>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>
>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>
> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
I thought that would get someone steaming.
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:35:12 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
the Omrud wrote:
> badriya wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:27:51 +0100, Rosemary Miskin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article , Jane Vernon
>>> wrote:
>>>> I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep
>>>> those "jams" in the fridge,
>>> What is the 'use by' date like: if it's low-sugar, I would expect it
>>> to have
>>> quite a short shelf-life.
>>>
>>> Rosemary
>> I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
>> too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
>> at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
>> dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
>> many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
>> doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
>> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
>
> I reckon that young adults have never seen food which is rotten, and so
> rely solely on the use-by date. They seem to think that some magic
> process happens at midnight on the appointed day, after which the food
> becomes toxic.
>
> We saw a Dispatches programme this week which showed a young couple who
> were throwing away *one third* of the food they bought each week. The
> programme showed them what they could have done with all that food from
> just one week's bin, but it missed the opportunity to explore why they
> thought they had to throw away a huge bag of spuds which looked brand
> new, whole pizzas still in the box, etc, and why they didn't freeze the
> half packets of sausage and mince after they'd used the first half.
>
> I still shudder at the memory of Hugh F-W's chicken programme where he
> discovered with horror that families bought whole chickens, roasted
> them, ate the breasts and then threw out what remained. We can get 10
> meals out of a large chicken.
>
If you're saying 10 portions I would agree. Even with the little
spit-roasted chickens (that waife has just cycled off to the village to
buy), we get 2 portions hot (lunch today), 2 huge sandwiches tomorrow
and then the carcase goes into the stock pot is concentrated and frozen
and becomes the basis of soup or gravy.
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:38:18 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
BrritSki wrote...
>Martin Clark wrote:
>> BrritSki wrote...
>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>
>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>
>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>
>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>
>I thought that would get someone steaming.
I can see you're on a roll now!
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:37:45 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
Martin Clark wrote:
> BrritSki wrote...
>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming
>>>>>>> agent,calcium
>>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>>
>>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>> I thought that would get someone steaming.
> I can see you're on a roll now!
You've got me plumb...
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:56:04 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
BrritSki wrote...
>Martin Clark wrote:
>> BrritSki wrote...
>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming
>>>>>>>> agent,calcium
>>>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>>>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>>> I thought that would get someone steaming.
>> I can see you're on a roll now!
>
>You've got me plumb...
Everyone will flock to see that.
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:24:25 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
Martin Clark wrote:
> BrritSki wrote...
>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming
>>>>>>>>> agent,calcium
>>>>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>>>>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>>>> I thought that would get someone steaming.
>>> I can see you're on a roll now!
>> You've got me plumb...
> Everyone will flock to see that.
Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost and
silent partner, sister Ana.
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:17:08 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
BrritSki wrote...
>Martin Clark wrote:
>> BrritSki wrote...
>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming
>>>>>>>>>> agent,calcium
>>>>>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>>>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>>>>>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>>>>> I thought that would get someone steaming.
>>>> I can see you're on a roll now!
>>> You've got me plumb...
>> Everyone will flock to see that.
>
>Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost and
>silent partner, sister Ana.
I can't crown that!
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:31:07 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
BrritSki wrote:
> Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost and
> silent partner, sister Ana.
<branches off>
Oh I know them, they live next-door to Mr & Mrs Ladder, don't they? Of
course, it's her second marriage, so her son is only a step-Ladder.
He's a nice boy though, going out with the Ulshions youngest, Em.
And of course, her Dad's worth a bob or two. Though to be honest, most
of it's tied up in property. He's really just a paper-millionaire.
--
Kimbo xx
www.booksbykimbo.com
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:36:42 +0100
author: Kim Andrews
|
Re: chocolate ...
Kim Andrews wrote...
>BrritSki wrote:
>
>> Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost
>>and silent partner, sister Ana.
><branches off>
>
>Oh I know them, they live next-door to Mr & Mrs Ladder, don't they? Of
>course, it's her second marriage, so her son is only a step-Ladder.
>
>He's a nice boy though, going out with the Ulshions youngest, Em.
>
>And of course, her Dad's worth a bob or two. Though to be honest, most
>of it's tied up in property. He's really just a paper-millionaire.
>
I forgot to ask BrritSki what he does with his wallpaper. Does he get a
decorator in or does he stick it up himself? :o
--
Martin
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:15:33 +0100
author: Martin Clark
|
Re: chocolate ...
Martin Clark wrote:
> Kim Andrews wrote...
>> BrritSki wrote:
>>
>>> Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost
>>> and silent partner, sister Ana.
>> <branches off>
>>
>> Oh I know them, they live next-door to Mr & Mrs Ladder, don't they? Of
>> course, it's her second marriage, so her son is only a step-Ladder.
>>
>> He's a nice boy though, going out with the Ulshions youngest, Em.
>>
>> And of course, her Dad's worth a bob or two. Though to be honest, most
>> of it's tied up in property. He's really just a paper-millionaire.
>>
> I forgot to ask BrritSki what he does with his wallpaper. Does he get a
> decorator in or does he stick it up himself? :o
I think he just tosses it onto the paste table and hopes for the best.
Sometimes it goes up okay, some times it comes off in his hand.
--
Kimbo xx
www.booksbykimbo.com
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:25:37 +0100
author: Kim Andrews
|
Re: chocolate ...
Kim Andrews wrote:
> Martin Clark wrote:
>> Kim Andrews wrote...
>>> BrritSki wrote:
>>>
>>>> Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost
>>>> and silent partner, sister Ana.
>>> <branches off>
>>>
>>> Oh I know them, they live next-door to Mr & Mrs Ladder, don't they?
>>> Of course, it's her second marriage, so her son is only a step-Ladder.
>>>
>>> He's a nice boy though, going out with the Ulshions youngest, Em.
>>>
>>> And of course, her Dad's worth a bob or two. Though to be honest,
>>> most of it's tied up in property. He's really just a paper-millionaire.
>>>
>> I forgot to ask BrritSki what he does with his wallpaper. Does he get
>> a decorator in or does he stick it up himself? :o
>
> I think he just tosses it onto the paste table and hopes for the best.
> Sometimes it goes up okay, some times it comes off in his hand.
>
>
YASamanthaAICM5points
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:50:22 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message <An%ak.19881$E41.6239@text.news.virginmedia.com>, the Omrud
writes
>badriya wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:27:51 +0100, Rosemary Miskin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article , Jane Vernon
>>> wrote:
>>>> I can't strictly answer how WW do it, but I know you have to keep
>>>>those "jams" in the fridge,
>>> What is the 'use by' date like: if it's low-sugar, I would expect it to have
>>> quite a short shelf-life.
>>>
>>> Rosemary
>> I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
>> too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
>> at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
>> dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
>> many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
>> doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
>> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
>
>I reckon that young adults have never seen food which is rotten, and so
>rely solely on the use-by date. They seem to think that some magic
>process happens at midnight on the appointed day, after which the food
>becomes toxic.
>
>We saw a Dispatches programme this week which showed a young couple who
>were throwing away *one third* of the food they bought each week. The
>programme showed them what they could have done with all that food from
>just one week's bin, but it missed the opportunity to explore why they
>thought they had to throw away a huge bag of spuds which looked brand
>new, whole pizzas still in the box, etc, and why they didn't freeze the
>half packets of sausage and mince after they'd used the first half.
>
>I still shudder at the memory of Hugh F-W's chicken programme where he
>discovered with horror that families bought whole chickens, roasted
>them, ate the breasts and then threw out what remained. We can get 10
>meals out of a large chicken.
>
Psshaaw, we had to march ten miles, run a further twenty to catch the
chicken... and then we were expected to get twenty meals out of just the
tail feathers alone ... ;-)
--
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com
"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)
Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:34:34 +0100
author: Mike McMillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message <n7xdKtAFAJbIFwUQ@oooah.noooah>, Martin Clark
writes
>BrritSki wrote...
>>Martin Clark wrote:
>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>
>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>
>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>
>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>
>>Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>
>Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
OK you two, frieze ...
--
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com
"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)
Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:36:25 +0100
author: Mike McMillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message <ZYeiySF7hLbIFwQY@oooah.noooah>, Martin Clark
writes
>BrritSki wrote...
>>Martin Clark wrote:
>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>>> BrritSki wrote...
>>>>>>>> Martin Clark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Plusnet wrote...
>>>>>>>>>> In article , bykimbo@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>> badriya wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming
>>>>>>>>>>> agent,calcium
>>>>>>>>>>> > chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Weight Watchers - helping people stick to their diet."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You don't want to get hung up on this diet thing.
>>>>>>>> Well not unless you want to become a stripper.
>>>>>>> Say that again and I'll give you a good pasting!
>>>>>> I thought that would get someone steaming.
>>>>> I can see you're on a roll now!
>>>> You've got me plumb...
>>> Everyone will flock to see that.
>>
>>Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost
>>and silent partner, sister Ana.
>
>I can't crown that!
It is just a load of Brolacs ...
--
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com
"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)
Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:37:56 +0100
author: Mike McMillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , Kim Andrews
writes
>BrritSki wrote:
>
>> Careful, I'm taking legal advice from Usha Glypta and her long-lost
>>and silent partner, sister Ana.
><branches off>
>
>Oh I know them, they live next-door to Mr & Mrs Ladder, don't they? Of
>course, it's her second marriage, so her son is only a step-Ladder.
>
>He's a nice boy though, going out with the Ulshions youngest, Em.
>
>And of course, her Dad's worth a bob or two. Though to be honest, most
>of it's tied up in property. He's really just a paper-millionaire.
>
Shand's only Kydding
--
Mike McMillan,
The email address is spam trapped but any genuine communications may be sent to
mike dot mcmillan at ntlworld dot com
"Let's all calm down shall we? Let's forget there is a llama in here at all."
(Lynda Snell, 010603)
Tel: (+44) 0118 9265450. website: <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.mcmillan/>
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:39:06 +0100
author: Mike McMillan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In article , badriya
wrote:
> Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
I think it is: my mother was a child during the shortages of WW1, and a
young mother during the rationing of WWII, so I was raised to think wasting
food was just WRONG. /Very/ occasionally the bottom crust of a loaf of bread
gets away, but any leftovers get recycled next day or frozen for future use.
I don't think I've /ever/ thrown away an un-opened packet of anything. My
dil sometimes rings up to ask if its ok to use something a day or so after
it's best-before date: I tell her that if it smells ok, it will be fine for
the adults, but maybe not for the baby.
Rosemary
--
Rosemary Miskin ZFC Pm miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk
Loughborough, UK http://miskin.orpheusweb.co.uk
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:41:27 +0100
author: Rosemary Miskin
|
Re: chocolate ...
"Jo Lonergan" wrote in message
news:q0km64pu4th4ui694hm4l6ues6c2cpatti@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:15:51 +0100, chris mcmillan
> wrote:
>
>
>>>At around the same time I acquired some Champagne-enhanced Marmite.
>>
>>That was just a waste of perfectly good marmite. How could you taste
>>*anything* over the salt content anyway?
>
> There is a difference, IME, between Marmite with salted or unsalted
> butter. It
> took me quite a while to get used to it when I moved to a land of
> unsalted.
>
> One of my bothers had some Guinness flavoured Marmite, which he said
> tasted
> exactly like the usual kind. Champagne would have even less chance against
> the
> prevailing marmiteness.
>
> --
> Jo
I tried both too and the Guinness one did taste more or less exactly the
same as the original. But there was a difference in the champagne one.
Don't know if it was more champagne than Guiness or some other change.
Rachael
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:09:45 +0100
author: Rachael Reynolds
|
Re: chocolate ...
Rosemary Miskin wrote:
> In article , badriya
> wrote:
>> Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
>> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
>
> I think it is:
But not *entirely*. I'm not aware of my Mum having any particular views
on this, certainly she used to use left-overs and wastn't exceptionally
wasteful, but it wasn't something she appeared to feel strongly about.
And my Dad valued tidiness over thrift and would want things thrown away
as soon as they might be considered past it, because they cluttered up
the frige/larder/wotnot.
I, on the other hand, have come to be fairly passionate about it, as
I've got older, as I've understood the issues involved. For me it's all
tied up with the whole concept of grow sustainably, consume locally,
don't waste it, and appreciate the whole "thing", whether that's using
veg trimmings for compost or stock, or meat left-overs for rissoles or
stew. It's about being in touch with what we grow and eat, and
understanding where food comes from.
--
Kimbo xx
www.booksbykimbo.com
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:47:57 +0100
author: Kim Andrews
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:09:45 +0100, "Rachael Reynolds"
wrote:
>I tried both too and the Guinness one did taste more or less exactly the
>same as the original. But there was a difference in the champagne one.
>Don't know if it was more champagne than Guiness or some other change.
>
Was it at all fizzy?
--
Jo
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:30:34 +0100
author: Jo Lonergan
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message , badriya
writes
>What goes through one fat white mother won't help the starving children
>in China. The dogs are a big help now.
The dogs are eaten by the starving Chinese children, presumably.
--
Jenny
"I always like to have the morning well-aired before I get up."
(Beau Brummel, 1778-1840)
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:43:05 +0100
author: Jenny M Benson
|
Re: chocolate ...
In message <An%ak.19881$E41.6239@text.news.virginmedia.com>, the Omrud
writes
>I reckon that young adults have never seen food which is rotten,
Can any Umrats remember, with some degree of accuracy, when they last
had a bad egg? I certainly can't.
>
>
>We saw a Dispatches programme this week which showed a young couple who
>were throwing away *one third* of the food they bought each week.
>
>I still shudder at the memory of Hugh F-W's chicken programme where he
>discovered with horror that families bought whole chickens, roasted
>them, ate the breasts and then threw out what remained.
MTAAW. I must admit I still shudder at the memory of an erstwhile Umrat
who once said she needed an extra dustbin (or more than the Council
allowed her or something) because of the amount of food she threw away
due to her children (very young, IIRC) being such fussy eaters.
--
Jenny
"I always like to have the morning well-aired before I get up."
(Beau Brummel, 1778-1840)
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:46:51 +0100
author: Jenny M Benson
|
Re: chocolate ...
Jenny M Benson wrote:
> In message <An%ak.19881$E41.6239@text.news.virginmedia.com>, the Omrud
> writes
>> I reckon that young adults have never seen food which is rotten,
>
> Can any Umrats remember, with some degree of accuracy, when they last
> had a bad egg? I certainly can't.
>>
I can. It was about 6 years ago. It came from my aunt's hens. I had
fried some bacon so it was just right and broke the egg into the pan.
It bubbled into small fragments in the most dramatic and smelly way :(
--
Jane
The potter in the purple socks
http://www.clothandclay.co.uk/umra/cookbook/contents.htm for recipes
supplied by umrats
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:42:06 +0100
author: Jane Vernon
|
Re: chocolate ...
In article , Jenny M Benson
wrote:
> Can any Umrats remember, with some degree of accuracy, when they last
> had a bad egg? I certainly can't.
Probably between 1974 and 1978 - I've certainly had (precisely) one in the
34 years of my marrioed life, and in my memeory it is in the kitchen we
moved away from in 1978. Is that accurate enough?
However, I still crack them into a cup first to check, when making a cake
with expensive ingredients. That is, I don't bother for a simple sponge, but
do for a fruit cake or gingerbread.
Rosemary
--
Rosemary Miskin ZFC Pm miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk
Loughborough, UK http://miskin.orpheusweb.co.uk
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:00:46 +0100
author: Rosemary Miskin
|
Re: chocolate ...
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:00:46 +0100, Rosemary Miskin
wrote:
>In article , Jenny M Benson
> wrote:
>> Can any Umrats remember, with some degree of accuracy, when they last
>> had a bad egg? I certainly can't.
>
>Probably between 1974 and 1978 - I've certainly had (precisely) one in the
>34 years of my marrioed life, and in my memeory it is in the kitchen we
>moved away from in 1978. Is that accurate enough?
>
>However, I still crack them into a cup first to check, when making a cake
>with expensive ingredients. That is, I don't bother for a simple sponge, but
>do for a fruit cake or gingerbread.
>
>Rosemary
I've had one in the last 3 or 4 years, but it was quite old and I
think cracked when I got it.
date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:48:27 +0100
author: badriya
|
Re: chocolate ...
"Jo Lonergan" wrote in message
news:9snr649oadqusqij7lujfb4l6e6gl8mekl@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:09:45 +0100, "Rachael Reynolds"
> wrote:
>
>>I tried both too and the Guinness one did taste more or less exactly the
>>same as the original. But there was a difference in the champagne one.
>>Don't know if it was more champagne than Guiness or some other change.
>>
> Was it at all fizzy?
>
> --
> Jo
No not fizzy. Slightly lighter tasting.
Rachael
date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 04:21:58 +0100
author: Rachael Reynolds
|
Re: chocolate ...
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
> In message , badriya
> writes
> []
>> I've had it, open in the fridge, for a while. I have some in Spain
>> too. That one is July 08! And the lemon Oct 08. I am not very good
>> at use by dates and just use things until they go off. Aanother and
>> dorters are very fussy about those. I've been known to have things
>> many years old and am then hounded to throw them away, which I hate
>> doing. Is it a generation thing? I really hate throwing food away,
>> which is one way to put on weight, eating it instead.
> []
> Well, I don't know if it is generational, but if so it can certainly be
> inherited; my mother was careful (e. g. with things like brown paper),
> and has either said or I picked up on that such behaviour was learnt in
> times of austerity; however, I think I had a happy childhood and have
> never really been short enough that it would make that much difference,
> but I still am careful (or mean) with things: sealed packs of bacon, for
> example, I let go months past the date (I do keep them in the 'fridge),
> and, like you, do have some stuff that's very old which I have no
> intention of discarding.
>
> I think some things only have sell-by dates because customer pressure
> (and possibly the company lawyers) insist they be put on: long-life milk
> _might_ be such a case, and I'm certain things like noodles are. (Plus
> of course it does force _some_ people to discard - and thus buy again -
> things which are perfectly all right.)
Long-life milk can and does go off eventually, but it leaves you in no
doubt when this happens. And I'm sure you're right about things like
(dried) noodles, and anything in cans.
But I think there are possibly risks today which weren't there in the
past: e.g there are bugs in our raw chicken and other meats that were
perhaps not so prevalent when farming was less intensive. Also, in
prepared or pre-packed produce, it's already been handled during the
packing process to some extent, which may have left bacteria etc that
could grow and cause contamination. This can give problems before it
gets to the smelly stage that would alert you.
I don't take chances with anything that's prepared with eggs (e.g.
mayonnaise), or with meat or fish. But otherwise I will seek a second
opinion (mine) before accepting that something that's reached the magic
date is no longer edible.
--
Marjorie
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:52:24 +0100
author: Marjorie
|
Re: chocolate ...
Kim Andrews wrote:
> badriya wrote:
>>
>> gum,flavoring,presrevative,potatsium sorbate, firming agent,calcium
>> chloride, sweetner,acesulframe potassium,colour anthoccyanins
>
> Ye gods, I've seen more appetising lists on wallpaper paste! :(
>
Well I suppose that's how they do it. Because they've reduced the sugar
content, they've had to add various preservatives to make it keep longer
and get the texture right.
I make my own jams and they contain fruit and sugar. That's all. But
they are not low-calorie - I suppose I could just spread them thinly,
but I don't, they're too good.
--
Marjorie
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:57:31 +0100
author: Marjorie
|
Re: chocolate ...
In article <b7adnQFf-6ZH-urVnZ2dnUVZ8tvinZ2d@posted.plusnet>, Marjorie
wrote:
> I make my own jams and they contain fruit and sugar. That's all. But
> they are not low-calorie - I suppose I could just spread them thinly,
> but I don't, they're too good.
YANAOU!! I'm currently resting in the glow of achievement emanating from
the 14 jars of raspberry jam cooling in the kitchen!
And, to merge threads neatly, a preserving pan is another thing that
benefits from filling with water before it cools: getting it clean if the
jam remains are allowed to set is a real nuisance.
Rosemary
--
Rosemary Miskin ZFC Pm miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk
Loughborough, UK http://miskin.orpheusweb.co.uk
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:26:04 +0100
author: Rosemary Miskin
|
Re: chocolate ...
Rosemary Miskin wrote in
news:ac.7650a94fbd.a702a0miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk:
> In article <b7adnQFf-6ZH-urVnZ2dnUVZ8tvinZ2d@posted.plusnet>, Marjorie
> wrote:
>> I make my own jams and they contain fruit and sugar. That's all. But
>> they are not low-calorie - I suppose I could just spread them thinly,
>> but I don't, they're too good.
>
>
> YANAOU!! I'm currently resting in the glow of achievement emanating from
> the 14 jars of raspberry jam cooling in the kitchen!
>
> And, to merge threads neatly, a preserving pan is another thing that
> benefits from filling with water before it cools: getting it clean if the
> jam remains are allowed to set is a real nuisance.
Getting the jam remains out while they're still hot is a bit hard on the
fingers. Worth it though.
--
Jim <http://www.jim-easterbrook.me.uk/>
1959/1985? M B+ G+ A L I- S- P-- CH0(p) Ar++ T+ H0 Q--- Sh0
date: 12 Jul 2008 07:21:52 GMT
author: Jim Easterbrook
|
Re: chocolate ...
Rosemary Miskin wrote:
> In article <b7adnQFf-6ZH-urVnZ2dnUVZ8tvinZ2d@posted.plusnet>, Marjorie
> wrote:
>> I make my own jams and they contain fruit and sugar. That's all. But
>> they are not low-calorie - I suppose I could just spread them thinly,
>> but I don't, they're too good.
>
>
> YANAOU!! I'm currently resting in the glow of achievement emanating from
> the 14 jars of raspberry jam cooling in the kitchen!
Waife made some plum and cherry jam a couple of days ago - plums were
falling fast and needed using and she had some cooked Amareno cherries
in the fridge that she threw in.
Not a combination I've ever heard of, but it's absolutely delicious.
date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:04:38 +0200
author: BrritSki
|
|
|