Re: M'I`5'Persecution ' BB C Newsc asters Lie & Deny T heyre Wa tching Me
wrote in message news:hk0711260926053192@4ax.com...
>
> MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters. Lie & Deny They're Watching Me
>
> Central to the persecution campaign waged against. me for some nine years
> now by the Security Service is their use of. the media, and in particular
> the broadcast media, to make clear to me. that I am under surveillance and
> being watched within my own home, even. by BBC newscasters while they read
> the news.. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the
> television and radio. are so sure that they can never be caught, that they
> have many times made explicity clear on. broadcast programmes that they
> are
> as capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the. broadcast pictures. Even
> when they. have known I am taping the programmes they still carry on this
> practice; for examples. of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see
> the Evidence area of. my website.
>
> If you wish to reply to this. article......
> then please include your name and fax number! I provide the means. for
> recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics. discussed, but ask
> that
> you provide. me with your fax number or email address if you require a
> response.. Also would you please send not more than one or two pages, if
> by
> fax.. Thank-you!
>
>
> It. started with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today
>
> The. very first incident in the story started with a reaction by an ITN
> newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine years ago. now.
> She
> reacted to what she saw in my living room at home as. she read the news.
> My
> mother. had brought an apple for me into the room, whereupon the
> newsreader
> smirked and giggled, apparently finding this funny.. I couldn't believe
> what I was seeing. I. carried on watching news and other television
> programmes to see if presenters would. show signs of "interactive
> watching"; to my surprise, this. happened again and again. Unfortunately,
> I
> did not have my wits sufficiently about. me to videotape these programmes,
> and it is now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back. to 1990.
>
> However, I have been busy recording everything Ive watched the last.
> couple
> of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets,. which you will find if
> you point your. Web browser at the "evidence" area of my website, whose
> URL
> address is given above. Strangely it is not particularly the BBC. who are
> "after me". at the moment (with the exception of occasional fire from
> Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed. paragon of virtue and decency Jon
> Snow of Channel Four TV News (he actually works. for ITN), who once
> claimed
> hed turned. down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover Snows
> recent
> actions in a future. article.
>
> BBCs. Hidden Shame
>
> The first ever Usenet. post (internet newsgroup article) on the subject of
> the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred,. as stated in a previous article,
> in. early May 1995. It is reproduced here;
>
> Date:. Thu May 4 18:27:24 1995
> Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy
> Subject: BBC's. Hidden Shame
>
> Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984?. The ones which
> watched. you back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could
> be turned. down?
>
> Well. the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his
> nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the. British have
> been waging. war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to
> invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted. media in their
> efforts to humiliate. their "victim".
>
> I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more of a wish than a fact.. It may be
> hidden, but the BBC and other media. and security organisations seem to
> have no. shame whatever in their anti-social, not to say criminal,
> actions. Nor do the general public, who seem quite happy to. parrot the
> vilest obscenities without. much hesitation or apparently thought.
>
> Martyn. Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and the rest
>
> Most of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I wasnt making. any
> recordings,. and the BBC wont release copies of current affairs programmes
> from that period.... so. although I can remember there were many incidents
> in that time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the. actual programmes to
> flesh out the. bones.
>
> This year, there. has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as
> newsreader, which I have. successfully recorded and digitized,
> i.e. converted into a computer Quicktime. movie file. This has not yet
> found its way onto my website. (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can
> be
> sure I. will let the readership of these articles know when that clip
> makes
> it onto the web.. The Witchell clip was recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999
> at 7pm,. and shows Witchell trying to restrain his features from
> collapsing
> into a. smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then with
> the non-excuse. of a non-joke his entire face twists into a grin. It looks
> as. if he finds me so funny, that he allows himself to submerge any
> pretence. at professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired sarcasm and
> harassment.
>
> The two. BBC newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most vividly
> over. the years are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember
> thinking years ago that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and. if
> the other two are watching then there. would be no reason why he wouldnt
> be
> doing the same; but in all. honesty I cannot remember a single clear
> instance. of his reacting through facial or verbal expression to me.
>
> I can remember several instances of Martyn Lewis. reacting to what he saw
> of me, however. In. early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis on a
> small black-and-white. portable TV at my then home in Oxford. I threw a
> term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made. a comment
> from which I understood that he had been on. my side, but might have
> changed his mind as a result of what Id. just said to him.
>
> And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn. Lewis clearly reacting to what he
> saw
> of me at. my then accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing to stare
> at some fixed point. near the camera after the news had finished -
> presumably this is where the. monitor interactively showing pictures of my
> room was. located.
>
> Why would BBC and. other Newscasters Watch and Harass Me, Watching Them?
>
> This is a very difficult question,. and I dont actually know the answer.
> It
> is a matter of record that the Secret Services are very much part. of the
> Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6 Agent List" on. the
> internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5. and
> MI6
> are recruited from the ranks of the Establishment. Obviously. the
> relationship is bi-directional; the Establishment. influences MI5/MI6, but
> the secret. services (well, perhaps not so secret now we know who works
> for
> MI6!!!) also influence. the machinery of power and information
> dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they. must have a lot of
> covert leverage with the BBC. and ITN.
>
> Some of this leverage is obviously. through bribery. It is a matter of
> record that MI5 tried some. years ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four
> TV. He turned them down - obviously they must have approached other. media
> people as well, and from the. lack of other reports of people turning them
> down, it may. be presumed that some other journalists will have accepted
> the sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon. Snow has been taking
> part. in the recent "watching" actions against me - but why he has allowed
> himself to be used. by the secret services is something which I do not
> know.
>
> Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail. to twist arms of journalists
> into. co-operating with them? I have always thought there was something
> slightly odd about Martyn. Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron Davies
> "rough. trade" scandal it was reported that MI5 had known all about Davies
> predilections and. the sham of his pretence to be a happily married
> man. Perhaps MI5 have been able to dig something up from. Martyn Lewiss
> private life to blackmail him into acting on. their behalf? And if there
> wasnt anything before the "newscaster watching" started then there. most
> certainly is. something now.... once theyve started watching, the
> newscasters will surely. wish their activities to remain covered-up, and
> co-operate with the security. service.
>
> "Newscaster Watching" Deliberately. Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia
>
> Presumably this is the first case in history of television. journalists
> actually. taking part in acts of real-time, live spying and reacting
> against one of their viewers. What you have to understand, though, is.
> that
> I was. quite mentally healthy in June 1990, certainly relative to November
> 1992, when after two. and a half years of harassment I was finally
> admitted
> to hospital as. an out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that they
> would
> make me mad; they constructed the media harassment to resemble. what would
> be reported by a person with mental illness; and. then they carried on
> years of. abuse to inflict on me the condition which they wished to use as
> an. excuse to cover up their abuses.
>
> I sold my portable TV in autumn 1990 and. stopped watching television
> regularly. I realise now that this may have been a mistake.. What I should
> have done was to watch TV. and listen to the radio, but tape-record
> everything and make a note of what each excerpt meant to. me. I would then
> be in a much stronger position as regards to evidence. that I am now. That
> is what I am trying to do now, but. unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters
> have stopped getting at me, now they know they. are being recorded.
>
> When I started. publicising my case on internet newsgroups in 1995, I was
> met with the disbelief. one might expect to be accorded to a mentally ill
> person. who talks about "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some
> newsgroup participants thought I had started a "troll",. an invention made
> to obtain a. reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of
> psychology students were behind. the articles. But most people thought the
> articles were symptomatic of derangement. - and that is exactly what MI5
> want people to think. MI5 chose me as a target because I was. mildly
> mentally ill at. the outset in 1990, although I stress my illness then was
> very. mild in comparison with November 1992, and because they knew that
> enough abuse would (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b) once. I
> was
> more ill,. they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately
> constructed
> to look like the symptoms. of paranoid schizophrenia.
>
> Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in. Writing
>
> In February 1997 I wrote to BBC Viewer &. Listener Correspondence and
> asked
> them to. investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged in
> "real-time spying" on me. They. replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis
> and Michael Buerk. whether they had engaged in such practices, and that
> they had both made verbal denials to. VLC, but were refusing to put their
> denials in. writing.
>
> To me it looks as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but. not in
> writing, because written falsehoods would place. them unambiguously in the
> wrong, whereas they. can try to talk their way out of verbal lies if they
> are ever caught, or perhaps even. deny the verbal lies completely? If they
> lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about. future lies
> about. lying?
>
> BBC-VLC. also said that the BBC "would never engage in any form of
> surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly Martyn. Lewis and
> the. rest have lied to their own organisations personnel about their
> criminal. actions. So much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a nest of
> shabby. liars.
>
> Summons against the. BBC, for Nuisance caused by Newscaster Spying
>
> In March 1997 I issued a civil. summons against the BBC, seeking
> injunction
> against further "newscaster spying", and token. damages for what the BBC
> had done. to me until that date. The purpose of the summons was to try to
> "smoke out". the BBC, since obviously I did not have good evidence which
> would be necessary for. either a civil or criminal case to be made against
> them. My. summons was worded as follows;
>
> 1. The plaintiff is and. was at all material times residing at [home
> address]. At. some time prior to or during June 1990, persons of unknown
> identity entered Plaintiff's premises and installed. concealed television
> equipment in said. premises.
>
> 2. A campaign. of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff by the
> persons of unknown. identity, which in part took the form of instigating
> harassment by BBC TV newscasters (including. specifically Michael Buerk
> and
> Martyn Lewis) as. they read news bulletins, by making direct and personal
> comments. to Plaintiff.
>
> 3. The campaigns purpose was to. subject Plaintiff to great mental stress
> and induce mental breakdown. As a result. of it Plaintiff did indeed
> suffer
> from severe. mental strain in 1990-97.
>
> 4. In order to avoid the mental strain. being caused to him the Plaintiff
> has been compelled to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant. therefore
> committed the tort of. private nuisance, since normal use of home was
> interfered. with.
>
> 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent. injunction prohibiting further nuisance,
> and. damages for nuisance suffered limited to 5,000.
>
> Naturally,. my attempt to smoke-out the BBC and its lying newscasters
> failed. The BBCs litigation department sought. to have my summons struck
> out; and they succeeded in. doing so, on the grounds of my action
> "disclosing no reasonable cause. of action". I was also prevented from
> issuing further civil claims against. the BBC without leave of the
> Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually. have their
> claims struck out. with this wording, regardless of the merit of their
> claims.
>
> BBC Suppresses my. Claims of "Watching by Newscasters"
>
> BBCs staff magazine. Ariel ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders Spying on my
> home" for one issue. in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was
> spotted. and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see
> webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm
> Clearly the. BBC will not allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public
> in the media. channels it controls.
>
> On. several occasions people said to my face that harassment from the TV
> was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent. the evening
> in
> the local pub the Rose. and Crown with the company's technical director
> Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to. me and said
> to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he. the bloke who's been on TV?" to which
> Phil replied,. "Yes, I think so".
>
> The reader might. think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be a
> relatively benign happening. But it is not; it is part of MI5s. framework
> of harassment and lies. On many occasions. the reactions of the BBCs
> newscasters to. me has been in the nature of sarcasm, implicit contempt
> and
> abuse. This is. visible in Witchells news programme mentioned above, where
> he engages in abuse. by laughing at me during his newsreading. It was
> particularly visible in the early period of 1990-92, and. as late as
> Autumn
> 1993, when during a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed. a
> football person about soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave. vent
> to
> an unsubtle rant about "theyre idiots, theyre. just idiots, keep up the
> surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing. he understood and was
> taking part in the abuse being perpetrated on that. programme.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The MI5 Persecution started with. harassment by television newscasters,
> and
> today. harassment by TV and radio presenters still forms a key part of
> MI5s
> activities against me. When this. business started in June 1990 I was in
> relatively good health. of mind. Years of persecution by the secret police
> and their mouthpieces in. the state-run BBC and other media eroded my
> health until MI5 achieved. their aim of seeing me rendered mentally ill in
> November 1992. The. diagnosis which was forced on me unfortunately and
> ironically meant that my reports of. the harassment are disregarded,
> because the mentally ill are. second-class citizens in todays Britain.
>
> Yet TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form,. despite
> my taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to.
> obtain
> and demonstrate objectively on the website instances. of media presenters
> attacking me. Unfortunately these recorded instances. are quite tenuous; I
> might understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre. doing,
> but despite. many thousands of people knowing the truth of the "newscaster
> watching",. the omerta continues and they continue to refuse to admit the
> truth of the. matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society that
> there is not even one decent person willing. to speak out. I look forward
> to. the day when the truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption
> which has allowed the MI5 persecution. to take place is finally purged and
> the Establishment criminals. caught and appropriately punished.
>
> 5837
>
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:48:06 -0000
author: GMK
|
