To whom it may concern



Many of you may recall the controversy over the murder of the TV
journalist Jill Dando in particular the conviction of Barry George for
this crime.  It is widely believed that Mr George does not have the
intellectual capacity to plan and execute such a crime, recently I have
seen the proof that he did not commit it, I have been suspicious that
there has been a cover up for some considerable time but now I am
certain.

Sometime after Mr George was convicted the police were contacted by a
journalist who'd had a brief fling with a woman police officer, and she
had told him shortly before Jill Dando was shot that there was a
contract out on a famous journalist.  He hadn't reported this at the
time but when he had problems with a former girlfriend she had offered
to obtain an untraceable gun for him and his suspicions had been
aroused.  The police ignored him, deriding him as a crank, one of
several hundred spurious leads and an outright publicity seeker, but
four years ago he was raided in connection with an unrelated matter and
his computer was seized. When it was examined detectives found
correspondence including e-mails linking him to the lady armourer. In
one of the e-mails she stated brazenly that she had supplied the Dando
murder weapon but that no one would even investigate the link because
as a police officer she was above suspicion.

A high level meeting was held at Tintagel House where it was decided
that the computer should be destroyed.  It was, but like every
conscientious journalist the writer had a back up copy.

Realising he was up against a brick wall he decided not to go public
but continued with his business.  He is currently bringing an action
against the Met for the wilful destruction of his computer.  His
original claim was for a mere five thousand pounds but rather than
cough up the Met has to date spent over a hundred thousand pounds of
public money fighting the case and trying by hook or by crook to get it
thrown out.  Hoping to complicate matters they dragged it up from the
small claims court to the multitrack little thinking that it would now
be heard in public.

The trial opens at Park Crescent court in Central London on Wednesday,
case number 5CL12287.

The Met are contesting the claim in its entirety and have called in no
less than three expert witnesses to debunk the claim that the computer
was damaged while in police custody. One of their experts is a time
serving Freemason named Nicolas Harlow.  Hawlow has an interesting
sideline in doctoring computer evidence, it was him who planted child
porn on the computer of one of the Kahar brothers after the bungled
Forest Gate raid. One of Ian Blair's underlings had suggested planting
evidence linking them to a terrorist cell but the plan was considered
far too risky and not plausible in view of their known lack of
terrorist connections,  dirty pictures is a different story and will do
far more to alienate the victims with their own community and to cover
the police tracks than anything heavy.

You may be asking yourself at this point how I know all this. My name
is Georgina Perks,  I am a qualified solicitor,  and up until recently
I was employed by Bircham Dyson Bell who are the solicitors for the
Metropolitan Police.. I objected staunchly to these schemes when I was
brought in, and when I refused to become a conspirator I was sacked on
the spot.


Ask yourself why the police would have spent so much money contesting
one small claim and gone to such lengths and so many dirty tricks.

Ask yourself too if some of the recent terrorist cells allegedly
unearthed haven't been set up by police agents provocateurs in the
first place.

This message is a matter of public importance, and I don't care who
knows.