Evidence That a Frozen Fish Didn't Impact the Pentagon on 9-11-and
Neither Did a Boeing 757
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/Above_Top_Secret_article.htm

The claim that promoters of the "no plane at the Pentagon" theory were
doing immense damage to the truth/accountability movement was raised in
Mike Ruppert's book Crossing the Rubicon. In a stunning piece of warped
logic, Ruppert claimed that, while he is quite convinced that it was
not Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, he chose not to talk about or deal
with the subject as part of his overall case for conspiracy because of
the "implications". According to Ruppert, the "implications" are that
anyone that suggests that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, is then
forced to answer the question as to what actually happened to Flight
77. If that's the case, then we better just wrap up the whole 9/11
Truth Movement and go home and have a beer.

Ruppert balks at the idea of offering an answer to this question to his
readers because, he claims, most people would be unable to accept it,
and, he suggests, 9/11 researchers serve only to alienate the public
support that they wish to attract by stretching the boundaries of the
collective belief system. What Ruppert doesn't explain is why any
member of the public would happily accept that U.S. government
officials participated in the slaughter of the passengers on Flights 11
and 175 and the occupants of the WTC towers (as he details in his book)
yet would be unable to accept the idea that the same government
officials played a part in disposing of the passengers of Flight 77 in
a much less imaginative way. Let's be honest here, in the context of
9/11 being the work of a faction of the US government and military, the
answer to the question as to what happened to Flight 77 if it didn't
hit the Pentagon is quite obvious - Flight 77 and its occupants were
flown to a specific destination and "disposed of" by the
conspirators. That's pretty simple; cut and dried; no need for much
stretching there! But, for some reason, Ruppert (and others affected by
this paramoralism) seems to think that killing thousands of citizens by
crashing airplanes is easier to accept than cold bloodedly murdering
them "in person," as it were.


Also see:
COINTELPRO Updates:  Above Top Secret Forum
http://laura-knight-jadczyk.blogspot.com/

Things have been pretty interesting around here in the past week. Seems
that Joe Quinn's critique of the Above Top Secret forum posting about
the 757 that did NOT hit the Pentagon has hit a nerve.

The first indication that we had that something was up was the fact
that the Signs of The Times site statistics had a bit of a surge.

Now we keep a pretty good eye on our site statistics because we like to
know what subjects really interest our readers. So when there is a
surge, we know we are doing our job. This is most particularly true
with the publication of the Pentagon Strike video: obviously, so many
people "resonated" to the facts presented in this video that the
current number of viewers is approacing 600 million.

Yes, that's right: 600 MILLION. It will soon be one of the most widely
disseminated items ever to be published on the internet.

For the "Powers That Be," that's a problem.

Enter: Above Top Secret Forum.