EXCLUSIVE - The Sun newspaper stung to the tune of 65,000 quid

Notice the quote is the 'prime suspect' 'confessed' under duress
to the rape and murder of Hannah Foster.
If  Sun reporters bothered to look in English language versions
of the Indian press eg
http://www.newkerala.com/news.php?action=fullnews&id=99426
http://news.webindia123.com/news/showdetails.asp?id=237211&cat=India
 http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1614277,0008.htm

They would see she had consensual sex with someone
prior to her murder , presumably someone known to her,
not some Sikl 20 years older than herself and not known to her,
in the back of a Hazelwood Sandwich delivery van.
Source: - From the Home Office pathologist's
report. So charge has dad to be changed to just murder.
Why would someone falsely confess to rape when they
are supposed to have had consensual sex ?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006060045,00.html
EXCLUSIVE
 I'll get justice for Hannah
 Brave battle ... Hilary and Trevor will go to India
 By JAMIE PYATT
THE mother of murdered Hannah Foster is flying to India to hasten the
suspect's extradition despite battling breast cancer.
Hilary Foster, 49, wants to see Maninder Pal Singh Kohli, 37, face a British
court.
He fled his UK home days after Hannah's murder in Southampton in March 2003
and was caught in Bengal in 2004 after The Sun and Hants police put up a
£65,000 reward there.
Kohli allegedly confessed on TV but later denied raping and strangling
Hannah, 17.
No date for extradition has been set even though he has been in court 67
TIMES.
Hilary was diagnosed soon after his arrest and had a breast op, chemotherapy
and radiotherapy last year.
She is now well enough to go to India this month with hubby Trevor, 55, to
try to cut through the red tape.
Hilary, of Southampton, said: "There is no way my cancer will get in the way
of justice. Kohli says he is innocent. I want to see him come back and prove
it."
The couple will see Kohli at one of his weekly remand hearings.
Trevor said: "I'll know when I look into his eyes if he is the evil b*****d
that took Hannah."
 End Quote
The victim's parents will get a very rude awakening
when they get to India because of the lies from
Hampshire Police and total lack of coverage
in the UK press
 Background

14 March 2003 murder of Hannah Foster
19 March release to the media police searching for a couple of Asian lads
as suspect harasser/murderer,  - later turned themselves in and were
excluded..
26 March Crimewatch program about the murder.
An "aggrieved" in a family dispute takes the opportunity
to stitch-up her Asian relative by anonymously informing Crimewatch.
Knowing that her relative had left the country a few days after
the murder and that he lived fairly local to the abduction site.
Then the rest takes a momentum of its own

English language version of Indian newspaper report 10 April 2003 so
accessible to Hants police as easily as myself.

Quote
"In fact, Maninderpal has been attached to his mother who in December
last year received a serious head injury after an accident with a bus.
Since then she has been in coma. He wanted to come and settle down
in India. That is why he sold his flat in England. He has some
problems with his in-laws," says Mr I- holding that Maninderpal had
gone to England in 1994 on marriage basis.
....
End Quote

Easy for police to confirm whether Maninder had sold his flat and enquire
at Home Office/Foreign Office about passport problems. Both being
reasons for the timing of Maninder's pre-planned journey to India.

Now police are, in all probability, searching for a totally innocent bod
and investigation for the real killer is put on the back-burner
and any possible leads gone cold. On 17 Sept 2004 part of the
pathologist's report was unattributedly put in the public domain.
[ cf recent Sun newspaper exposure of people's CC details bought in India ,
nothing in UK press about this more significant Indian leal ]
It looks genuine as there is reference to
"autopsy report of the Royal Hampshire County Hospital,
March 17, 2003 " which is not obvious
as she was resident in Southampton but as body found just inside Eastleigh
boundary
it would come under Winchester, not Southampton jurisdiction. Quotations
"there was no evidence of sexual assault. ",
" report rules out rape, it does record evidence suggesting
sexual intercourse ". Highly suggestive that the murderer new the victim and
that he maybe lived in Portsmouth / Southsea area. Killer and victim
known to one another would explain why no one saw/heard the abduction. If
the murderer lived in
Southampton then dumping the body in the first bit of unlit road outside the
city and then returning home, makes sense. But the murderer continued
on to Portsmouth / Southsea where her purse and phone were found. Someone
who
was so addled that he placed in a bottle bank instead of disposing of less
traceably.
Too late now of course, but I would have consulted a wine expert. To
determine from
rarity of bottles found closely associated with the purse, then public
appeal to
locate which bin. Then door-to-door enquiries in that area  for anyone
who may have known the Portswood teenager. She was
'abducted' from a wholly residential area without
anyone hearing or seeing anything amiss.


What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
was on http://www.nutteing.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.

Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.

date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:16:25 -0000 author: paul nutteing