|
|
|
date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:07:40 -0000,
group: uk.media.broadband
back
Starnge problem and ping results
I've noticed problems with my bb connection. I can get online no probs but
when I play any online game it really stutters and ends with me being kicked
from the server, even though my ping is very low. I've raised this with my
ISP and have done several tests and the results are very strange - look
below:
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
Ping statistics for 195.149.33.68:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = -14ms, Average = 8ms
Tracing route to www-v.nildram.net [195.149.33.68]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms my.router [192.168.1.1]
2 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lo1-lon3-adsl20.nildram.net [195.112.5.29]
3 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lon3-14.nildram.net [84.12.224.29]
4 4294967282 ms 17 ms 16 ms lon1-13.nildram.net [84.12.224.18]
5 4294967284 ms 18 ms 17 ms www1-v.nildram.net [195.149.33.68]
Trace complete.
I've never seen minus numbers in ping rate or such a high number. I'm using
a router (Draytek Vigor 2600G) and all was well until a few days ago. Any
suggestions would be appreciated.
date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:07:40 -0000
author: themillman
|
Re: Starnge problem and ping results
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
themillman wrote:
> I've noticed problems with my bb connection. I can get online no
> probs but when I play any online game it really stutters and ends
> with me being kicked from the server, even though my ping is very
> low. I've raised this with my ISP and have done several tests and
> the results are very strange - look below:
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
>
> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
>
>
>
> Ping statistics for 195.149.33.68:
>
> Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
>
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
>
> Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = -14ms, Average = 8ms
>
>
>
> Tracing route to www-v.nildram.net [195.149.33.68]
>
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
>
>
> 1 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms my.router [192.168.1.1]
>
> 2 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lo1-lon3-adsl20.nildram.net
> [195.112.5.29]
> 3 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lon3-14.nildram.net [84.12.224.29]
>
> 4 4294967282 ms 17 ms 16 ms lon1-13.nildram.net
> [84.12.224.18]
> 5 4294967284 ms 18 ms 17 ms www1-v.nildram.net
> [195.149.33.68]
>
>
> Trace complete.
>
>
>
> I've never seen minus numbers in ping rate or such a high number. I'm
> using a router (Draytek Vigor 2600G) and all was well until a few
> days ago. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Very odd. You obviously can't have negative ping times! Chances are that
it's a larger *positive* time than the software can handle, and is displayed
as negative due to its twos-complement value.
It's still odd though - because I would expect it to time out rather than
report a very large (or negative) value. Have you set a timeout value with
the -w parameter, rather than using the default? When it reports these large
values, how long does it *actually* take to respond - assuming that you're
watching it?
--
Cheers,
Roger
______
Please reply to newsgroup.
Reply address IS valid, but is disposable in the event of excessive
spam.
date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:52 -0000
author: Roger Mills \(aka Tiscali Tim\)
|
Re: Starnge problem and ping results
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:52 -0000, "Roger Mills \(aka Tiscali Tim\)"
wrote:
It could be your MTU settings giving the problem or it could be slow
dns resolve. I would try the MTU first. see
http://help.expedient.net/broadband/mtu.shtml
>In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
>themillman wrote:
>
>> I've noticed problems with my bb connection. I can get online no
>> probs but when I play any online game it really stutters and ends
>> with me being kicked from the server, even though my ping is very
>> low. I've raised this with my ISP and have done several tests and
>> the results are very strange - look below:
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=-15ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
>>
>> Reply from 195.149.33.68: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
>>
>>
>>
>> Ping statistics for 195.149.33.68:
>>
>> Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
>>
>> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
>>
>> Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = -14ms, Average = 8ms
>>
>>
>>
>> Tracing route to www-v.nildram.net [195.149.33.68]
>>
>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms my.router [192.168.1.1]
>>
>> 2 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lo1-lon3-adsl20.nildram.net
>> [195.112.5.29]
>> 3 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms lon3-14.nildram.net [84.12.224.29]
>>
>> 4 4294967282 ms 17 ms 16 ms lon1-13.nildram.net
>> [84.12.224.18]
>> 5 4294967284 ms 18 ms 17 ms www1-v.nildram.net
>> [195.149.33.68]
>>
>>
>> Trace complete.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've never seen minus numbers in ping rate or such a high number. I'm
>> using a router (Draytek Vigor 2600G) and all was well until a few
>> days ago. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>Very odd. You obviously can't have negative ping times! Chances are that
>it's a larger *positive* time than the software can handle, and is displayed
>as negative due to its twos-complement value.
>
>It's still odd though - because I would expect it to time out rather than
>report a very large (or negative) value. Have you set a timeout value with
>the -w parameter, rather than using the default? When it reports these large
>values, how long does it *actually* take to respond - assuming that you're
>watching it?
date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:35:23 +0000
author: Samuria
|
|
|