On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>> You still haven't answered the question.  What does "hire white,
>> promote white" mean?
>>
>
>It means to hire white and promote white.

As opposed to what alternative?  

>
>
>>>>
>>>> You wish me to re-frame it; so much so, that
>>>>>you re-frame it for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps since you've asked me three redundant questions and asserted a
>>>>>lie,
>>>>>you will allow me to ask one question of you. Why is it discriminatory 
>>>>>to
>>>>>refuse to hire someone with poor English language skills?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't.
>>>
>>>It is as you are more than aware. Feigning ignorance of a threat, while
>>>attempting to convince people there is no such threat is vile and 
>>>repugnant
>>>beyond human. Here is at least some substance to support my claim and I 
>>>will
>>>choose to ignore the obvious lack of substance that you have provided with
>>>your claim. Please pay special attention to the phrases "special 
>>>measures...
>>>to correct the conditions of disadvantage".
>>>
>>>Please also note that Employment Equity while it applies to the Federal
>>>Workforce, has equivalent programs (read: pogrom), in the general 
>>>workforce
>>>known as Diversity Programs.
>>>
>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability and,
>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of disadvantage
>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the 
>>>principle
>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way 
>>>but
>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>
>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>
>It's not. 

Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?

"David Johnston"  wrote in message
news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" 
> wrote:
>
>>> You still haven't answered the question.  What does "hire white,
>>> promote white" mean?
>>>
>>
>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>
> As opposed to what alternative?

The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.


>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You wish me to re-frame it; so much so, that
>>>>>>you re-frame it for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps since you've asked me three redundant questions and asserted a
>>>>>>lie,
>>>>>>you will allow me to ask one question of you. Why is it discriminatory
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>refuse to hire someone with poor English language skills?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't.
>>>>
>>>>It is as you are more than aware. Feigning ignorance of a threat, while
>>>>attempting to convince people there is no such threat is vile and
>>>>repugnant
>>>>beyond human. Here is at least some substance to support my claim and I
>>>>will
>>>>choose to ignore the obvious lack of substance that you have provided
>>>>with
>>>>your claim. Please pay special attention to the phrases "special
>>>>measures...
>>>>to correct the conditions of disadvantage".
>>>>
>>>>Please also note that Employment Equity while it applies to the Federal
>>>>Workforce, has equivalent programs (read: pogrom), in the general
>>>>workforce
>>>>known as Diversity Programs.
>>>>
>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
>>>>and,
>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>disadvantage
>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>principle
>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way
>>>>but
>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>>
>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>
>>It's not.
>
> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?

English language skills are irrelevant?? ROFLMA

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>
>"David Johnston"  wrote in message
>news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> You still haven't answered the question.  What does "hire white,
>>>> promote white" mean?
>>>>
>>>
>>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>>
>> As opposed to what alternative?
>
>The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
>this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.

I see no reason to.  Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
what you mean?  

>
>>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>>employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
>>>>>and,
>>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>>disadvantage
>>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>>principle
>>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way
>>>>>but
>>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>>>
>>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>>
>>>It's not.
>>
>> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
>
>English language skills are irrelevant?? 

I can see why you'd think so.  After all, you religiously avoid making
any clear statements.

"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
news:5ouvq3t2iq8cqarnvp84p58qml8dr9l965@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500, "Meldon" 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Johnston"  wrote in message
>>news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You still haven't answered the question.  What does "hire white,
>>>>> promote white" mean?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>>>
>>> As opposed to what alternative?
>>
>>The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
>>this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.
>
> I see no reason to.  Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
> what you mean?

It means what it says. Why do you require remedial help?


>
>>
>>>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>>>employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
>>>>>>and,
>>>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>>>disadvantage
>>>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>>>principle
>>>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same 
>>>>>>way
>>>>>>but
>>>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>>>>
>>>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>>>
>>>>It's not.
>>>
>>> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
>>
>>English language skills are irrelevant??
>
> I can see why you'd think so.  After all, you religiously avoid making
> any clear statements.

Mine was not a statement. English language skills are relevant (that is a 
statement), but I can see why you would think they were not, since you have 
repeatedly demonstrated such poor comprehension that you require special 
assistance.

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:56:21 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>> I see no reason to.  Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
>> what you mean?
>
>It means what it says.

It says nothing.  "White" is just a colour.

"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
news:sm10r3p8rlgupeq2fe3t6cm9gtl7gvlrs4@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:56:21 -0500, "Meldon" 
> wrote:
>
>>> I see no reason to.  Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
>>> what you mean?
>>
>>It means what it says.
>
> It says nothing.  "White" is just a colour.

White as it pertains to ethnicity.