Why now, is there such a sudden and vociferous call for free speech, bashing 
a forty year-old commission and publicly trashing someone who otherwise 
would fit the very best examples of public service?



"...Isn't there something a little odd in a supposedly necessary Canadian 
federal "human rights" system used all but exclusively by one lone Canadian 
who served as a long-time employee of that system? Why should Richard Warman 
be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition? You can hardly 
blame the Canadian Islamic Congress and the Islamic Supreme Council of 
Canada and no doubt the Supreme All-Powerful Islamic Executive Council of 
Swift Current, Sask., for now figuring they'd like a piece of the human 
rights action. ..." - MARK STEYN, Why should Richard Warman be the only 
citizen to have his own personal inquisition?


http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080117_24131_24131&page=2http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080117_24131_24131&page=2

Meldon used his keyboard to write :
> Why now, is there such a sudden and vociferous call for free speech, bashing 
> a forty year-old commission and publicly trashing someone who otherwise would 
> fit the very best examples of public service?

Discerning readers will know... heh heh...

>
>
>
> "...Isn't there something a little odd in a supposedly necessary Canadian 
> federal "human rights" system used all but exclusively by one lone Canadian 
> who served as a long-time employee of that system? Why should Richard Warman 
> be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition? You can hardly 
> blame the Canadian Islamic Congress and the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada 
> and no doubt the Supreme All-Powerful Islamic Executive Council of Swift 
> Current, Sask., for now figuring they'd like a piece of the human rights 
> action. ..." - MARK STEYN, Why should Richard Warman be the only citizen to 
> have his own personal inquisition?
>
>
> http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080117_24131_24131&page=2http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080117_24131_24131&page=2