Among the prolific many of articles devoted to the Levant Holocaust, here's 
an interesting one written in a point, counter-point format with a distinct 
fascist undertone. Please notice how one point is how bad and overreaching 
the commission is and the other point is that everyone should watch what 
they say. In essence, both positions argue for more fascism.

"..Point - Ridiculous cases are set up to favor the complainant by default 
because the AHRC is based on a presumption of guilt rather than innocence, 
and when you combine this with the lack of any financial or legal 
responsibility for the accuser, it becomes the perfect recourse for 
litigious and spiteful people who have little legal bearing to carry out 
their personal vendettas.

Counter-point - If you've got nothing good to say, exercise restraint and 
shut up.."

http://www.thegatewayonline.ca/point-counterpoint-levant-vs-ahrcc-where-to-draw-the-line-on-free-speech-20080124-1720.html

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>Among the prolific many of articles devoted to the Levant Holocaust, 

My sympathies go out to the Levants, whoever they may be.

On 29-Jan-2008, David Johnston  wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon"

I spotted him, I spotted him!
What do I win?

Susan

 
> wrote:
>
> >Among the prolific many of articles devoted to the Levant Holocaust,
>
> My sympathies go out to the Levants, whoever they may be.

"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
news:6j2vp31jsccpa0si9aubjs6lqg3j6dlhq9@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon" 
> wrote:
>
>>Among the prolific many of articles devoted to the Levant Holocaust,
>
> My sympathies go out to the Levants, whoever they may be.

You've been well trained. Mention holocaust and you automatically express 
your sympathy. The holocaust I was referring to was Ezra Levant's personal 
holocaust with the Alberta Human Rights Commission and the chorus of 
supporters rushing to his aid.

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:33:20 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>
>"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
>news:6j2vp31jsccpa0si9aubjs6lqg3j6dlhq9@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Among the prolific many of articles devoted to the Levant Holocaust,
>>
>> My sympathies go out to the Levants, whoever they may be.
>
>You've been well trained. Mention holocaust and you automatically express 
>your sympathy. The holocaust I was referring to was Ezra Levant's personal 
>holocaust 

His house burned down?

by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later.  If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org

http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

wrote in message news:1PMnj.6381$O9.2861@trnddc01...
>
> On 29-Jan-2008, David Johnston  wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon"
>
> I spotted him, I spotted him!
> What do I win?
>
> Susan
>

So you accuse me of being the fascist for questioning jewish hate mongering
and an article that clearly intends to re-frame the issue. That's right - I
must be the fascist since I point out the many inconsistencies of this
story. I must be the fascist since I'm not agreeing with the jews. I must be
the fascist since jews have used the commissions in this country for many
years but now since one of their own is under attack, all rush to his aid
with a prolific number of articles deriding the commissions' work.

I'm the fascist since I can't get a job but in 1999 the commission fought
for the rights of a convicted pedophile to resume his job when he got out of
jail. Funny, I didn't hear anyone screaming about that or printing articles
about the commission needing to be reigned in. By contract when a jew is
questioned, all hell breaks loose, the commissions and anyone associated
with them are labeled everything derogatory with the exception of being
called the Third Reich.

I guess I'm the fascist since I don't have a newspaper and an ideological
agenda to forward.

On Jan 30, 1:11 am, "Meldon"  wrote:
>  wrote in messagenews:1PMnj.6381$O9.2861@trnddc01...
>
> > On 29-Jan-2008, David Johnston  wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:32:49 -0500, "Meldon"
>
> > I spotted him, I spotted him!
> > What do I win?
>
> > Susan
>
> So you accuse me of being the fascist for questioning jewish hate mongering
> and an article that clearly intends to re-frame the issue. That's right - I
> must be the fascist since I point out the many inconsistencies of this
> story. I must be the fascist since I'm not agreeing with the jews. I must be
> the fascist since jews have used the commissions in this country for many
> years but now since one of their own is under attack, all rush to his aid
> with a prolific number of articles deriding the commissions' work.
>
> I'm the fascist since I can't get a job but in 1999 the commission fought
> for the rights of a convicted pedophile to resume his job when he got out of
> jail. Funny, I didn't hear anyone screaming about that or printing articles
> about the commission needing to be reigned in. By contract when a jew is
> questioned, all hell breaks loose, the commissions and anyone associated
> with them are labeled everything derogatory with the exception of being
> called the Third Reich.
>
> I guess I'm the fascist since I don't have a newspaper and an ideological
> agenda to forward.

Well, you might not be a fascist. OTOH, you ARE an anti semitic BIGOT.

HTH.

Andre