It really seems like if a woman gets a FIGHTER of an attorney
that doesn't work against them, but if a man gets a FIGHTER
it's looked at more negatively.

I know a guy who had some wealth and his wife
cheated on him and went for divorce.
He got incredibly lucky that she didn't want
to take half of his business and holdings.

Her female attorney was actually ANGRY at her client
for refusing to go after half of it all.

Attorneys representing women don't seem to
hesitate one bit to make the aggressive moves in court.

I also think all of this changes considerably when
a Child Protection AGENCY gets involved in one
of these custody battles.

I've seen some signs that the agencies are under
fire for getting into divorce custody issues too much
and I've heard some amazing reports of cases where
they ran from a case like the plague because it
was a divorce/custody case.

That the best outcome would have to come from
a man refusing to vigorously fight seems just so
wrong considering that women's attorneys seem
to go for the JUGULAR.

I can see that a peaceful approach might be
better, but it just seems so wrong to be
the punching bag for an aggressor.

Why is it so OK for women's attorneys to tear a new one
while it's bad form for a man's attorney to do the same?
I'm not denying that it works this way, but lamenting
the basic insanity of it.


On Dec 30, 8:37 am, " krp"  wrote:
> "fathersrights"  wrote in message
>
> news:27Ddj.9342$E01.7749@newsfe22.lga...
>
> > If you don't realize that tactics are sometimes even more important than> > facts you are naive and have NO experience in winning cases for fathers
>
>     Ron - more important than what? Winning what? We are talking about> FATHERING here, not some GAME. Oh YOU are. But I am not, I am talking about
> a daddy loving his kids. I am talking about a dad earning the lifelong
> respect of his kids. I won custody, but that was not the prize I was really
> looking for. There is a difference here. Those "TACTICS" are BULLSHIT Ron.> They miss the entire point. Legal TRICKS isn't what it's about. It's about> being GENUINE! This isn't, or should never be, about getting lower child
> support payments, or TACTICS to win PROPERTY. It's about men being to be a> DADDY and it's about kids deserving their fathers LOVE not his god damn
> TACTICS.  I leave the "TACTICS" to the Feminazis, I don't have time for
> them. I refuse to see children as a trophy as they do. Or a meal ticket.
>
>     Ron about having "experience in winning cases for fathers" I think I
> have loads of experience in that. Not just in seeing dads be awarded
> custody, but in actually winning. Not just grabbing property. But in BEING a
> Daddy Ron. There is a HUGE difference here, it's clear you don't see it. It
> isn't about beating women or WINNING the legal game. It's about BEING "Dad> Having that child on your knee and teaching them about life. It's about
> LOVING your kids. And Ron, I can do that in a few hours as well as a few
> days IF my kids are in my heart instead of a PRIZE to be won. Often WINNING
> is having it so kids have BOTH parents. Do you love your kids enough to
> SHARE them with the other parent even when she doesn't worship your ass any
> more? A WIN is often found in finding ways to work things out with
> disagreeable people and burying the past.  YOU fight your WARS Ron, I'll> keep on trying to win for the KIDS.